Lo Step - Burma (Sasha's Remix) - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Lo Step - Burma (Sasha's Remix)
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

Posted by Tranc3 on Jul-15-2004 21:19:

Re: Lo Step - Burma (Sasha's Remix)

quote:
Originally posted by llliiillliiilll
what a remix this is. truly mindblowing stuff. i love this kind of music.

What's up with your name?

Track is boring btw.

Posted by Torley Wong on Jul-15-2004 21:23:

onomatopoeia ?

Posted by TeKnoHe@d2025 on Jul-16-2004 00:29:

quote:
Originally posted by Scottaculous
That's interesting. I didn't know that. Do you know the name of the song?

"The Day of Night" by Akira Yamaoka off of the Silent Hill 2 OST. I have it if you're interested.

Posted by starglider on Jul-16-2004 00:40:

Re: Re: Lo Step - Burma (Sasha's Remix)

quote:
Originally posted by Tranc3
What's up with your name?

Track is boring btw.

Reminds me of Winamp's equaliser bands.

Posted by twisted on Jul-16-2004 03:40:

insane fucking song though

Posted by llliiillliiilll on Jul-16-2004 04:05:

Re: Re: Re: Lo Step - Burma (Sasha's Remix)

quote:
Originally posted by starglider
Reminds me of Winamp's equaliser bands.

heheh thats what i wanted to represent i made this name to

Posted by dj_lane on Jul-16-2004 07:21:

i dont prefer the track much at all, like tranc3 said, its boring, but! i do like when it gets quiet and it does the little eh eh...duuuu.hyhyh.h.h..hu.hu..h .... or w/e however you do it, its that cool part when the vocals get cut off and on, i think thats cool, it deserves a deep, trancy remix

Posted by mike_stefan69 on Jul-16-2004 08:01:

it seems like the TiTs & n00bs dont like it

i wonder why...

Posted by Tranc3 on Jul-16-2004 08:38:

quote:
Originally posted by mike_stefan69
it seems like the TiTs & n00bs dont like it

i wonder why...

Maybe because it's boring?

Posted by mike_stefan69 on Jul-16-2004 09:45:

quote:
Originally posted by Tranc3
Maybe because it's boring?

i dont understand how someone who lists james holden as one of their favourite producers can call this boring

Posted by noikeee on Jul-16-2004 10:33:

it's just a question of taste.. i don't find it boring at all, especially pitched up around 4%+

Posted by Tranc3 on Jul-16-2004 18:28:

quote:
Originally posted by mike_stefan69
i dont understand how someone who lists james holden as one of their favourite producers can call this boring

Because Holden uses far more attention to detail.

Posted by umes23 on Jul-16-2004 19:16:

quote:
Originally posted by Tranc3
Maybe because it's boring?

you've gotta be fuckin kidding me -- i don't know how you could possibly find Burma boring. this track is more alive than so many pounding trancers people listen to. i have been hooked on this ever since i first heard it. sasha's bassline is so fucking good and its great on the dancefloor. this is my favorite track of the cd, and this cd makes me smile and jump around - not necessarily because of the moods of the tracks but because it's a refreshingly fucking good cd that blows anything of this year to bits. bass grooves, beats and chill melodies, it's perfect if you ask me.

i'm sorry, i don't blame people for their tastes.. but fuck that, lostep - burma is hot stuff and thats all i have to say about that.

and by the way, get a clue if you think sasha is not attentive to detail. he has a million and one sounds that blend together in perfect harmony in his latest productions. you do not arrive at this by fucking luck. compare some of these tracks with their originals and listen to airdrawndagger properly, you might learn a thing or two about PAYING ATTENTION TO DETAIL from sasha

Posted by Floorfiller on Jul-16-2004 19:26:

i really like the track...i think its solid.

