TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Humor: Canadian PM Jean Chrétien
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »


Posted by Dj Smitty20 on Jun-05-2003 08:20:

quote:
Originally posted by Eugene
Still, Canada is second to the US in terms of people's desire to live there and the amount of opportunities (incl. job opportunities, but not necessarily).

99% of immigrants try to get into the USA. Canada is a 'backup' option. There must be a reason for that don't you think?


This is due to propaganda....."the home of the free, bla bla. house with a white picket fence, equal opportunities." The United States and Britain still have the highest gap between the rich and poor in the western world.

Smart immigrants come to Canada...mostly because we welcome them with open arms and end up paying for them for the first few years. It's actually quite hard to get into Canada these days....about 400,000 people are let in each year to keep out population of 31,000,000 growing slowly but steadily. Canada is multicultural, unlike the US, where everybody HAS to be American. Oh, and the strongest growing currencies right now are the Euro and the Canadian dollar, whereas the US dollar is declining in international worth. The Canadian economy feeds off the US yes, but it does not need it to be successful for our own to flourish. The US is in a small recession right now....is Canada? Nope.

We also have free healthcare open to EVERYONE. That's something Americans have never had and will never have.

And currently....Canada is number 3 in the world behind Norway and Sweden. The Netherlands follows Canada at number 4. Britain is ahead of The US I believe and Germany, Japan. Just face it Yanks....your country isn't as great as you're told it is.


Posted by Dj Smitty20 on Jun-05-2003 08:26:

quote:
Originally posted by Eugene
Well, that's true and all of these are very good points that I wish I could say about the US. Socially Canada has a better atmosphere but it's not as prosperous or influential as the US.


Ok sure, the US does have more economic power and military might as well as international influence...but where would you rather live? In a nation that spends close to 30% of its GDP on military power rather than on its own people or a nation that may charge 9% more taxes but gives it back to people in the form of education loans and a universal healthcare program....not to mention VERY generous Unemployment rates, subsidies to farming and fishing industries, recognises labour rights and unions, etc etc etc.

Are YOU really benefitting from the fact that your President and his Cabinet can tell a small, poor and socially inept country like Iraq what to do, or for that matter, bomb the absolute SHIT out of it? I would think not.

No wonder Americans travelling to Europe and Asia strap Canadian flags on their backpacks.


Posted by trintiy on Jun-05-2003 11:17:

I didn't want to get involved in this but here it goes!

Every country in the world is screwed up about its relationship with the US. But in Canada it seems to be a national obsession, even a neurosis. Imagine, if you will, a homely kind of girl - well-liked but usually ignored(that's you Canada) - who lives next door to the town hunk(that's us). He is the centre of all her thoughts. She peers through the net curtains as he swaggers out for a night on the town. She reads major significance into every gesture: every time he ignores her on the street; every time he gives her an affectionate pat. She despises his unruly ways but, deep down, desperately wants to believe this is true love. He barely even gives her a thought. In romantic fiction, you end up with a white wedding and happy-ever-aftering. In international diplomacy, you get the US-Canada relationship.

Canadian Nationalism & anti-Americanism go hand in hand. In Canada, it is difficult to find a nationalist who can promote Canada without demoting the United States. In essence Canada defines itself in contrast to the United States. This isn't surprising of course, considering Canada's geographic position and the fact that 90% of Canada's population is within 100 miles of the US border.

http://www.unitednorthamerica.org/canadapop.htm

Canada's economy is utterly dependent on the United States, and Americans pump more than $10 billion directly into it every year. Nine million of us cross the northern border more than 40 million times annually, and we buy lots of stuff. And that stuff is heavily taxed by the tax-and-spend Canadian government. So what happens if we all emulate Mr. Bush and just say no to the land of snow?

Canada's economy melts, that's what happens.


http://www.unitednorthamerica.org/simdiff.htm

As I said before it was a joke get off your high horses!!!!!!!!


