TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Islam: A Defective Civilization?
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »


Posted by hausmusic on May-20-2004 19:53:

Umm NO... thats a western misconseption which try and separate them,
they are historicly different Political Parties, the only way they would be different sects is if they had some substantial differences in religion, which they dont. Both believe in the same book both inter-marry.
Shiites believe that the person who took control of the Islamic Kalifate after the passing of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh)wasnt rightfully chosen. So they are basicly the opposing party.
With 1.2 Billion muslims in the world theyr bound to have difference of opinion.


Posted by Q5echo on May-20-2004 20:49:

quote:
Originally posted by hausmusic
Umm NO... thats a western misconseption which try and separate them,
they are historicly different Political Parties, the only way they would be different sects is if they had some substantial differences in religion, which they dont. Both believe in the same book both inter-marry.
Shiites believe that the person who took control of the Islamic Kalifate after the passing of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh)wasnt rightfully chosen. So they are basicly the opposing party.
With 1.2 Billion muslims in the world theyr bound to have difference of opinion.


Umm yeah...to delineate the branches of Islam to only represent political parties and not recognize the true religious differences is shortsided on your part.
Is it minor? Yes, but does little to legitimize your point of view.IMO


Posted by DrUg_Tit0 on May-20-2004 20:58:

quote:
Originally posted by hausmusic
Umm NO... thats a western misconseption which try and separate them,
they are historicly different Political Parties, the only way they would be different sects is if they had some substantial differences in religion, which they dont. Both believe in the same book both inter-marry.
Shiites believe that the person who took control of the Islamic Kalifate after the passing of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh)wasnt rightfully chosen. So they are basicly the opposing party.
With 1.2 Billion muslims in the world theyr bound to have difference of opinion.


Hmm, actually there were 4 kaliphs who inherited Muhammed's rule, but shiites recognized only one, Ali, as a legitimate successor since he was Muhammed's heir. Unlike sunnis, shiites believe in the Imamah system, that is they consider that after Muhammed assigned the first Imam, there can only be one Imam who is a supreme muslim leader as well as being sinless and appointed by god. After the 12th imam disappeared, they didn't have a religious leader until the arrival oh Homeini. Besides, it's paradoxical to have an opposing party in a theocracy. You can only have an opposing sect.


Posted by ShadoWolf on May-21-2004 05:05:

quote:
Originally posted by malek
wasn't the islamic-arabic empire the most developped scientifically, culturaly and economically for a long period of time?

obviously it can work because it already proved itself.


no, they stole most of their ideas from the Romans


Posted by Psygnosis on May-21-2004 07:12:

quote:
Originally posted by occrider
Well actually the US was a supporter of Shah Reza Muhammad Pahlavi. What technology are we talking about?



Well that would be a desire of the east, not the west. But you're misinterpreting the point that the author is trying to make. He's not saying that the west does not have ambitions to rule the world, he's saying that the west does rule the world and hence projects a certain sense of arrogance. He's accusing Islam of not ruling the world, and being outraged, or whatever, that it's not.

Anyway good post renegade.


The advancement technology, they had all high advancements in military and society.. i can say Iran looked like US. They had a Air Force, Navy base and all those. When the Shah was in control he improved life of the persians and the whole Islam view.

Now i find it stupid again at how he calls Islam ignorant when he claims that the west already rule the world, pffft. West don't rule anything other their own land.

Reverend_Trance : Sure the writer is entitled to his own opinion but you said you ignored post that went against him, how stupid can you get. So your actually following his stupid comments and ruling out everyone elses opinion. We are entitled to our opinion too, so respect it.

Another thing, Islam was the strongest civilisation ever, has people read those history books? All facts say that Persia was the first strong nation ever but it doesn't say why it crumbled. If it was doing so well before, what went wrong. The US interfered, thats what. AND that my fellow TAs is the reason why Islam hates US. This whole terrorism nonsense is stupid and inaccurate. Islam is far from being terrorist.

