TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- American Court believes glowsticks are drug paraphernalia
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »


Posted by twilochik on Jun-21-2001 02:53:

Worm Popper

ummm...just wanted to point out that this took place in new orleans in a local court. so all you peeps bashing gw bush better learn something about our government....gw has nothing to do with law making like this...and this was done in the local state court not a national court...such as the supreme court so he has nothing to do with this. and even if this went to the supreme court to become a national thing he still would have nothing to do with it....it would then fall into the hands of the supreme court justices. all this article is saying is that this is a trend among local courts and could become a national thing. don't blame gw...he has nothing to do with it. blame the judges and who hand down these laws! And remember to vote...yeah your thinking what does it matter....but if you don't vote then you got no right to complain....and what about writing to your representatives in congress....all states have 2 senators and numerous reps. send them a line and tell them what you think instead of bitching on the board.


Posted by TrAnCe CoNtRoL on Jun-21-2001 04:01:

damn i was pissed when our high school principal banned glowsticks at our school dances because he thought it promoted the use of "ecstacy". now this!!!!!!!! what the fuck has this world come to.


Posted by bluE_Neon on Jun-21-2001 05:19:

lol da us government is a fucken joke, dis shit is going on and on
it already started in canada with da raves, closing dem down, now dis shit will appear
ya COMMUNIST where better yez i rememba those days in Poland


Posted by DJ_Bod on Jun-21-2001 14:04:

quote:
Originally posted by Eugene
Finally... I think the best way to deal with the drug problem is to legalize some drugs or not be so strict about it, like they do in Holland... Look, in Holland they have fewer drug-abuse problems, teenage pregnancies, etc., and they're much more open about all these issues!


Thats the way I feel about this... We need to open up to the culture instead of repressing it... Besides, If they legalize XTC, they could put a tax on it, and make more money, and boost the economy... Damn... I think I should become a senator, and teach these people that everything they do is wrong...


Posted by DJ Juno on Jun-21-2001 14:16:

quote:
Originally posted by goldenarmZ
omg... they're taking away chill out rooms, bottled water and air conditioning in an attempt to stop people taking drugs?!? do they want people to die or something?? no matter what they do, the drugs will still be there, this is the exact opposite of what should be happening!!

Somebody needs to assassinate George Dubbya Bush before he fucks america up for good. (I'm not american.. can I still get the death penalty for saying that?.. I don't care)
i live in usa, and i agree w/u, bush isa c*ck sucker!


Posted by LiquidX on Jun-21-2001 16:02:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ_Bod


Thats the way I feel about this... We need to open up to the culture instead of repressing it... Besides, If they legalize XTC, they could put a tax on it, and make more money, and boost the economy... Damn... I think I should become a senator, and teach these people that everything they do is wrong...


Thats true, I agree, in germany, you can drink beer and go to Clubs at 16, Holland, they allow you to go into a rave with no more of certain amount of pills and so on...
There's a problem why I do not agree with it, but here in the states, the big problem is the socity in wich the states is composed of, if laws were changed, people will be immature enough that we will be seeing 100 peeps drop dead once the law of letting XTC flow , I live in the USA, and let me tell you, here people are immature , they dont take things like they do in Europe as a whole, we american TA's are like the only mature ones ... States is just not ready for it, thats the thing, but if the law is passed, maybe at the beggining it will be causing trouble, but when new generations of kids are born with the law , they will make the difference in the future.


Posted by Johnny Eckhardt on Jun-21-2001 21:30:

Well, it's just one more example of how fucked up the American government is. As usual, they take everything to the extreme.There's so much to this article that I could comment on but I would be here a week writing it all. So I'll just say....yeah, go ahead and make pacifiers illegal, you anal retentive dumb fucks! And when you do, you better make sure that the law applies to everybody.....including babies. If ravers can be arrested for possession of a pacifier...then babies should be arrested too!