Posted by Eugene on Jun-05-2003 14:00:

quote:
Originally posted by Dj Smitty20
we welcome them with open arms


quote:
Originally posted by Dj Smitty20
It's actually quite hard to get into Canada these days....about 400,000 people are let in each year


^^ um, a little contradiction here... Ironic how you put these sentences right next to each other... By the way, Canada does not welcome 'everyone' -- only those without the "burden" of elderly parents... I know, I have friends living in Canada!

quote:

Just face it Yanks....your country isn't as great as you're told it is.

Well, first of all, I'm not a Yank, I'm Russian.... In response to your question "Where would you rather live?" I would definitely say USA... because of the higher standard of living, more opportunities, more people, more exciting life. Besides the fact that we have always been #1 for all immigrants, and are the top economy in the world, and have the friendliest people in the Western world, we are also an exciting place to live: We have Las Vegas, Miami Florida with South Beach, California.. We have New York, the capital of the world... Sure, we may have some bad social and foreign policies (no country is perfect), but no other country comes close to the United States in terms of the quality of life: social, economic, personal...


Posted by occrider on Jun-05-2003 14:16:

quote:
Originally posted by Dj Smitty20

Smart immigrants come to Canada...mostly because we welcome them with open arms and end up paying for them for the first few years. It's actually quite hard to get into Canada these days....about 400,000 people are let in each year to keep out population of 31,000,000 growing slowly but steadily. Canada is multicultural, unlike the US, where everybody HAS to be American. Oh, and the strongest growing currencies right now are the Euro and the Canadian dollar, whereas the US dollar is declining in international worth. The Canadian economy feeds off the US yes, but it does not need it to be successful for our own to flourish. The US is in a small recession right now....is Canada? Nope.

We also have free healthcare open to EVERYONE. That's something Americans have never had and will never have.

And currently....Canada is number 3 in the world behind Norway and Sweden. The Netherlands follows Canada at number 4. Britain is ahead of The US I believe and Germany, Japan. Just face it Yanks....your country isn't as great as you're told it is.


Ok smart guy, first of all currency valuations have no bearing on the economic success of a country. Second of all, the US is NOT in a state of recession. If you want to quote actual figures, Canada had gdp growth of 1.6% in Q4 of 2002 as compared to US growth of 1.4% so don't even try to play that card. Thirdly, if you had actually read the link that I had posted of the country rankings, the US is 6th behind Belgium and Australia, HOWEVER, if you had read further you would have seen that the Human Development index for the US was tied with Australia and Belgium and is 1/10 of a PERCENT behind Canada. So as somebody mentioned before GET OFF YOUR HIGH HORSE ALREADY.

Edit: Oh yes, and since all the dumb immigrants come to the US as opposed to the "smart" immigrants, at least they have a better chance of getting a job considering your unemployment rate is 7.7%

Now can we stop with the silly country bashing already? Or would you like to talk more economics?


Posted by melech_mike on Jun-05-2003 16:10:

Born in Israel, living in Toronto since I’ve been 1.5years old. My parents are Russian and I have Spanish and Persian roots. I've traveled extensively throughout North America. I must say that Canada or more specifically, Toronto is a great place for kids to grow, learn, and develop as young adults. We could use up the heavily subsidized University educations we receive, and have all our broken bones fixed for free with our oh-so-beautiful O.H.I.P. (Ontario health insurance plan) card!

It's at this time (after we sucked Canada dry for its subsidized education) that we should all be making the move to the US... because straight the fuck up... CANADA as a whole - SUCKS!

Don't get me wrong... Canadians for the most part are awesome... preferred well over the Americans anywhere in the world. Americans are raised as animalistic freaks... I’m not even joking... they are TOO rowdy and don’t know where to draw the line sometimes.

anyways, since I love what America is trying to do in this world (rid it of terror monkeys), and Canada just sits on the side a picks it's ass, my overall opinion stands favourably on the side of the good old United States of America!

Although I must say, anti-Semitism is a serious problem still and mustn't still exist in a day 'n' age such as ours!

The Chicago Tribune crossed the line today, with a truly vile antisemitic cartoon. Here it is.