The very fact Iran lost it's power in this game, US throwing the Shah into exile and bringing in a convicted criminal (Ayotallah) to rule the country, US very well knew that Iran would crumble without a vision in the leaders mind.


Posted by Psygnosis on May-21-2004 07:14:

quote:
Originally posted by ShadoWolf
no, they stole most of their ideas from the Romans


pfft who told you that, Persians actually beat the romans back then and remained the strongest civilisation. Alexander the great then beat Persia.. but married a persian himself (couldn't resist the beauty of persians )


Posted by DrUg_Tit0 on May-21-2004 21:31:

Erm, well, Persia was one of the firs strong nations, however that was about 3000 years before islam. And Alexander came before the Romans started their expansion outside of the apennine peninsula.


Posted by torontotrance on May-21-2004 22:53:

I agree with some point of the original thread

without oil, the middle east is fucked, that is true and some other things about islam.


Posted by occrider on May-22-2004 09:13:

quote:
Originally posted by Psygnosis
The very fact Iran lost it's power in this game, US throwing the Shah into exile and bringing in a convicted criminal (Ayotallah) to rule the country, US very well knew that Iran would crumble without a vision in the leaders mind.


Where are you getting this? The US supported the shah. Are you sayign that the US toppled Mohammed Mossadeq for nothing, brought into power teh ayotollah who subsequentely declared jihad against the United States, And supported Iraq in the Iran-Iraq war for shits and giggles??? Or is this all an elaborate scheme to conceal the fact that the US wanted to remove a pro-western/pro-US leader from power?


Posted by DrUg_Tit0 on May-22-2004 09:48:

quote:
Originally posted by occrider
Where are you getting this? The US supported the shah. Are you sayign that the US toppled Mohammed Mossadeq for nothing, brought into power teh ayotollah who subsequentely declared jihad against the United States, And supported Iraq in the Iran-Iraq war for shits and giggles??? Or is this all an elaborate scheme to conceal the fact that the US wanted to remove a pro-western/pro-US leader from power?


Mossadeq was toppled because he nationalized the Anglo-Iranian oil company. That's why the UK and the US declared sanctions on Iran and installed Pahlavi. When Pahlavi had second thoughts about extending British Petroleum license, the UK stopped buying oil from Iran, although the agreed minimum was 5m barrels/day. Not to mention that the shah was considering buying nuclear technology from France or Germany. Americans agreed with that policy, partly because of the special relations with UK, and partly because there was a probability that creating an islamic fundamentalist state could cause a spread of fundamentalism which would result in soviet muslim rebellion.


Posted by occrider on May-22-2004 14:58:

quote:
Originally posted by DrUg_Tit0
Mossadeq was toppled because he nationalized the Anglo-Iranian oil company. That's why the UK and the US declared sanctions on Iran and installed Pahlavi. When Pahlavi had second thoughts about extending British Petroleum license, the UK stopped buying oil from Iran, although the agreed minimum was 5m barrels/day. Not to mention that the shah was considering buying nuclear technology from France or Germany. Americans agreed with that policy, partly because of the special relations with UK, and partly because there was a probability that creating an islamic fundamentalist state could cause a spread of fundamentalism which would result in soviet muslim rebellion.


So the US toppled the Shah, and created a far greater mess of anti-western sentiments, through the UK who simply stopped buying oil from Iran? And how exactly did this increase Khomeini's ability to sieze power? SOurce?


Posted by DrUg_Tit0 on May-22-2004 18:01:

quote:
Originally posted by occrider
So the US toppled the Shah, and created a far greater mess of anti-western sentiments, through the UK who simply stopped buying oil from Iran? And how exactly did this increase Khomeini's ability to sieze power? SOurce?


Well, not quite like that. Actually, in this cas it's the british who are the ones responsible for toppling the Shah, while the US was mostly ambivalent towards the issue. Although Jimmy Carter did sort of condemn the shah for his violent oppression of the islamic opposition. The brits did have an exclusive contract at the time for extracting iranian oil. By boycotting it, they hoped to bring instability and to force the shah to renew their monopoly. I'm pretty sure nobody really wanted the islamic revolution to happen, but things don't always work out as planned. Hell, nobody wants to see Iraq turn into a fundamentalist muslim country, yet that's exactly what it's becomming. I'll search for sources later, kinda tired now.


Posted by trewqy on May-23-2004 04:43:

I just realised that Alexander the Great converted to Islam before he died.

Look.. to the one who made this topic, if Islam is really such a bad religion and all that, why is it the fastest growing religion in the world?


Posted by arctic on May-23-2004 05:12:

quote:
Originally posted by trewqy Look.. to the one who made this topic, if Islam is really such a bad religion and all that, why is it the fastest growing religion in the world?


Poor argument IMO. Firstly, it isn't the fastest growing religion in the world - that title probably belongs to neo-paganism, wicca and so forth, or possible the eastern faiths as they gain acceptance in the west (Buddhism is the fastest growing religion here, in four years it went from about 200,000 adherents to 350,000 adherents). The Baha'i World Faith also seems to be growing at a rather fast rate - so it probably deserves a mention too. Now, as for your assertion that because it's growing fast, it must be good - how does that make sense? For instance, Scientology is growing at a disturbingly fast rate (probably faster than Islam), but it's a vicious, dishonest cult that specializes in pseudo-science, blackmail and brain washing. You can't judge something's quality by looking at it's growth rate, you need to look at the actual religion and it's theology.

That being said, I don't necessarily think that Islam itself is a bad religion, but I do think that many Muslims are backward nutters who've got no grip on reality - but I believe that's due to the culture and environment in which the live, rather than the religion that they practice. If it was Christianity that was dominant in the middle east today, then the priests there would simply use verses from the old testament to justify murder and terrorism, goodness knows, there's enough of them.


Posted by TuanAnh213 on May-23-2004 06:02:

quote:
Originally posted by arctic

That being said, I don't necessarily think that Islam itself is a bad religion, but I do think that many Muslims are backward nutters who've got no grip on reality


i've always thought you were smarter than that to make blatant generalizations and assumptions...looks like you don't know many muslim or people of middle eastern descent


Posted by DrUg_Tit0 on May-23-2004 10:05:

quote:
Originally posted by arctic
For instance, Scientology is growing at a disturbingly fast rate (probably faster than Islam), but it's a vicious, dishonest cult that specializes in pseudo-science, blackmail and brain washing.


Well, it's a religion, isn't it? Whaddya expect?


Posted by arctic on May-23-2004 11:20:

quote:
Originally posted by DrUg_Tit0
Well, it's a religion, isn't it? Whaddya expect?


Haha - John Travolta was on a talk show down here recently where he happily informed the audience that people misunderstood Scientology because they haven't read about it - then told them to go out and read up on it if they're interested in how good it is. Somewhat ironic considering the fact that nearly all the publications and articles on it that aren't put out by the COS are actually heavily critical of it, and nearly always describe it as a criminal cult.

quote:
Originally posted by TuanAnh213
i've always thought you were smarter than that to make blatant generalizations and assumptions...looks like you don't know many muslim or people of middle eastern descent


Hold on there - I think that many humans are backward nutters who've got no grip on reality, irrespective of which particular religion they follow. Would you prefer it if I pretended that every Muslim was a 'nice intelligent person' when I really don't think that they are?

Now, that being said - I do think that when one looks at the middle east and the situation there, it's blatantly obvious that a lot of the people there have been brain washed. Where else do you see that level of religious fundamentalism? Thankfully Christianity seems to have grown out of it - although the current situation in the US gives me cause for concern. Once again, I don't think that this is necessarily the 'fault' of Islam, it's just happened due to the level of poverty, the lack of quality education and the socio economic situation in general.

Lastly, how did I make blatant generalizations. If you read my post, you'll note that I used the word many rather than all[ or most. If you're asserting that what I said was wrong, then fine - let's look at the evidence, without the old 'well you must not know anyone from the Middle East then!' stuff, okay?


Posted by Reverend_Trance on May-23-2004 13:59:

quote:
Originally posted by trewqy
I just realised that Alexander the Great converted to Islam before he died.


Alexander converted to a religion that was created 900 years after his death. Hmmmmmm.. Died in 323 BC, Islamic Calendar starts 622 AD.

quote:
Originally posted by trewqy
Look.. to the one who made this topic, if Islam is really such a bad religion and all that, why is it the fastest growing religion in the world?


IT IS I WHO CREATED THIS MESS.

Islam is a fast growing religion due to the practicality of service for salvation. (The Five Pillars of Islam) Also Islam is seen favorable due to its links with Judaism and Christianity. Another thing that makes it favorable is "conversion by the sword." Islam did not conquer to make an empire they conquered to make CONVERTS.

They "supposedly" follow the God of Judaism and Christianity. They claim decendence from Abraham and his first son Ishmeal.
As a student of theology, as a comparative religion the ties between Judaism and Christianity are more prevailant than Islam.
Muslims say that Mohammed was the last purifier of the Holy Scriptures.

The Old Testement (Jewish Pentatuch and Talmud) list the signs of the Messiah and Jesus fulfills all of the said predictions. In Judaism, the Messiah has not come yet. Jesus was the fulilment for the Christians, while Islam is still hanging on to its coat tails.


Posted by capricorn15 on May-23-2004 17:34:

quote:
Originally posted by hausmusic
Belonging to a religion has nothing to do with economic or political gain. Religion is a way of life for Islam and Christianity at least
only a few major concepts are part of religion.. be good be good to others. I mean if you want to go out and say islam is bad because most Muslims live in impoverished areas. Well im sure Jesus was rolling in an Rolls and blingin from head to toe.*(he wasnt he struggled a lot) Islam teaches you not to need material things. You have to look at a family that follows Islam in a country where cultural problems dont keep people down. Canada would be the best example. Culture and Religion are 2 different things and often mistaken. You would think in North America where people are supposedly more educated than say India or Pakistan, would be aware of that.
guess not

ooo, good post

i a lot of people are quick to point the finger and say it is bad based on how people are living and calling themselves "followers of wahtever religion" and they base their opinion on the religion from that. however, if someone wants to have a proper opinion, they should base it off reading the holy book, but people are too lazy i guess. i am not saying read books about the holy books, but the holy books themselves, so you dont get someone else's opinion


Posted by seawinde on Apr-25-2005 06:39:

quote:
Originally posted by arctic
Agreed. And since when was Islam a 'civilization'?


since ur ancient grandpa fucked ur grandma


Posted by occrider on Apr-25-2005 06:43:

quote:
Originally posted by seawinde
since ur ancient grandpa fucked ur grandma


Just like mormonism, scientology, buddhism, and devil worshipping are civilizations not to be confused with religions?


Posted by fastmp3 on Apr-25-2005 06:58:

so many hatred towards islam and muslim , it's a shame


Posted by ProDiGaL on Apr-25-2005 23:57:

quote:
Originally posted by arctic
it's blatantly obvious that a lot of the people there have been brain washed. Where else do you see that level of religious fundamentalism? Thankfully Christianity seems to have grown out of it

lolololollool


Posted by ShadoWolf on May-26-2005 05:35:

quote:
Originally posted by malek
wasn't the islamic-arabic empire the most developped scientifically, culturaly and economically for a long period of time?


taken from the Romans


Posted by ShadoWolf on May-26-2005 05:35:

http://service.spiegel.de/cache/int...,344374,00.html

The Death of a Muslim Woman

"The Whore Lived Like a German"

By Jody K. Biehl in Berlin

In the past four months, six Muslim women living in Berlin have been brutally murdered by family members. Their crime? Trying to break free and live Western lifestyles. Within their communities, the killers are revered as heroes for preserving their family dignity. How can such a horrific and shockingly archaic practice be flourishing in the heart of Europe? The deaths have sparked momentary outrage, but will they change the grim reality for Muslim women?

Hatin Surucu just wanted to live her own life. Instead, she became Berlin's latest victim of honor killings. Her Turkish Muslim brothers allegedly gunned her down for adopting Western ways.
The shots came from nowhere and within minutes the young Turkish mother standing at the Berlin bus stop was dead. A telephone call from a relative had brought her to this cold, unforgiving place. She thought she would only be gone for a few minutes and wore a light jacket in the freezing February wind. She had left her five-year-old son asleep in his bed. He awoke looking for his mother, who, like many Turkish women in Germany, harbored a secret life of fear, courage and, ultimately, grief. Now her little boy has his own tragedy to bear: His mother, Hatin Surucu, was not the victim of random violence, but likely died at the hands of her own family in what is known as an "honor killing."

Hatin's crime, it appears, was the desire to lead a normal life in her family's adopted land. The vivacious 23-year-old beauty, who was raised in Berlin, divorced the Turkish cousin she was forced to marry at age 16. She also discarded her Islamic head scarf, enrolled in a technical school where she was training to become an electrician and began dating German men. For her family, such behavior represented the ultimate shame -- the embrace of "corrupt" Western ways. Days after the crime, police arrested her three brothers, ages 25, 24 and 18. The youngest of the three allegedly bragged to his girlfriend about the Feb. 7 killing. At her funeral, Hakin's Turkish-Kurdish parents draped their only daughter's casket in verses from the Koran and buried her according to Muslim tradition. Absent of course, were the brothers, who were in jail.

The crime might be easier to digest if it had been an archaic anomaly, but five other Muslim women have been murdered in Berlin during the past four months by their husbands or partners for besmirching the family's Muslim honor. Two of them were stabbed to death in front of their young children, one was shot, one strangled and a fifth drowned. It seems hard to fathom, but in the middle of democratic Western Europe -- in Germany, a nation where pacifism is almost a universal mantra -- murderous macho patriotism not only exists but also appears to be thriving. It may even be Germany's liberalism -- and its post World War II fear of criticizing minority cultures -- that has encouraged ultra-religious families to settle here.

The problem is that much of this insular and ultra-religious world is out of public view, often hidden in inner-city apartments where the most influential links to the outside world are satellite dishes that receive Turkish and Arabic television and the local mosque. Tens of thousands of Turkish women live behind these walls of silence, in homes run by husbands many met on their wedding day and ruled by the ever-present verses of the Koran. In these families, loyalty and honor are elevated virtues and women are treated little better than slaves, unseen by society and often unnoticed or ignored by their German neighbors. To get what they want, these women have to run. They have to change their names, their passports, even their hair color and break with the families they often love, but simply can no longer obey.

Precise statistics on how many women die every year in such honor killings are hard to come by, as many crimes are never reported, said Myria Boehmecke of the Tuebingen-based women's group Terre des Femmes which, among other things, tries to protect Muslim girls and women from oppressive families. The Turkish women's organization Papatya has documented 40 instances of honor killings in Germany since 1996. Examples include a Darmstadt girl whose two brothers pummelled her to death with a hockey stick in April 2004 after they learned she had slept with her boyfriend. In Augsburg in April, a man stabbed his wife and 7-year-old daughter because the wife was having an affair. In December 2003, a Tuebingen father strangled his 16-year-old daughter and threw her body into a lake because she had a boyfriend. Bullets, knives, even axes and gasoline are the weapons of choice. The crime list compiled by Papatya is an exercise in horror. And the sad part, said Boehmecke, is that it is far from complete. "We'll never really know how many victims there are. Too often these crimes go unreported."

