2003... Trance Reborn - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- 2003... Trance Reborn
Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Posted by MykonosBoy22 on Nov-21-2003 21:27:

Its pretty wild, especially here in Nyc, I can recall a number of djs coming here, quite a few , but nothing like november and december this time around, eveeeeryone is here, its just insane, the demand to hear them has risen greatly, and even in the streets all u hear is trance and house, as opposed to fifty cent.. its the New Frontier

Posted by mizzuno on Nov-21-2003 21:29:

quote:
Originally posted by m0sh
Hmmm 2003 was the rise of the progressive trance for sure.

But for the "trance" what so called club trance (or uplifting for pplz who don't know the meaning) is was a bad year IMO, I just listened to most of the club trance and got bored...meh

Prog trance owned all.

Uh i'm not sure where you've been but 2003 was more like 99 than ever far from the year of progressive...2001 was year of progressive thats why i was so sleepy all the time...

Mizzuno

Posted by djstaticburn on Nov-21-2003 22:21:

well march is gonna be dope

william orbit - barbers agidao for strings (tiesto rmx)

and a new rank 1 track i cant remember the name of atm

not to mention i think tiesto is doing a artist album, but i think that just may be a rumour not sure yet

Static

Posted by Gladius on Nov-21-2003 22:56:

quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
Music is timeless, the year is insignificant.

agree

Posted by satelites on Nov-21-2003 23:09:

let the good times roll......

Posted by Ibiza Dreams on Nov-21-2003 23:10:

quote:
Originally posted by satelites
let the good times roll......

amen

Posted by Toufas on Nov-21-2003 23:49:

great year it was yes....
but we saw a lot of bandwagoners jumping on this genre....i dont like it..and i dont like the fact that we will see more people like that....
/me puts on his flame proof vest

Posted by pvd420 on Nov-22-2003 01:09:

i think it's up to those of us who have been listening to trance for a while to give all the bandwagoners guidance and help them discover the deep meaning behind trance and how complex it really is. everyone who gets into trance has to get a start at some point.

i agree that this was a very good year, definately not as good as 1999. for me it seems that the majority of the songs that i end up liking are being played heavily when i go to shows in the late spring through mid fall.

for some reason a lot of the stuff i hear during the winter doesnt impress me too much. i am looking forward to 2004 though.

Posted by Toufas on Nov-22-2003 01:56:

yes i agree but bandwagoners jump genre every 2 months
ffs even their "favorite" djs change every week

Posted by dj tek on Nov-22-2003 02:15:

quote:
Originally posted by mizzuno
The worst year for trance was 2001...when progressive was all the rage
2002 people came back to their senses (aka solar stone, ronski speed etc etc)
2003....trance is far from dead much to the chagrin of progressive heads...

Mizzuno

i love progressive and i love trance !

Posted by dj tek on Nov-22-2003 02:17:

the only thing is, i wish they stop releasing new versions of classics.. i mean if its done well, its tolerable but some tracks jut dont need a makeover.. its a classic and should be left alone.. i totally dont see a point of making a remake of carte blanche.. that was totally uncalled for.

Posted by IpLaYWiTLiGhTs on Nov-22-2003 03:21:

quote:
Originally posted by dj tek
the only thing is, i wish they stop releasing new versions of classics.. i mean if its done well, its tolerable but some tracks jut dont need a makeover.. its a classic and should be left alone.. i totally dont see a point of making a remake of carte blanche.. that was totally uncalled for.

well see...the thing about that is that it gives teh nOObs a chance to get a peice of the action that they were too late for.

It also revives the song...reminding teh "elders" how damn good it was, bringing back memories...

Pages (2): « 1 [2]