The Chicago Sun Times is disgusted, and pulls no punches in their commentary: Here it is -- Scroll down to Caricature Assasination


Posted by Dj Smitty20 on Jun-05-2003 21:14:

quote:
Originally posted by Eugene
^^ um, a little contradiction here... Ironic how you put these sentences right next to each other... By the way, Canada does not welcome 'everyone' -- only those without the "burden" of elderly parents... I know, I have friends living in Canada!


Well, first of all, I'm not a Yank, I'm Russian.... In response to your question "Where would you rather live?" I would definitely say USA... because of the higher standard of living, more opportunities, more people, more exciting life. Besides the fact that we have always been #1 for all immigrants, and are the top economy in the world, and have the friendliest people in the Western world, we are also an exciting place to live: We have Las Vegas, Miami Florida with South Beach, California.. We have New York, the capital of the world... Sure, we may have some bad social and foreign policies (no country is perfect), but no other country comes close to the United States in terms of the quality of life: social, economic, personal...


Why do you keep saying the United States has the highest quality of life? We've already covered that.....and the USA does not have it. I guess this is another example of Americans being totally ignorant to UN reports and instead, choosing to believe their own propaganda. The top 4, as of 2002 are Norway, Sweden, Canada and the Netherlands. From 1993-2000, it was Canada at the top. The United States has NEVER been at the top of that list.

And Americans being the friendliest people in the world? Mm hmm......so tell me again.....WHY do Americans travelling to Europe strap Canadian flags on their backpacks?


Posted by Dj Smitty20 on Jun-05-2003 21:56:

Melech_Mike: It's not surprising you're kissing the American's ass right now. You're obviously an Israeli Jew and quite obviously supported the War in Iraq....like every Jew out there.

I'm not being pro-Arab here, but you talk about terrorism? Before Israel actually became a country in the mid to late 1940's, the Jews there methodically went about assassinating British civilians and military personnel. Ever heard of the King David Hotel bombing? How Israeli's conveniently forget their past.

At least Canada had the guts to stand up for what it believes in and didn't back down JUST because the US told them everybody should go to war. When Canada and Britain went to war against Germany in 1939....where were the Yanks? They let war rage on for 2.5 years before coming in and helping so fuck right off.

I say if you don't like Canada....then get the FUCK out and go the USA


Posted by occrider on Jun-05-2003 23:21:

quote:
Originally posted by Dj Smitty20
When Canada and Britain went to war against Germany in 1939....where were the Yanks? They let war rage on for 2.5 years before coming in and helping so fuck right off.


The US contributed just as much as Canada did during these two years with the exception of 80 Canadian pilots who fought in the battle of britain.


Posted by Tudo Beleza on Jun-06-2003 03:32:

Everyone is nationalistic, so whatever country you are from you will believe that it is the best country to live in and that the things that are not good about your country are small in compared to the things that make your country great. Americans will love America, Canadians will love Canada and that is how the world works. I have come to realize through my travels that i do not consider one country to be better then another just different in their own way, to gain something in one country you give up something you had in another country.


Posted by Dj Smitty20 on Jun-06-2003 07:23:

quote:
Originally posted by occrider
The US contributed just as much as Canada did during these two years with the exception of 80 Canadian pilots who fought in the battle of britain.


Oh yes....and what about the thousands of Canadians that died trying to save Hong Kong? Or the few thousand that died in the Atlantic from 39-41 that were transporting arms and food to Britain? US ships were not attacked during this time so don't start that.

Actually, if you REALLY want to get into the grit and dirt....are any Americans aware that General Motors actually tried to negotiate with Hitler about selling him tanks/planes/ammunition to fight Russia with once britain "had been conquered." It's a bloody good thing Britain managed to hold its own and defeat the Luftwaffe in 1940.


Posted by CortexBomb on Jun-06-2003 13:59:

quote:
Originally posted by Tudo Beleza
Everyone is nationalistic, so whatever country you are from you will believe that it is the best country to live in and that the things that are not good about your country are small in compared to the things that make your country great. Americans will love America, Canadians will love Canada and that is how the world works. I have come to realize through my travels that i do not consider one country to be better then another just different in their own way, to gain something in one country you give up something you had in another country.