Posted by Tranc3 on Jul-16-2004 19:54:

quote:
Originally posted by umes23
you've gotta be fuckin kidding me -- i don't know how you could possibly find Burma boring. this track is more alive than so many pounding trancers people listen to. i have been hooked on this ever since i first heard it. sasha's bassline is so fucking good and its great on the dancefloor. this is my favorite track of the cd, and this cd makes me smile and jump around - not necessarily because of the moods of the tracks but because it's a refreshingly fucking good cd that blows anything of this year to bits. bass grooves, beats and chill melodies, it's perfect if you ask me.

i'm sorry, i don't blame people for their tastes.. but fuck that, lostep - burma is hot stuff and thats all i have to say about that.

and by the way, get a clue if you think sasha is not attentive to detail. he has a million and one sounds that blend together in perfect harmony in his latest productions. you do not arrive at this by fucking luck. compare some of these tracks with their originals and listen to airdrawndagger properly, you might learn a thing or two about PAYING ATTENTION TO DETAIL from sasha

Show me where I said Sasha is not attentive to detail. Show me where I never listened to Airdrawndagger "properly." Lastly, show me what it is that I said about a piece of music that made you take such offense to my opinion - one that wasn't even directed towards you at that.

Posted by Kurve on Jul-17-2004 00:16:

Personaly i find the original far better then the Sasha mix but sasha did a good job.... but when it comes to Luke Chable and Phil K they put out some of the nicest progressive breaks out and the original mix of this track is by far the best breaks track of the year pure bliss.

Posted by mike_stefan69 on Jul-17-2004 07:53:

to be fair airdrawndagger did feature a lot of input from James Holden, Charlie May & Junkie XL

Trance3 - I agree that James Holden is an excellent producer - I never questioned his production skills. I just fail to see how any of his tracks are more "exciting" than this. Apart from A Break In The Clouds (which is an amazing piece of work in every single way) I just rate his productions.

Posted by Tranc3 on Jul-17-2004 10:12:

quote:
Originally posted by mike_stefan69
I just fail to see how any of his tracks are more "exciting" than this.

That's my point exactly. It's been my opinion all along, and I still feel that Burma is a boring track. I don't get why people feel the need to tell me my opinion is somehow incorrect - after all, how can a subjective topic ever be judged objectively?

Posted by twisted on Jul-17-2004 10:14:

quote:
Originally posted by Tranc3
don't get why people feel the need to tell me my opinion is somehow incorrect - after all, how can a subjective topic ever be judged objectively?

Very True, Tranc3 wins

Posted by umes23 on Jul-19-2004 07:08:

quote:
Originally posted by Tranc3
That's my point exactly. It's been my opinion all along, and I still feel that Burma is a boring track. I don't get why people feel the need to tell me my opinion is somehow incorrect - after all, how can a subjective topic ever be judged objectively?

well i guess i just feel very strongly about this track, and found it to be quite opposite of boring. but that was me and you are you so yeah, i'll agree my post was not necessary. i just like it that much.

Posted by Subey on Dec-30-2004 17:49:

Finally got around to picking up Involver today. What's with the funny cd case size? Am I supposed to use these pics as postcards!

Anyway Burma is a stellar track. Love the synths at the end... puts me in a pure trance state

Posted by Petrogad on Dec-30-2004 18:14:

i Love to drop this track at the end of a set, its just so damn beautiful i love it, amazing synths just crazy how simple the pattern is...

Posted by Ory on Dec-30-2004 18:14:

eeeee, old thread.

Anyway, it's a good track, but definitely not the best on Involver.

Posted by stren on Dec-30-2004 21:35:

quote:
Originally posted by Ory
eeeee, old thread.

Anyway, it's a good track, but definitely not the best on Involver.

+1

Shpongle - Dorset Perception my fav

Posted by Inertia on Dec-31-2004 01:10:

i can criticize that Sasha simplified the breakbeat pattern, as opposed to the original, and uses less percussion, making it a bit more mellow. the breakdown with the amazing melody wins me over though, something which the original overlooks (it never plays the melody by itself, making it harder to appreciate). i like them both. needs some mashuing up... hmmm...

Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »