TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- Expensive 19" Mixers
Pages (2): « 1 [2]
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Vero the 600 has the sampler that the 500 and 3000 do not. i have spun on all 3 pioneer mixers and the sound quality seems the same to me: decent, but far from great. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by BeatSMiTH Are you saying the 500 and the 600 sound the same? Because 600 sounds WAYYY better than a 500 does. I was just wondering how a 500 sounds compared to a 3000, and if the 3000 sounds the same as a 600. |
ahah thats right. You can put together all the pioneer mixers and they still can't even touch it! I can't thank you enough!
| quote: |
| Originally posted by BeatSMiTH Are you saying the 500 and the 600 sound the same? Because 600 sounds WAYYY better than a 500 does. I was just wondering how a 500 sounds compared to a 3000, and if the 3000 sounds the same as a 600. |
The 3000 is identical to the 600 in ALL ways except that its a 19", doesnt have a sampler, but instead carries the industry-first 'beat-effekts'. The reason why the 3000 is cheaper (and this is comes from pioneer themselves) is because not as much money had to go into researching. Also its important to remember that this price applies to just North-America. In the rest of the wrold, the djm-3000 is around 100USD more expensive than the 600. If you go to djsounds.com you can also see that pioneer refers the djm-600 as the 'little sister' to the djm-3000..not the other way around. And as for sound quality..it is equally good to the djm-600 and faaaar superior to the djm-500. And trust me on this..I was raised by an audiophile dad who trained my ear ever since I was 6.
Peace, Dj Dissent
where'd you get the 3000 being more expensive in the rest of the world. Pio's RRP's here are AUS$2499 for the 600 and AUS$1899 for the 3000, not that anyone would pay those prices, but they show the relative price pretty well.
There are more differences, extra mike inputs, more fader starts
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Dj Dissent The 3000 is identical to the 600 in ALL ways except that its a 19", doesnt have a sampler, but instead carries the industry-first 'beat-effekts'. The reason why the 3000 is cheaper (and this is comes from pioneer themselves) is because not as much money had to go into researching. Also its important to remember that this price applies to just North-America. In the rest of the wrold, the djm-3000 is around 100USD more expensive than the 600. If you go to djsounds.com you can also see that pioneer refers the djm-600 as the 'little sister' to the djm-3000..not the other way around. And as for sound quality..it is equally good to the djm-600 and faaaar superior to the djm-500. And trust me on this..I was raised by an audiophile dad who trained my ear ever since I was 6. Peace, Dj Dissent |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by tubby where'd you get the 3000 being more expensive in the rest of the world. Pio's RRP's here are AUS$2499 for the 600 and AUS$1899 for the 3000, not that anyone would pay those prices, but they show the relative price pretty well. There are more differences, extra mike inputs, more fader starts |
OK, so I'm def gonna get the 3000. The thing im most concerned about is the sound quality. with my POS behringer, the sound quality is lacking. How do you compare the sound quality of the 3000 with that of the DJX700?
You really cant, Behringer just straight out sucks and Pioneer sucks alot less. 
Right now, I have a Xone:62... If I ever get another mixer, I would get maybe a Urei 1620 or Dateq Styx. 
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.