Good theory in general, but like most generalized things tends to fall apart when you try to apply it to specific people.

Case in point: Me.

Born and raised in the United States but quickly became disillusioned with the way the country is run and some of the prevelent attitudes here.

Visited Canada multiple times with my parents as a kid and became infatuated with them to the point where I now plan to leave the States as soon as I can get my BA to pursue my MA in Canada and hopefully will be allowed to immigrate.

I don't think all countries are created equal either, you can't tell me that living in say, the Congo is comparable to living in the UK, that they're both just 'good in their own ways'.

The only disadvantage per se of living in Canada as compared to the US is the fact that your government is likely to cave in to America when push comes to shove out of necessity.

Yes, the CDN dollar is worth less, but wages are also higher to compensate.

Yes, taxes are higher, but I'm a socialist so free health care in trade for more taxes is a good trade-off IMHO.

No, the country doesn't have a large military, but that also means they're not wasting your tax money on an arms race with god knows who.

Most importantly the violent crime rate in Canada is tiny compared to the US (per capita, not just raw numbers) and the attitude toward things like marijuana are much more in tune with my own views (and incidentally, no, I don't smoke myself, but I think the 'war on drugs' is a ridiculous waste of money)

Though certain anti-semitic people on this thread are seemingly going out of their way to convince people here that ignorant asses live in Canada as well as the US, I still think the base point is valid, as an average citizen (read: not rich) you're better off living in Canada than the US.

Just my opinion of course...


Posted by occrider on Jun-06-2003 14:16:

quote:
Originally posted by Dj Smitty20
Oh yes....and what about the thousands of Canadians that died trying to save Hong Kong? Or the few thousand that died in the Atlantic from 39-41 that were transporting arms and food to Britain? US ships were not attacked during this time so don't start that.

Actually, if you REALLY want to get into the grit and dirt....are any Americans aware that General Motors actually tried to negotiate with Hitler about selling him tanks/planes/ammunition to fight Russia with once britain "had been conquered." It's a bloody good thing Britain managed to hold its own and defeat the Luftwaffe in 1940.


US ships WERE attacked, because the Germans practiced unrestricted submarine warfare. Not to mention the US attacked German submarines threatening allied shipping that crossed the neutrality zone established by the US to aid the lend-lease program.

Your attempts to diminish the US's role and intentions in WW2 are really rather pathetic. I would suggest you stop now.


Posted by DaveSZ on Jun-06-2003 15:36:

Funny how most Americans can laugh at Bush's speech problems, but when it's the Canadian PM.....

BTW trinity New Orleans rox!!!!! WOOOOO!


Posted by Wurm on Jun-06-2003 15:51:

quote:
Originally posted by occrider
US ships WERE attacked, because the Germans practiced unrestricted submarine warfare. Not to mention the US attacked German submarines threatening allied shipping that crossed the neutrality zone established by the US to aid the lend-lease program.

Your attempts to diminish the US's role and intentions in WW2 are really rather pathetic. I would suggest you stop now.


Would you prefer we go back to WWI?

How long did that last? Was it 1914-1918 or 1917-1918?
I know, limited Canadian sovereignty blah blah blah...


Posted by trintiy on Jun-06-2003 16:31:

Canadian death toll from WWII - 42,000
US death toll from WWII - 295,000
Figures are rounded to nearest 1000

Canadian involvement in WWII:
In December 1939 the Ist Canadian Division left for Britain. They were followed later by two other infantry divisions, two armoured divisions and two armoured brigades.

In 1941 two Canadian battalions were sent to the defence of Hong Kong but they were captured by the invading Japanese Army in December 1941. Of these, 246 died as a result of harsh treatment while prisoners of war.

The Royal Canadian Air Force contributed a squadron during the Battle of Britain and 48 other Canadian squadrons fought during the war. Canada also provided facilities and personnel for the British Commonwealth Air Training Plan which produced 131,553 airmen for Commonwealth countries.

Canadian soldiers were used on the raid on Dieppe in France in August 1942. The attempt to take and hold the port was a disaster and 3,367 out of the 4,963 Canadians who took part were killed, wounded or captured.

