TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Producers Promotion
-- Oceanlab Feat. Justine Suissa - Satellite (Deepdream Remix)
Pages (2): « 1 [2]


Posted by Zero Frequency on Feb-10-2004 05:26:

quote:
Originally posted by State of Matter
It's just the inflections in the singer's voice lead you to think that there is more left, so without the baby (which I agree is corny) they sound incomplete.


I know what you mean. It was quite hard to cut the vocals so that they would sound "as natural as possible"...

Actually on some parts there are Justine's "breaths" (or what's the word? ) left but thank god I managed to hide those in the mix among the instruments.


Posted by elena on Feb-11-2004 04:53:

wow honestly, this is great.
im not very good with the technicalities of producing but i really enjoyed this. definitely a good job with the removal of the "baby's"
however i think the last bit when the breaks kick in sounds a bit rough and forced. once theyre actually on it's fine, just that inital phase is a bit weird.

cheers


Posted by dj_alucard on Feb-12-2004 05:52:

sounds good

i think the vocals could have been textured into the tune a bit better...the missing baby is weird mostly because we have all heard the baby too much prolly...and ther is an ominous space where it should be

the rest is nice


Posted by JohnOC on Feb-12-2004 11:38:

not what i was expecting at all...

personally i dont think the breakbeats work and i couldnt really see any DJ playing this?

great production though


Posted by Zero Frequency on Feb-12-2004 14:19:

quote:
Originally posted by JohnOC
...i couldnt really see any DJ playing this?

great production though


Except a breakbeat-DJ maybe?

Or maybe this is too trancey for a breakbeat-DJ and for a trance-DJ this isn't "straight beat" enough?

I guess that's actually pretty much why this isn't in the TOP15. I managed to do an unplayable track.

But thanks for comments.


Posted by JohnOC on Feb-13-2004 16:16:

you said it jussi
great ideas...but just not flexible enough for the DJs


Posted by Nell on Feb-13-2004 16:23:

sounds fuckin amazing and sound totally mint without that really annoying 'baby' vocal which sounds so uk dance pop'ish. I'd buy this! i say remove the vocal and share a full dub version so no copywright involved, sounds phat as hell mate!


Posted by iLLicit on Feb-13-2004 16:40:

quote:
Originally posted by Nell
sounds fuckin amazing and sound totally mint without that really annoying 'baby' vocal which sounds so uk dance pop'ish. I'd buy this! i say remove the vocal and share a full dub version so no copywright involved, sounds phat as hell mate!


Agree!!!


Posted by Zero Frequency on Feb-13-2004 17:21:

quote:
Originally posted by JohnOC
you said it jussi
great ideas...but just not flexible enough for the DJs


Yeah... I kind of realised that already when making this track. But I still decided to make it as it is.

There's lots of good danceable remixes so let's say that this is then the one you'd listen to at home, or something.

Cheers again for comments everybody.


Posted by Black-Dragon on Feb-13-2004 19:35:

AMAZING AMAZING AMAZING
nice breakbeat!!
this is a great remix..don't remove the vocals..
remember you can also make a VOCAL MIX and a DUB MIX


Cheerz.


Posted by RaVeRSurGe_NYTA on Feb-13-2004 23:15:

didnt like it.... i think it lacks a buildup.... markus schulz mix/a&b mix are better.... claps and hats are too quiet.


Posted by Zero Frequency on Feb-16-2004 15:29:

Yes, sure. Vocal and a dub mix, but it still doesn't fit a mix though...

Thanks for comments again.

I'm going to remove this from the server now, get it from other users if you still want to hear it.


Posted by sym on Feb-17-2004 14:25:

damn i wanted to listen, anybody willing to send it this way?


Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.