TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Relationship q (NOT advice)
Pages (2): « 1 [2]
If she was completely devoted to me I could really go after her. Shed be meek and submissive in like a week. So B.
Re: Relationship q (NOT advice)
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DigiNut I was privy to a neat little public spectacle today of a guy telling off his girlfriend (both of whom were complete strangers to me, FYI, this happened in a coffee shop), and it got me thinking... Say you had to pick between one of two extremes: A: A total slut that's a constant source of fun and/or comfort for you... and for anyone and everyone else who happens to be in the vicinity; or B: A bitch/jackass who seems entirely devoted to you but is demanding, possessive, jealous, and often treats you wrong. Assuming all other personality aspects are equal, which would you pick? I know there are probably some "balanced" people, but I would say that most are leaning at least a little bit toward either A or B, which makes sense because if your significant other doesn't require too much attention from you, there's a good chance they're getting it somewhere else. I'm curious to everyone's opinion - both from the guys and gals here. |
i would go with A, until something better came along.
A
i'd probably go with B.
i see it like this. if i don't care for the person then why would i be dating them? i know some do, but not me. so if she's that serious...that's fine with me (and actually of the two i'm probably more like B myself hehee).
I choose... A!
and B!
"A" can't be mad I'm screwing other people and since "B" is an asshole, "B" deserves to be cheated on (with of course my every attempt not to let "B" know I have "A").
| quote: |
| Originally posted by xGirlx I choose... A! and B! "A" can't be mad I'm screwing other people and since "B" is an asshole, "B" deserves to be cheated on (with of course my every attempt not to let "B" know I have "A"). |
Well, at least now I know who to avoid here.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DigiNut Funny how a lot of people base their answers on what they think they can change... I think in reality you very rarely can change the way people behave, at least not in the long term. |
Option A
Being in a relationship with a moody/bitchy person is absolutely draining emotionally especially if there are strong feelings involved. I'd rather not go through it and just have some fun for the moment, knowing that there's no commitment so that if the right person does come along you have nothing to hold you back.
A all the way!
B is the least of two evils. At least she is yours. Bitchy part can be tamed. It all depends what kind of man are you. If she treats you like trash, then it all depends on you to change her.
If you treated like trash and live with it, blame yourself. It�s the choice you made. If you stay with someone because of comfort and this person happens to be slut � more power to you. At some point some people refuse to deal with cocks and ****s�this is when nice slut comes handy. Man or women�same story.
...so it's A all the way!!!
As much as I would hate to have a woman that was nailing other guys, I could not stand a total psycho bitch when we're together, no matter how devoted she was to me... so I would have to say I'm leaning towards A.
My best friends boyfriends ex-girlfriend, they had it for them. I called him like once to ask a question. The cellphone stayed on and she was like "who the f*** was that!!!!" are you cheating on me? she was like stfu! I felt so bad for him. He's emo and a mama's boy like heinz, so he was just like....what????!!!!!!!!
...heh, heh.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by trancepixie17 My best friends boyfriends ex-girlfriend, they had it for them. I called him like once to ask a question. The cellphone stayed on and she was like "who the f*** was that!!!!" are you cheating on me? she was like stfu! I felt so bad for him. He's emo and a mama's boy like heinz, so he was just like....what????!!!!!!!! ...heh, heh. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DigiNut Shut the fuck up, this has nothing to do with the thread nor does it have anything to do with anything else anyone said in the thread. And what's more, nobody cares. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DigiNut Interesting responses. So no guys are in favour of the booty call relationship? Having a girl who you can just call up, have a good time, and forget about later? I'm surprised! I never said it had to be a long-term or intimate relationship, although whether or not you want a long-term one will obviously factor into whether you pick A or B. Sluts turning into good girls is a contentious point to me. It may happen naturally over time, over a LONG time, but if I find out that the girl I'm going out with is a slut, I'd call her maybe 3 YEARS later not 3 days. Bitches turning into good girls... maybe. Like Beh said, they have to really want this and that means they have to be able to empathize. It's something that I would again say takes years, not days. I am pretty damn assertive when it comes to these things, but it seems like some people you just can't reason with. You ask them to show a little more consideration and they basically walk off.Personally I think I'd rather have the "A". As time goes by I've grown some balls and learned how to put my foot down when a girl acts whorish - and if I decide to cut her loose, I feel good about it, not remorseful. But fighting in private all the time really sucks, I think it wears you out and you get sick of it eventually, and if things finally hit rock bottom then the breakup can be very painful and when you see them a few days/weeks later it's like... oh god, why did she have to be here. Just my thoughts though - everybody continue, please. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by drgoodvibe Let the bad ones walk off, there really is no sense in crying over worthless girls, when there are so many amazing ones out there. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Arbiter You're missing the point of the question. He isn't advocating either of these options as desirable, or even acceptable. Rather, he's trying to get people to think about which would be better and which would be worse in a hypothetical absence of other options. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by drgoodvibe my whole point was that its impossible to ever be left with only those two options.. there's no point to this hypothetical exercise. |
It's not related in any way to my personal dealings and it definitely wasn't a call for advice. The question of the extremes is a more direct way of asking people what they value more in a relationship - a good time, or a sense of security.
i dont know. good question indeed. im more of a B type (im not a girl but this personality applies to guys as well) so i guess im more understanding of my kind of type.
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.