Posted by trintiy on Jun-21-2001 22:08:

Umm, I have to agree with Twilochik here, This has nothing to do with the PRESIDENT, You live in the country, try learning how its run. I'm orignally from New Orleans where all this kicked off, its local politicans making these rulings, Nothing at all to do with the country as a whole. Twilo was shut down recently and that had absolutly nothing to do with the country as a whole or the President, its the local mayor setting rules on how they want their cities run. And guess what its not national elections or even the President that appoints these Mayors, its you, your families and your friends, there all local elections!!! If you don't like the policy set forth by that political figure then during the next election don't vote for them, and encourage other people not to vote for them, its as simple as that. Choose or lose is one of the most profound statements out there and now that something you care about is being affected by politics it amazing how many people wanna do something about it or get involved, you should have been involved from the time you were able to vote. And to all you Americans who are bashing the United States your really starting to piss me off, You don't even realize that what your saying about the U.S is exactly what makes the U.S. the greatest country in the world. Not many other countries will tolerate the slander and verbal threats on it's political figures, but being and American gives you that right to express your veiw without retribution. Try reading the Constitution and your Bill of rights


Posted by totalcarnage on Jun-21-2001 22:22:

quote:
Originally posted by twilochik
ummm...just wanted to point out that this took place in new orleans in a local court. so all you peeps bashing gw bush better learn something about our government....gw has nothing to do with law making like this...and this was done in the local state court not a national court...such as the supreme court so he has nothing to do with this. and even if this went to the supreme court to become a national thing he still would have nothing to do with it....it would then fall into the hands of the supreme court justices. all this article is saying is that this is a trend among local courts and could become a national thing. don't blame gw...he has nothing to do with it. blame the judges and who hand down these laws! And remember to vote...yeah your thinking what does it matter....but if you don't vote then you got no right to complain....and what about writing to your representatives in congress....all states have 2 senators and numerous reps. send them a line and tell them what you think instead of bitching on the board.


Yup, you are absolutley right...just remember we are a democracy with checks and balances...he doesn't make all the decisions 'round here.


Posted by bluE_Neon on Jun-21-2001 22:56:

TC u live in LA and u have power...wow, inprovements i see, coz u prolly dat nothern California was gonna be short of power..actually they will be short 4 16 weeks i suppose? right? read it some article and da shortage is suppose 2 be in summer time as well, where they calculated about 16 hours of rolling blackouts each week from June through September hm, now Bush promised 2 do economical changes, blablabla..they knew a while ago dat dis will happen 2 dem and why they didnt do ne thing back den? just interesting coz i see it and hear it all da time in da states


Posted by totalcarnage on Jun-21-2001 23:02:

quote:
Originally posted by bluE_Neon
TC u live in LA and u have power...wow, inprovements i see, coz u prolly dat nothern California was gonna be short of power..actually they will be short 4 16 weeks i suppose? right? read it some article and da shortage is suppose 2 be in summer time as well, where they calculated about 16 hours of rolling blackouts each week from June through September hm, now Bush promised 2 do economical changes, blablabla..they knew a while ago dat dis will happen 2 dem and why they didnt do ne thing back den? just interesting coz i see it and hear it all da time in da states


It's not Bush's problem...it an asshole name Gov. Gray Davis Yes, we want bush to bail us out..but it is a state issue and the problem was created by the state..soo....

So far no blackouts..but I am sure they'll come when we least expect it.


Posted by bluE_Neon on Jun-21-2001 23:18:

quote:
So far no blackouts..but I am sure they'll come when we least expect it.


hehe dood how will u survive a day without TA?


Posted by Eugene on Jun-21-2001 23:31:

Hey trANCe ConTRoL!
First of all I want to tell you that you missed a good opportunity to win a good fortune, if I were you I would have pursued it.

That school principal who said you couldn't have glowsticks, he could be sued on the grounds of violating your FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, that's exactly the category this falls under. Having or not having a glowstick is self-expression.

You could have dragged him to court -- and even to the higher institutions if it had come to that -- and you would have WON, no question about it.

This is one of the core, oldest American idea(l)s ever... and every court decision is based on the Bill of Rights.

No one can violate your freedom of speech, expression, and beliefs here, period. I don't know about you, but that's why I moved here.


Posted by StereoPrincess on Jun-22-2001 00:10:

quote:
Originally posted by Eugene
This is one of the core, oldest American idea(l)s ever... and every court decision is based on the Bill of Rights.