In many cases, fathers -- and sometimes even mothers -- single out their youngest son to do the killing, Boehmecke said, "because they know minors will get lighter sentences from German judges." In some cases, these boys are revered by their community and fellow inmates as "honor heroes" -- a dementedly skewed status they carry with them for the rest of their lives. Currently, six boys are serving time in Berlin's juvenile prison for honor killings. "In a way, these boys are victims, too," she said. Sometimes they are forced to kill their favorite sister.


One of the unsettling truths about Hatin's death and the plight of many Muslim women is that it took the comments of three Turkish boys and the outrage of a male school director to get people to notice. When the murder first happened, it sent no shock waves through the mainstream German press. It only became big news when a group of 14-year-old Turkish boys mocked Hatin during a class discussion at a school near the crime scene. One boy said, "She only had herself to blame," while another insisted, "She deserved what she got. The whore lived like a German." The enraged school director not only sent a letter home to parents, but also to teachers across Germany. The letter ignited a media fury. Less known, however, is that the letter also hit a nerve among educators. "Teachers from across the country wrote back saying they had had similar experiences," Boehmecke said. They reported Turkish boys taunting Turkish girls who don't wear headscarves as "German sluts." "That's the part no one has written about. Clearly there is huge potential for similar violence across Germany," Boehmecke said. "Not just in the big cities, but all over. It's a problem many politicians haven't been willing to face."

But that is not entirely true. Following the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and the revelation that several of the 9-11 plotters lived hidden lives in the up-scale German city of Hamburg, politicians and everyday Germans have more closely scrutinized the private lives of their friendly Turkish grocers, housecleaners, taxi drivers and even colleagues. At the same time, religious Muslims tightened their ranks, becoming more protective of each other in a world increasingly fearful of and hostile toward Islam.

German legislators, for their part, began rethinking the traditional delicacy with which the nation has handled its immigrants. For decades, German legislators lived under the shadow of the country's Third Reich past and the fear of appearing racist if it singled out a particular community or religion for scrutiny or special treatment.

"People were afraid they would be called Nazis if they dared to bring up issues of human rights in the Turkish community," said Serap Cileli, a Turkish author and filmmaker who at 15 was forced into an arranged marriage.

When Cileli fell in love with another Turkish man and threatened to break free, her mother came to Turkey, kidnapped her two children and took them to Germany. She then gave Cileli an ultimatum: give up the lover or never see the kids again. At first Cileli chose the kids and a life in Germany. But unlike many other stories, hers has a happy ending -- the lover later followed her to Germany and, after an enormous struggle with her family, the pair married and now live together with her children. She has written prodigiously about her experiences and now helps Turkish women escape oppressive families.

For the greater part of a decade, however, Cileli was unable to find a publisher for her work. "Everything I wrote from 1994 to 1999 was rejected, even by newspapers," she said. "They told me I was writing about a minority issue and they were afraid of appearing racist." That changed following Sept. 11, she said, when suddenly the hidden lives of Muslims became a hot topic and her writing and views are now widely published and even translated into her native Turkish.

Last year, a virtual tectonic shift occurred when Germany -- long considered a Mecca of religious tolerance by Muslims -- took its first step toward enforced secularism. Five of the nation's 16 states voted to ban teachers and other public officials from wearing headscarves to work. In October, after much lobbying, Turkish women's groups scored a coup when the government passed a law making it illegal for parents to force their children to marry. Turkey, a secular Muslim state, has long had such a law.

