TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- Producers Studios
Pages (2): « 1 [2]


Posted by Timothy on Nov-26-2004 13:36:

quote:
Originally posted by electron
Funny you should say that. I just bought the DVD and watched it last nite. Yup, besides watching Tiesto grinning non stop i get to see what's in his studio!
So far i can make out.. Alesis Andromeda and Korg Karma. I can't see if he's got a virus or JP8000 tho. Can't make out the speakers either but they are definitely KRK's. (yellow cones)


Tiesto's gear:

Pc
Intel Pentium 4/3.2 Ghz w/1,024 MB Ram

Monitors
KRK 8000-series

Mengtafel
Sony DMX-R100 48-channel digital console w/digital switchable patch bay for analog signal processing

Software
Steinberg Cubase Sx 2.0

Synth
Access Virus B, Virus C synths
Alesis Andromedia A6
E-mu Vintage Pro, proteus 2000 synths
Moog Music Minimoog Voyager
Yamaha CS6X, CS6R, FS1R, synths
Roland Alpha Juno 2, JD-990, JP-8000, JP8080 (2), MKS-80, XV-3080 synths
Korg Triton

Drum computers
Linn Electronics LinnDrum
Roland TR-909

Samplers
Akai S6000 2x
Akai MPC3000XL

Reverb's
Lexicon 480 rackmont
TC Electronic M-One rackmont

Digital delay
Roland SDE-3000

Converter
Yamaha MSS1 SMPTE/MTC

Sound module
Waldorf MicroWaveXT

Mixer
Pioneer DJM-600

Turntabels
Pioneer CDJ-1000
Technics SL-1200MK2 2x


Posted by electron on Nov-26-2004 13:52:

Timothy you are DA man! How did you manage to spot all that gear? But at least i was not wrong hehe.
Ok, im actually surprised to see that the No.1 and No.2 DJs in the world using KRK monitors ONLY (no 2nd set). I have to investigate this speaker further!
I know Ferry and Armin use the Mackie HR824s


Posted by Derivative on Nov-26-2004 15:54:

tbh, im surprised anyone needs all this gear. 2 jp8080s and a jp8000? why?! you dont have to bounce as much but...

i wonder if most of them know even one synth inside out cuz synths are complicated monsters. life consumingly so. just one, more often than not has a mind boggling variety of sonic possibilities. if i had 20 of the best id be in my studio all the time, grinning constantly. but i dont think id get very much done. wouldnt know where to start. wouldnt be inclined to scratch the surface of even 1 of the many toys that im surrounded by. but maybe thats just me.

a case of G.A.S? (Gear Aquisition Syndrome)


Posted by cheesy on Nov-26-2004 18:35:

quote:
Originally posted by electron
Timothy you are DA man! How did you manage to spot all that gear?

HERE


btw, here's more studio pictures: http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...&threadid=39389


Posted by thecYrus on Nov-26-2004 19:13:

btw tiesto is not a producer he's "only" a dj! he doesn't produce the things under his name. that's done by different producers..

so long
cYrus


Posted by Derivative on Nov-26-2004 19:57:

really? i would have thought he would have at least some input. i mean. production is so important. how can you control every aspect of the music you write if you dont produce your own tracks?!


Posted by thecYrus on Nov-26-2004 20:10:

it works the same way like the pop business.. there are producer which do some tunes and the labels are looking for the tunes which fit to the singer..


Posted by Subtle on Nov-27-2004 00:59:

quote:
Originally posted by thecYrus
it works the same way like the pop business.. there are producer which do some tunes and the labels are looking for the tunes which fit to the singer..
i dont believe that is true, i mean trance is a dying music genre, it hardly sells anything no more, why should "proffesional" producers want to help artists like Tiesto etc. make their music... it aint excactly multim-million dollar buisness.. but at some point i do agree.. but I mean... they HAVE to make some of the music.. I have even heard Ferry Corsten also being accused of "not" producing his music.. but it cannot be true.. he has been making music since he was 14 or something..


