TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Australia
-- TWO TRIBES Sydney Wrap up.
Pages (2): « 1 [2]


Posted by eRRaTiK on Mar-08-2004 10:16:

my pics here


Posted by Joshva on Mar-08-2004 10:17:

quote:
Originally posted by matt_a
One of the few occasions during the night where i took my earplugs out!
IT WAS SWEEEEEEET!


^^^
Lol i had to take out the ear plugs heaps for Hixxy and Scott Brown


Posted by waXology on Mar-09-2004 11:13:

does anyone know if BT played "Force of Gravity" ??


Posted by Sid on Mar-09-2004 12:04:

quote:
Originally posted by waXology
does anyone know if BT played "Force of Gravity" ??


yep he did, it was towards the end of his set!


Posted by waXology on Mar-09-2004 12:07:

quote:
Originally posted by S_madis
yep he did, it was towards the end of his set!



DAMN!


Posted by Hyperdimension on Mar-09-2004 13:45:

I'm surprised to hear everyone saying BT was crap... what was everyone expecting? His smooth progressive house style?
I expected that he would play his new sounds (breaks/electro/rock), which I do not like, but I did not leave the room assoon as I heard these sounds, hoping that he would play his old style later on... which he did and I was very glad.

Did you guys who say that he was crap actually stay for his complete set?

I guess maybe you could say it was crap overall, but when Dreaming and Flaming June were on I it was great, because his old sounds like Flaming June were what I wanted to hear.


Posted by waXology on Mar-09-2004 14:58:

i dont think it was BT that was crap, just the fact the the whole night took a "Hard tech tracne electro techno" feel to it :P and then to brin BT so late it was like dancng so fast to dancing lke your not mooving.

i refer you to the moments when u go driving on a highway at 110kph for a long period of time then come back to normal streets at 60kph.... it feels extrmely slow doesnt it?

so yeah thats just how i felt and being that early in the morning it just made me go "bugger it" i heard a few tracks then left.

allthough force of gravity is great.. it doesnt compare to the Ferry corsten Bootleg OMFG!! :P


Posted by First Strike on Mar-10-2004 05:33:

quote:
Originally posted by waXology


allthough force of gravity is great.. it doesnt compare to the Ferry corsten Bootleg OMFG!! :P


Ferrys remix is gold, love that track !!!!


Posted by Hyperdimension on Mar-10-2004 13:23:

Yeah I think I understand you Cam... I went straight from hard and very fast trancecore (160+ bpm) in the Godspeed room to Christopher Lawrence's slow and soft progressive house (around 120 bpm). I was expecting much more driving trance but I didn't immediately leave because I was dedicated to staying it out in the hope that what I wanted will be delivered later on. It didn't happen with Christopher Lawrence, but it did happen with BT.


Posted by Ghostface on Mar-11-2004 09:36:

I told you Fergie was going to blow you all away.


Posted by Tranceilvania on Mar-11-2004 10:07:

So BT let you down Sydney ppl!!! Very strange indeed In Melbourne he made everyones Day/Night I've heard and actually I've recorded all of his set and it was awesome. Go figure!!??


Posted by eRRaTiK on Mar-11-2004 10:10:

quote:
Originally posted by waXology
i dont think it was BT that was crap


well he can't take all the credit. it was a case of... standard mixing. bad track selection. come on, even with lack of sleep or whatever BT should have known what hour it was.

i didn't expect greatness (as his style is not what it was back in the day nor is he reknowned for his dj'ng skills) so i wasn't disappointed too much, but throw an oakenfold or fleming (anyone @ GK.melb 02 will remember!) in that time slot and i bet it would have been a different story.


Posted by Hyperdimension on Mar-11-2004 11:24:

Erratik, he didn't actually DJ, he played live (or, as the promoters put it, "laptop symphony").

It was fun finding you in there and hanging with you anyway.


Posted by waXology on Mar-11-2004 11:27:

quote:
Originally posted by Tranceilvania
I've heard and actually I've recorded all of his set and it was awesome.



why isnt it shared!!

damn u melbournites are slefish!! sharing is caring!


Posted by eRRaTiK on Mar-12-2004 05:45:

quote:
Originally posted by Hyperdimension
Erratik, he didn't actually DJ, he played live (or, as the promoters put it, "laptop symphony").

It was fun finding you in there and hanging with you anyway.


good point! yeh man always great to party with you and the crew


Posted by gilmista on Mar-12-2004 06:00:

don't know if its been mentioned but apparently BT was held up at Sydney airport as they did not allow his equipment through customs for undisclosed reasons. Eventually though he got it through and made his way to Homebush.


Posted by JulesPLees on Mar-12-2004 08:17:

quote:
Originally posted by Ghostface
I told you Fergie was going to blow you all away.


I told you you were going to fall in love with techno.


Posted by surfrgal on Mar-13-2004 04:10:

quote:
Originally posted by Hyperdimension
Yeah I think I understand you Cam... I went straight from hard and very fast trancecore (160+ bpm) in the Godspeed room to Christopher Lawrence's slow and soft progressive house (around 120 bpm). I was expecting much more driving trance but I didn't immediately leave because I was dedicated to staying it out in the hope that what I wanted will be delivered later on. It didn't happen with Christopher Lawrence, but it did happen with BT.


I think you may have confused Christopher Lawrence with BT. Lawrence always plays 135 BPM+ - he does not play slow or progressive. Whereas BT is very progressive. They look similar, it's an easy mistake to make.


Posted by Hyperdimension on Mar-13-2004 05:59:

quote:
Originally posted by surfrgal
I think you may have confused Christopher Lawrence with BT. Lawrence always plays 135 BPM+ - he does not play slow or progressive. Whereas BT is very progressive. They look similar, it's an easy mistake to make.


Well I had entered Astrofunk at 3:30am thinking BT was on as stated in the timetable, but I didn't look up until webmeister said it wasn't BT but Christopher Lawrence, and I agreed it didn't look like BT, I know what BT looks like.

I agree with what you say about Christopher Lawrence, however the fact is he played much slower than what he is known for. And he definitely doesn't play rock/electro stuff, which is what was played at 5:30am by BT.


Posted by webmeister on Mar-14-2004 22:07:

quote:
Originally posted by surfrgal
I think you may have confused Christopher Lawrence with BT. Lawrence always plays 135 BPM+ - he does not play slow or progressive. Whereas BT is very progressive. They look similar, it's an easy mistake to make.


Trust me, we know which is which.

Besides, Chris Lawrence didn't play from a laptop, BT did


Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.