The 3rd Canadian Division and second armoured brigade took part in the invasion of Normandy in June 1944. The Canadians suffered heavily casualties during the fighting at Pas de Calais, Caen and Falaise. They fought throughout the Netherlands and participated in the recapture of Antwerp.

After the surrender of Germany in April 1945, a Canadian occupation force remained in the country until 1946.


US involvement:
If you would like to see the US involvement in WWII follow the links, the data was to great to post in this thread!

http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/2WWarmedforces.htm

http://www.donet.com/%7Emconrad/links.htm

http://www.secondworldwar.co.uk/

So as one of you so eloquently put it Fuck right off!

BTW First WW June 28, 1914- June 28 1919
Almost 600,000 Canadians joined the army during the First World War. Of these, 418,000 served overseas with the Canadian Expeditionary Force (CEF) and sixty-three of these won the Victoria Cross, including William Bishop and John MacGregor. The CEF had 210,000 casualties, of whom, 56,500 were killed.

By July 1918 there were over a million US soldiers in France. General John Pershing deployed US troops to help the French defend the Western Front during the 3rd Battle of the Aisne in May and at the Marne in June. US troops also took part in the Allied attacks at Le Hamel and Canal du Nord before Pershing launched his own offensive at St Mihiel and Meuse-Argonne.

More than 2 million troops eventually reached Europe but a large number arrived too late to see any action. The American Expeditionary Force suffered 264,000 casualties during the war. It has been calculated that 112,432 Americans died. Of these, around 50 per cent died from disease (mainly influenza).


Posted by occrider on Jun-06-2003 16:34:

quote:
Originally posted by Wurm
Would you prefer we go back to WWI?

How long did that last? Was it 1914-1918 or 1917-1918?
I know, limited Canadian sovereignty blah blah blah...


US Casualties in WW1: 118,000
Canadian Casualties in WW1: 60,000

Look asshole. Your argument is akin to something like ... well Russia was an ally of Germany and didn't enter the war until 1941 so their 20 MILLION plus casualties and contribution to the war effort is in some way not as noble as saintly Canada's . This didn't start off with anybody from the US critisizing Canada's role in WW1 and WW2. Actual CRITICISM with regards to this topic of WW1 and WW2 has been flowing one way. I'm not going to stoop to the level of demeaning your country's contributions and sacrifices in either war so you can go to hell.

Edit: looks like trinity beat me to the punch. Normally I can keep my cool but this argument has gotten pathetically lame.


Posted by trintiy on Jun-06-2003 16:43:

^^^^^ Agreed, I can't believe that something that started out as a bit of humor, has turned into this!!!!!!


Posted by Dj Smitty20 on Jun-06-2003 22:18:

Canada contributed as much as it could. Almost 900,000 Canadians were involved in WW1....at the time, our total population in 1918 was LESS than 10,000,000. After the success at Vimy Ridge, Canadians were the most feared troops on the western front. A small, but effective army, as in WW2. On D Day 1944, (59 years ago today), Canadians pushed further at Juno Beach than the Brits did at Sword and Gold or the Yanks at Omaha and Utah but faced similar opposition.

And US ships were not attacked from 1939-41....or else FDR would have gone to war immediately against Germany. He could only get the full support of his people when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor.(which higher ups knew about by the way, but let it happen)

But whatever...we all did our part. But I'm really sick of seeing Americans and their movies attempt to portray that it was only Americans that won both wars. The three tide turning battles in WW2 were fought before American forces even engaged the Germans. They are the Battle of Britain, Stalingrad and El Alamein (the last one stopped Rommel from acquiring oil in Egypt).

What the Americans DID do was help out Britain and Russia with supplies and made the war in Europe end faster than it would have without them. And they made a huge contribution in fighting the Japs.


Posted by quddha on Jun-07-2003 11:48:

What happened in these wars were decisions made by a few people over half a century ago. We can't say shit now, because we were not the ones sent to fight in these wars. Its silly to undermine the efforts of the Americans during these times, and its also silly to to think that Americans "bailed out the europeans" in the world wars.