No one can violate your freedom of speech, expression, and beliefs here, period. I don't know about you, but that's why I moved here.


that's the whole arrguement. the freedom of expression is being violated because glowsticks are being banned in local areas in the states. that's what the article is saying.


Posted by Eugene on Jun-22-2001 00:23:

Let me quote myself...

quote:
Originally posted by Eugene
I don't know about you, but that's why I moved here.


Hell, that's why Aaanold moved here! LOL


Posted by TrAnCe CoNtRoL on Jun-22-2001 03:38:

next time we have a dance (which will be in september when school starts back up), and he says "no glowsticks" ill bring it up.


Posted by beroshima on Jun-22-2001 05:10:

Thumbs down

quote:
Originally posted by totalcarnage


Yup, you are absolutley right...just remember we are a democracy with checks and balances...he doesn't make all the decisions 'round here.


Well, he sorta does. We live in a two party, bi-partisan system, meaning two parties exist, believe in what they believe, and everyone elected under their umbrella sticks to that. Zero independent thought.

In this scenario / our reality, Bush gets elected, heads up 'tougher drug enforcement laws', adds a new drug czar, which also bleeds to the republican-dominated supreme court delegitimizing pot growers in Cali, tougher penaties going into state senates, and anti-rave laws in my local city. Checks and balances? Its totally corrupted. As part of the party unity, they all stick together and support each other, regardless of their own beliefs...

What the dominating party believes, goes. They all vote the same. Sounds more like a dictatorship to me...

Now, i'm not saying Bush is the source of the problem - its the whole party + the political system its present in. Its like a monster with no head, with no connection to the people at all. At least the press is finally admitting to 'losing the war on drugs', and the waste of money it is.

Repression/Denial/Prohibition is the worst thing there is: whether it is drug usage, sexual orientation, even eating disorders. It just increases the usage, makes it out of control. To minimize, at least control social diseases it needs to be out in the open. Psychologists have proof of this.

This country is so backwards...


Posted by TrAnCe CoNtRoL on Jun-22-2001 05:12:

wait if i sued my school on grounds of freedom of expression because they wouldnt let us use glowsticks why isnt anyone pressing freedom of expression and take this to court. even though you would probably lose because you are fighting the government.


Posted by u4ea:[soulstar] on Jun-22-2001 05:33:

quote:
Originally posted by twilochik
ummm...just wanted to point out that this took place in new orleans in a local court. so all you peeps bashing gw bush better learn something about our government....gw has nothing to do with law making like this...and this was done in the local state court not a national court...such as the supreme court so he has nothing to do with this. and even if this went to the supreme court to become a national thing he still would have nothing to do with it....it would then fall into the hands of the supreme court justices. all this article is saying is that this is a trend among local courts and could become a national thing. don't blame gw...he has nothing to do with it. blame the judges and who hand down these laws! And remember to vote...yeah your thinking what does it matter....but if you don't vote then you got no right to complain....and what about writing to your representatives in congress....all states have 2 senators and numerous reps. send them a line and tell them what you think instead of bitching on the board.


Bush is the problem, though nothing related to the rights being violated in some states. Its evidence is in his foreign, economic, and national defence policies. In short, I don't think he knows what he's doing, the american public is not liking it the way he handles international affairs. not to menion the senate is a mess, split down the middle, hoping for bipartisan cooperation is going to be hard.


Posted by JM on Jun-22-2001 06:01:

Jester

quote:
Originally posted by goldenarmZ
Somebody needs to assassinate George Dubbya Bush before he fucks america up for good. (I'm not american.. can I still get the death penalty for saying that?.. I don't care)


i think you're OK...not a direct threat , just stating your opinion and here we got this thing called "freedom of speech" which is kinda bad when annoying ppl open their mouth....

>JM<


Posted by bug_bite on Jun-26-2001 21:36:

I didn't realize this topic had already been posted so I am going to copy and paste my own response to this issue into this thread. But first, you guys are really missing the most important part of this. Yes loosing your rights to self-expression suck but more importantly if you read the article and all the restrictions being placed on promoters you will see that SAFETY is the biggest issue here.