The November murder in neighboring Holland of filmmaker Theo van Gogh -- who was shot and stabbed to death by an Islamic extremist angry over his depiction of the violence inflicted on Muslim women in forced marriages -- galvanized the Netherlands and sent shock waves across Europe. As a result, Germans, too, began to take a second look at the 3.2 million immigrants -- 2.5 million of whom are Turkish -- living among them and to talk about the serious flaws of the nation's 1960's immigration policies. The program brought thousands of Turkish workers to Germany, but provided no real means of integrating the Muslim Turks or helping them understand Western concepts like individualism, human rights and equality. Now, Cileli said, perhaps, honor killings and other horrors experienced by Muslim women will finally be given the scrutiny they have long deserved.

Frightened for their lives

Muslim women often live insular lives focused on family and religion. How they live at home often clashes greatly with the society they are surrounded by.
The new laws are a vital step toward empowerment, said Cileli, but unfortunately, the corpses of disobedient women offer a more compelling reason for many young women to stay put. Plus, she said, laws don't take into account the psychological terror under which the women live. "These girls are frightened for their lives," she said. "If they do manage to get away, it would be an illusion to say the girls would run to the police." Besides, laws only cover civil marriages -- not religious ones. In many cases, families force their young daughters into Muslim weddings at very young ages (sometimes as early as 12 years old) and then only unite the couple civilly when the girls turn 18.

Though subtle, evidence of the seclusion in which religious Muslim women live in Germany abounds. Turkish tea rooms are often packed with men, while women are often at home caring for children. They rarely can be seen on the streets alone after dark. At a memorial vigil held a few weeks after Hatin's death, a mere 120 people showed up. Almost none were Turkish. In fact, most were from a lesbian and gay organization that -- outraged by the crime -- organized the make-shift ceremony.

The ceremony underscored another disturbing reality: It is often not the Muslim community that first expresses outrage over how its women live, but those on the outside. "It's often very frustrating for us that more doesn't come from within," Boehmecke said. "We've been trying to bring attention to the plight of women for years, but with little success." Cileli sees it in harsher terms. "It not only took the death of a white man" for people to prick up their ears, she said, but of a "white European" man (van Gogh). "A European was killed because he defended us -- and the world press stood up to listen. But how many women died before him?"

Astonishingly, the first extensive data the German government collected about the lives of Turkish women was published last summer, as part of a study done by the Ministry for Family Affairs. The study showed that 49 percent of Turkish women said they had experienced physical or sexual violence in their marriage. One fourth of those married to Turkish husbands said they met their grooms on their wedding day. Half said they were pressured to marry partners selected by relatives and 17 percent felt forced into such partnerships.

So far, the Turkish community has been sluggish in its response to such data and even to the question of honor killings. But last week -- about three weeks after Hatin's death and under heavy pressure from activists -- the Turkish Association of Berlin and Brandenburg held a round table discussion about the plight of Muslim women. At the talks, the group issued a 10-point plan calling for a "zero tolerance" stance on violence against women and encouraged other Turkish and Islamic organizations to "actively recognize" and address the problem.

Will it help? Because the group is secular, it will likely have little sway with deeply religious Turks. "The truth is, we can't reach those who aren't interested," the group's spokesman, Cumali Kangal, conceded.

The response among Germany's devout Muslims is equally tough to gauge as there is no single organization the community looks to for leadership. Instead, the community is divided into about three dozen groups, each with its own leadership. Ali Kizilkaya, the chairman of the Council of Islam, one of the largest umbrella organizations, has decried Hatin's murder as "an abuse and affront to the Muslim religion." He insists Islam does not condone honor killings.

But try telling that, said Boehmecke, to the hoards of young boys who taunt Turkish girls in schools and their families who tacitly encourage such behavior. Educators at the grassroots say their numbers are rising, she says. Indeed, the German weekly Die Zeit reports that the percent of schoolgirls wearing headscarves in the Berlin district where Hatin was killed has gone from virtually none to about 40 percent in the past three years. Which one of today's smiling schoolgirls, Boehmecke wonders, will be next year's victim of honor?




R.I.P.


Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.