Posted by Derivative on Nov-27-2004 01:17:

you may well be right cyrus, cuz im not too well up on what these people are doing. but when you muck around with synths and make electronic based music, it just seems natural that you would produce your own work. when you build synth patches thats production in a way. i find it hard to believe that he lets some joe producer handle the entire engineering process of his songs. engineering and song writing in electronic music are like 2 halves of the same coin.

pop music has this generic quality to it, this anonymity that screams 'this tune was written by person A who mailed the lyrics and notes to manager B who sent them to producer C who passed it onto his engineering colleague D.' it sounds empty cuz theres so many people involved in the making of a pop record and its extremely well produced but nobody has stamped their individuality on the tune. nobody in essence, follows through with their idea for the song, from conception to completion. thats why i feel that alot of pop consists of a mish mash of established styles and generic techniques both in musical and production terms. you get the impression that in some cases, the people making the tune dont really care that much about it. like its just a job. as far as you can tell all this from a song without seeming like jumping the gun.

stuff like urban train though has this real kind of energy to it. i dunno. maybe its just me. i dont think it could have been an entirely anonymous process like certain types of really manufactured pop.


Posted by thecYrus on Nov-27-2004 01:33:

no, tiesto does nothing for the "tiesto-tunes". he doesn't design synth-patches or writes melodies, lyrics, ... he only gives ideas/feedback from the dj gigs to the producers.


Posted by Derivative on Nov-27-2004 01:39:

so why does he have a studio full of equipment that turns pretty much everyone here, green with envy? why do the producers not get a credit in the title of the collaboration if they are essentially the song writers? i could understand maybe if they wanted to capitalise on the man's good looks and/or his charisma to sell records but hes fugly and from what i hear a twat aswell. so its not one of those reasons.


Posted by Subtle on Nov-27-2004 02:13:

quote:
Originally posted by thecYrus
no, tiesto does nothing for the "tiesto-tunes". he doesn't design synth-patches or writes melodies, lyrics, ... he only gives ideas/feedback from the dj gigs to the producers.
yeh.. that makes real good sense..

I bet that in the old days.. he hadd someone to "make" the tracks "Stray Dog - Chapter Two" and "Allure - Rejected" ...

and credited his real name "Tijs Verwest" as the producer..

just so he could get really famous.. come on.. he makes music.. accept it!

in the old days trance producers liked to use aliases for their tracks.. nowadays.. they are only using their own names.. like Ferry Corsten, Armin van Buuren..


Posted by wink on Nov-27-2004 03:04:

Actually you just have to read the fine print on his records. There are other producers doing records for tiesto. If you read magazines where tiesto talks about production it's hilarious. He has no idea what he's talking about. I remember reading a REMIX awhile back and he was talking about how important and how much fun turning the release knob is to make his tracks sound wide and big. It was just funny because it's soo obvious. The same is true with Sasha.. He hires tons of other producers to help him write all his material. Just read you guys!! I'll try and find some links online.


Posted by wink on Nov-27-2004 03:06:

I'm sure Tiesto has a studio full of equiptment because he got tired of renting out both the studio engineers, producers and physical studio space with equiptment. So now he just hires the engineers and producers to help him in his own.


Posted by electron on Nov-27-2004 05:56:

quote:
Originally posted by thecYrus
btw tiesto is not a producer he's "only" a dj! he doesn't produce the things under his name. that's done by different producers..

so long
cYrus


I just watched his DVD 'a day at the office' and in the interview he describes how he did the lead part in the track Flight 643 and how he changed it from a melodic tune to just using a single note for the lead. And also, most of his songs have a similar kind of structure. Don't know if your statement is entirely true, maybe he uses other producers for the polishing up but he definitely has input. I still wish he would have done everything tho


Posted by Derivative on Nov-27-2004 16:03:

i guess im just a bit shocked cuz urban train was one of the songs i studied voluntarily. tried to replicate all of the synths and rhythym patterns and effectively rebuild the track from scratch to see how it worked and how i could make my tunes better. i did the same with for an angel and saltwater. oh well. i guess that makes me a better producer than tiesto. ha!


Posted by auujay on Nov-27-2004 16:47:

Why does this always happen. When some person (DJ/producer) gets famous everyone suddenly assumes they don't make their own tunes, or even worse, never did.