The article says that some promoters are getting rid of chill rooms because the gov says people do drugs in them, not having medics because that's admitting you know there are drugs going on, not allowing groups like dancesafe to set up booths because that is promoting "safe" drug use, not even pumping in extra air conditioning because they say that means kids are on drugs, banning ecstacy tests so that a kid doesn't accidently take PMA which could kill them because *apparently* this will stop kids from doing drugs (more like more kids will die from taking something that isn't e)...yah, now there are some safe ideas.

Well on the positive side of things one small thing will come out of this for the New Orleans party scene at least, a really decent underground movement will spring up with less young kids, and less uneducated people who abuse their drugs not use them...so maybe in a way things will be safer at "raves". But then again what about the kids who start doing their drugs at house parties with no medics. The only "rave-drug" related death they've had in Winnipeg (where rave culture has been strong for 7 years) was a girl who took e, 6 morphine pills, and tylenol 3's at a house party and her friends were too scared to take her to the hospital. As a parent what's better? Having your kid overdose at a rave and live because there were medics there or die at a house party because his/her friends are too afraid to do anything about it and figure the kid will just "sleep it off"? Yah, way to go New Orleans...this is really going to save lives.

They're right on one hand tho, kids will stop doing drugs, but not for the reasons they say. They will stop doing drugs because legislation like this is going to mean a lot more kids are going to die over the next couple years and unfortunately it's going to take a lot of deaths before kids become scared of using drugs again. I mean, if they want to slow drug use by putting kids in danger and using scare tactics and leaving more parents childless then they're taking the right route. Whatever happened to protecting our children and ensuring they're safe? I guess the new logic is "you get what's coming to you". Good thing the American government is really on their toes with this one. Next thing you know they'll be banning images of tattoos because they promote reckless behavior...or lightbulbs.

The article is long but I urge you to read through it if you're concerned at all with the implications of this. If we loose our rave culture that means we loose our potential of seeing amazing artists, the young kids - our little brothers and sisters - are going to start overdosing at house parties because there's noone to keep them safe or informed, a promoter who wants to bring in talent could be sent to jail for 25 years even if the event was 100% drug-free. We need to fight for our right to dance, it's too bad our culture isn't large enough to take to the streets like what happened in the UK. But we can still make a difference. Promoters, harm-reduction groups, djs, producers, and lawyers all over North America are urging informed, researched, and well written rebuttals be sent to the local governments of the communities that are facing problems at this time. While the US is by far facing more serious issues, cities in Canada are fast catching up, with some cities not allowing dancesafe groups already. I've been lucky enough to not loose any friends to drugs but I know people who have and not one of them died at a rave or a club, these are safe havens and we need to ensure they don't disappear.

Thanks for your time, if you feel this is as important as I do please pass the URL of the article on and urge people to speak up. If you have parents or business owners who are willing to support this issue please ask them to speak up as well.


-Abegael Drake
[email protected]


Posted by twilochik on Jun-27-2001 00:51:

Worm Popper *clap clap*

Well said Bug Bite!! Kudos! You've got the best approach...presenting your ideas in well thought out, conscise paragraphs. It's writing like yours that will make governments take notice that the people who listen to electronica are not just dumb kids gobbling drugs. The more we present ourselves as a united front who hava ideas and solutions that are backed by sound reasoning the more likely our cause will be heard and won.


Posted by Romp on Jun-27-2001 03:07:

Thumbs down

twilochick, just because it happened in a local court doesnt mean that GW Bush has nothing to do with it. Do you think this stuff would be happening if not for his views and his policies? It may not be a direct result of laws that his administration has made, but it is certainly an indirect result.

What is done at a national level has permutations at a state and local level, ESPECIALLY when the Republican Party has power at that level, since they are most likely going to agree with Bush's policies.

I bet that if Al Gore had been elected this wouldnt be happening (at least not to the same extent) and thats not to say Gore is great or anything, its just a fact.


Posted by Omni on Jun-27-2001 03:13:

You guys should see how bad Texas is...

That's a president from our state...it's rediculous. There were so many busts, etc. etc. for the year leading up to his election.


Posted by Romp on Jun-27-2001 03:46:

yea I spent about a year in Texas 2 years ago, on Student Exchange at UT. Austin is a nice city generally, pity about the fucked up laws and administration in Texas.


Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.