TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Album Reviews / New Releases Discussion
-- Tiesto feat BT - 'Love Comes Again'
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »


Posted by tiestoinmix on Mar-10-2004 18:16:

quote:
Originally posted by T-1000
BT's vocals dont really sit well with me


weird


Posted by TiksA on Mar-11-2004 00:43:

I really like it. I kinda thought the vocals might be abit off, it it sounds aight

Looking foward remixes and to hearing it live when Tiesto plays here May 2nd.


Posted by refuge on Mar-11-2004 00:55:

the cover art for tiesto's mix looks amazing....BUT, he looks like a flaming homo in that first picture..

/reZ


Posted by hooknife on Mar-11-2004 18:34:

quote:
Originally posted by AndskiSpeed
What a camp cover that is!


Its showing his softer side!


Posted by Pio on Mar-11-2004 22:08:

i don't like it. i hate the vocals, the production is aight.


Posted by AndskiSpeed on Mar-11-2004 22:18:

quote:
Originally posted by hooknife
Its showing his softer side!




quote:
Originally posted by YaleTrance
i don't like it. i hate the vocals, the production is aight.


Thank god someone who has the same view as me, I dont see whats so special bout this, and I know the melody of traffic wasnt exactly complicated but this is ridiculous!


Posted by refuge on Mar-12-2004 02:20:

NOT bad....It's one of those tiesto tracks that takes a while to grow on you. An example of this being Kane - Rain Down On Me (Tiesto Remix)

/reZ


Posted by Shahar on Mar-12-2004 16:30:

Re: Tiesto feat BT - 'Love Comes Again'

Great news brooooo !!!!!1
But I dont really understand whats the connection between tiesto and sahara..

quote:
Originally posted by Prism
Tiesto Mix
Solid Globe - 'Sahara'


...
?


Posted by Dazdaking on Mar-12-2004 16:39:

I don't see what the big fuss about this track is, sure its ok, but it's nothing ground-breaking


Posted by Shudder on Mar-12-2004 17:11:

just heard a preview on chemical... vocals are decent but that fact that tiesto is trying to make it sound all tech trancish kinda sux


Posted by mentalbarter on Mar-12-2004 18:23:

quote:
Originally posted by AndskiSpeed
What a camp cover that is!


nice smiley


Posted by raveed on Mar-12-2004 19:29:

me likes this one ... gonna be hooooj in the clubs


Posted by Spang on Mar-13-2004 02:13:

There is a sample of the Mark norman remix on chemical records forthcoming trance section. Sounds awsome


Posted by Psygnosis on Mar-13-2004 02:35:

Cheers Spang, just checked it... damn i'm so addicted to this song, that small sample didn't do justice to this song.

Everyone go listen to the sample on the Chem website, might change your opinion.. this is a definte buy


Posted by benchristopher on Mar-13-2004 02:38:

listen to the A-Side
listen to the B-Side


Posted by SuperFarStucker on Mar-13-2004 03:56:

Idea

I usually like Tiesto's productions but this one just doesn't seem very good. BT's vocals sound like Cher style vocoder wankery and the underlying track sounds a bit similar to traffic with a slightly different (techier?) edge to it. BT's vocals really do this track in...


Posted by ++ EGO ++ on Mar-13-2004 21:45:

Hollyy!Y!
Mark Norman's Remix is InSaNiTy!
I said it before, this track pwns me!


Posted by Al Cordero on Mar-14-2004 04:13:

CHEESE


Posted by Cobalt on Mar-14-2004 04:17:

The Mark Norman remix is pure fu�king ownage.

Original is, eh, okay. Sort of like a cheesy BT tune with the Traffic bassline.


Posted by ++ EGO ++ on Mar-14-2004 05:03:

quote:
Originally posted by Cobalt
Sort of like a cheesy BT tune



Posted by Cobalt on Mar-14-2004 05:19:

quote:
Originally posted by Provitex


You could be more constructive in your post than a single, pointless emoticon.

I was referring to his rather poor Emotional Technology work, particularly those with his vocals, not the other masterpieces that BT has forged. Don't generalize my words and be rude.


Posted by AndskiSpeed on Mar-14-2004 13:50:

quote:
Originally posted by mentalbarter
nice smiley


lol I nicked it from someones sig


Posted by Clyde77 on Mar-14-2004 14:53:

okay bt can be a good producer but not a singer!!! he needs to be hunh. flame if u want..
ill stick with normans mix or the dub if there is one.


Posted by fathomless1 on Mar-14-2004 19:42:

Without the vocals it is a good track. With the vocals (in my opinion) it is also a good track. I like his vocals in the tracks he has made recently.


Posted by refuge on Mar-14-2004 22:53:

.. this track has really taken its toll on me and i've grown quite attached to it .. =)


Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.