While I am aware that Sasha usually gets a fair amount of support with his tracks (if you read the song credits it is usually him and at least someone else) and it would not supprise me if Tiesto does not have as nearly an active role in his producitons as he used to. But I find it beyond comprehension that people think simply because they are famous they can't produce. Scooter is another example, of course I am not a fan of their "music" but I don't get why people find it so hard to believe that they actually produce the songs. Scooter has the skills if you look at Ratty and I don't hear people claiming they didn't really produce that track.

Anyway, I guess I have made my point. I might understand if people are making the argument that Tiesto is not as involved as he used to be but to say "tiesto is not a producer he's "only" a dj! he doesn't produce the things under his name." Please...

PS - I am not a huge Tiesto fan and I know Traffic has the same "melody/lead" as some old techno tune.


Posted by Derivative on Nov-27-2004 22:10:

the stuff off scooter's 'and the beat goes on' is really good i thought. songs like waiting for spring and rhapsody in e were awesome. ive got the cd and they are creditted as the writers and producers. its showing its age in production terms but it was great for the time it was released.


Posted by thoughtlessjex on Nov-28-2004 00:43:

quote:
I'm sure Tiesto has a studio full of equiptment because he got tired of renting out both the studio engineers, producers and physical studio space with equiptment. So now he just hires the engineers and producers to help him in his own.


I don't even like Tiesto all that much, but I have to say that you don't seem to really know what you're talking about.

First off, auujay's right about making the assumptions you're making in the first place. I'm going to sort of bring it around further to say that not only did they have to start out on their own, but when they got big, they could afford to have someone else do the annoying parts. That's what the sound engineers are for. Personally, I'd rather have someone else master my tracks because it's a tedious and frustrating process that really only makes me hate the track.

quote:
he was talking about how important and how much fun turning the release knob is to make his tracks sound wide and big.


That's certainly what it sounds like he's doing.

quote:
Actually you just have to read the fine print on his records.


Maybe you should do the same. If you did, you'd see that for every track where someone else's name appears in the writing, composition and production credits, "Tiesto" appears right there with him/her.


Posted by Derivative on Nov-28-2004 01:25:

id like to see that interview with the release knob. cuz envelope release doesnt make sounds become wider or bigger. the release rotary on the amp envelope determines the rate at which a note decays to 0 volume after the note is released. theres also one for the filter that controls the rate at which the filter cutoff releases.

sounds become wide when you hard pan them left and right together or alter its position in the stereo field with stereo separation. or they can sound wide if you modulate the phase of a sound which can make certain parts of a sound appear to sound further away or closer to you depending on what other frequencies are in opposite phase. or you can make sounds bigger by detuning, increasing the number of oscillators or the number of voices per oscillator or by forcing a sound to alias, or by making a mid range cut on an EQ whilst bringing up the highs and lows which makes the sound have a separate high and low component.

although i find it incredibly hard to believe that tiesto doesnt do any of his own production or never did any of his own production in the first place, suggesting that the release rotary makes sound wide and big is ridiculous.


Posted by meDina on Nov-29-2004 06:47:

wow im surprised how much some of these people know about tiesto and other famous producer/dj's you would think it was tiesto himself revealing his secrets lol... i supposed you want to tell me that bt cant "really" edit audio for shit now too right?


Posted by electron on Nov-29-2004 08:43:

Ferry Corsten's Studio. I still can't find it! Does anyone have photos or his kitlist?


Posted by Derivative on Nov-29-2004 09:12:

his kitlist is here:

http://www.vintagesynth.org/index2.html

go to archives at the top of the page, then artist profiles.

dont know where you can get any studio pics though.


Posted by electron on Nov-29-2004 09:54:

quote:
Originally posted by Derivative
his kitlist is here:

http://www.vintagesynth.org/index2.html

go to archives at the top of the page, then artist profiles.

dont know where you can get any studio pics though.


Thanks for the link. Unfortunately, i have seen that one. If you read carefully you will notice that he is the only one of the Artists on the artist profile to NOT mention his equipment list. It's very very hard to know what he is using and i have searched everywhere.


Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.