It's easy to criticize or take credit now, but we'll never know what really went on in the minds of the people involved.

With that said, I'm happy to live in Canada, and I'm happy with our current PM, and I can laugh along with jokes aimed at him. This country gives me $8000 every year so I can go to school, half of it I don't need to pay back, (mind u school is ALOT cheaper here than the US), and I don't pay a cent when I go see my family doctor. And there is no waiting lines to do that.

I've been to big US cities, like New York, and Miami. I lived with my uncle in the Bronx for two weeks. Let's just say that you can't really compare standard of living for an immigrant in the middle of New York with the standard of living for an immigrant in Toronto or Vancouver.

US citizens can keep chanting "U.S.A" and "we're number 1," bragging about their economic powerhouse and how rich they are, but as a poor-ass student living in the middle of a metropolis, I definately know where I'd rather be.


Posted by DR86 on Jun-07-2003 18:59:

I think it's safe to say that the Russians had the most casualities in WWI and WWII combined.
PLease don't hurt me if i'm wrong...


Posted by occrider on Jun-07-2003 19:38:

quote:
Originally posted by Dj Smitty20

And US ships were not attacked from 1939-41....or else FDR would have gone to war immediately against Germany. He could only get the full support of his people when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor.(which higher ups knew about by the way, but let it happen)


http://www.ndu.edu/inss/macnair/mcnair33/m33c4con.html

Oh and the higher ups likely did not know of the attack at pearl harbor. They had reason to suspect that Japanese attack was going to occur SOMEWHERE in the pacific but they didn't have direct data indicating the Japanese fleet was storming towards Pearl Harbor. All those coded intercepts that people like to use as evidence of FDR's duplicity and knowledge of the attacks weren't even decoded until after the attack.

quote:

The three tide turning battles in WW2 were fought before American forces even engaged the Germans. They are the Battle of Britain, Stalingrad and El Alamein (the last one stopped Rommel from acquiring oil in Egypt).


You might want to add the battle of the atlantic to that list. Although technically the battle of Britain and the battle of the atlantic are not really tide turners since they were defensive actions that did not really cripple the German war machine. The Bulge could be considered decisive since it was the last German counterattack that had any chance at success.

quote:

I think it's safe to say that the Russians had the most casualities in WWI and WWII combined.
PLease don't hurt me if i'm wrong...


I'm a huge fan of 20th centure European history. I think that it can be easily said that the Russians made the greatest sacrifice of the 20th century anywhere. Historians cannot accurately pinpoint the total number of Russian dead in WW2, but the low end estimates say somewhere along the lines of 20 million dead with the high estimates somewhere along the lines of 40 or 50 million. Compare this with 300,000 Americans and 3.5-4.5 million Germans. Also what a lot of people forget is that something like 5-15 million Chinese died as well. Just goes to show what countries can accomplish when they engage in total war.


Posted by Dj Smitty20 on Jun-07-2003 21:40:

The Battle of Britain was a HUGE tide turning battle! Come on man....wake up!! England was on its own with its back up against the wall....France (with a bigger army than both England AND Germany...fucking French. ) had already fallen. The combination of the superiority of British (and commonwealth, Check, free french, polish, a few yanks, etc) pilots and British aircraft at odds of over 4-1 AND after Hitler's stupid decision to attack the cities rather than airfields granted the Allies the first major victory of the war. If England had not defeated the Luftwaffe, there would have been no war for the Americans to join. British support, and later American, would never have reached Russia. Germany would have been able to defeat Russia in 1941-42 had she not been tied up in Africa and in the Atlantic combatting British and Commonwealth trooops. Plus, the Battle of Britain was a massive victory for morale. It showed the British still had a fight in them to give.....no wonder Hitler abandoned Operation Sea Lion, because he knew without control of the air, he could not face the Royal Navy (still the largest and most powerful in the world at the time). Also....over 2000 German aircraft were shot down in the BoB. compared to about 900 British aircraft. The Germans also lost over 3,000 experienced air crewman. Had those numbers not been lost, the Germans would have had clear air superiority over Russia and in Western Europe during the D-Day invasion.

I think you fail to see the effects of Britain defeating Germany in the air in 1940. Without that victory, WW2 would have been over by 1942 at the latest.

OH, and quddha....you're my new hero.


Posted by DR86 on Jun-08-2003 04:06:

quote:
Originally posted by Dj Smitty20
The Battle of Britain was a HUGE tide turning battle! Come on man....wake up!! England was on its own with its back up against the wall....France (with a bigger army than both England AND Germany...fucking French. ) had already fallen. The combination of the superiority of British (and commonwealth, Check, free french, polish, a few yanks, etc) pilots and British aircraft at odds of over 4-1 AND after Hitler's stupid decision to attack the cities rather than airfields granted the Allies the first major victory of the war. If England had not defeated the Luftwaffe, there would have been no war for the Americans to join. British support, and later American, would never have reached Russia. Germany would have been able to defeat Russia in 1941-42 had she not been tied up in Africa and in the Atlantic combatting British and Commonwealth trooops. Plus, the Battle of Britain was a massive victory for morale. It showed the British still had a fight in them to give.....no wonder Hitler abandoned Operation Sea Lion, because he knew without control of the air, he could not face the Royal Navy (still the largest and most powerful in the world at the time). Also....over 2000 German aircraft were shot down in the BoB. compared to about 900 British aircraft. The Germans also lost over 3,000 experienced air crewman. Had those numbers not been lost, the Germans would have had clear air superiority over Russia and in Western Europe during the D-Day invasion.

I think you fail to see the effects of Britain defeating Germany in the air in 1940. Without that victory, WW2 would have been over by 1942 at the latest.

OH, and quddha....you're my new hero.


What are you saying is very true. The British presence in the air, and eventually in the water against the German U-Boat fleets greatly encouraged the Allied victory. I think that if the Russians had not lost so many on the battlefield before their victories against Germany, the European theater would have ended much sooner.


Posted by occrider on Jun-08-2003 08:29:

quote:
Originally posted by Dj Smitty20
The Battle of Britain was a HUGE tide turning battle! Come on man....wake up!! England was on its own with its back up against the wall....France (with a bigger army than both England AND Germany...fucking French. ) had already fallen. The combination of the superiority of British (and commonwealth, Check, free french, polish, a few yanks, etc) pilots and British aircraft at odds of over 4-1 AND after Hitler's stupid decision to attack the cities rather than airfields granted the Allies the first major victory of the war. If England had not defeated the Luftwaffe, there would have been no war for the Americans to join. British support, and later American, would never have reached Russia. Germany would have been able to defeat Russia in 1941-42 had she not been tied up in Africa and in the Atlantic combatting British and Commonwealth trooops. Plus, the Battle of Britain was a massive victory for morale. It showed the British still had a fight in them to give.....no wonder Hitler abandoned Operation Sea Lion, because he knew without control of the air, he could not face the Royal Navy (still the largest and most powerful in the world at the time). Also....over 2000 German aircraft were shot down in the BoB. compared to about 900 British aircraft. The Germans also lost over 3,000 experienced air crewman. Had those numbers not been lost, the Germans would have had clear air superiority over Russia and in Western Europe during the D-Day invasion.

I think you fail to see the effects of Britain defeating Germany in the air in 1940. Without that victory, WW2 would have been over by 1942 at the latest.

OH, and quddha....you're my new hero.


You misunderstand me . I understand the importance of the battle of britain in repelling operation sea lion ... don't get me wrong. But with respects to a turning point of the war I disagree. I say this because the battle of britain was a defensive effort that resulted in the continuity and survival of Britain's existence. However, it did not result in a disruption of Germany's stranglehold over Europe nor a diminishment of its industrial capacity. I place credit where credit is deserved and if you ask me, EVERY major turning point in the war took place in Russia. Yes the allied bombing of German industry had a huge impact and yes the opening of the second front was decisive in ensuring victory but get this. I think the numbers add up such that 80% of ALL german casualties occurred at the eastern front. The fact that american AND european history textbooks gloss over this fact is grossly criminal.


Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.