lange sincere for you feat kirsty hawkshaw

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Album Reviews / New Releases Discussion
-- lange sincere for you feat kirsty hawkshaw
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

Posted by lilslim79 on Jul-23-2004 19:15:

thats cause its not released yet check the new/upcoming release dates in the forum and it has it coming out soon on 12"
lange feat kirsty hawkshaw - sincere for you incl thrillseekers remix

Posted by DeviantxPete on Jul-23-2004 21:15:

Re: MONEY STILL WANTS VINYL!

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Hoyt
Yes that's great, but where can I find this!

Patience. It'll be out soon enough. Besides, Firewall's Sincere is better without the vocals.

Posted by lilslim79 on Jul-23-2004 22:13:

yes it is, espescially the Pulser Remix, i think this is one of the greatest instrumentals of all time...up there with Cafe Del Mar (Marco V Remix)

Posted by KrissO on Jul-24-2004 18:36:

A 2:45 minute long 64k sample up of the Original Mix of Sincere For You here

Posted by qwikk on Jul-24-2004 18:59:

people still don't seem to be reading that Sincere and Sincere for You are two different songs except for the vocals...

Posted by KrissO on Jul-24-2004 19:01:

Yeah and it's irritating

Posted by mimi kasal on Jul-29-2004 15:22:

lange sincere for you feat kirsty hawkshaw

Had to say heard this again and it blew me away this track should be getting airplay its mad ................

Posted by john2 on Jul-29-2004 19:26:

Really nice tune,the vocals are great.At last a good vocal trance tune as there aren't many this year

Posted by DjSimonB on Jul-29-2004 22:37:

I heard that track last night, played by Matt Darey and to be honest, I thought it was shite. Cheesy vocals, average tune, I don't understand the fuss.

Not heard the Thrillseekers mix yet though, is there a Thrillseekers dub? That could be good...

Posted by refuge on Jul-29-2004 22:38:

The vocals in this track are quite bland. Very unimpressive.

// ref

Posted by KrissO on Jul-29-2004 22:40:

quote:
Originally posted by Mattsanity
Wow, Sincere For You (Thrillseekers Remix) has is a totally different tune compared to the original Sincere For You but both have the same lyrics.

Can't you just read!?!?!?

Posted by DjSimonB on Jul-29-2004 23:38:

quote:
Originally posted by refuge.01^
The vocals in this track are quite bland. Very unimpressive.

// ref

Finally someone agrees with me, your avatar tells me all I need to know about your good taste in music

Posted by DJ Hoyt on Jul-29-2004 23:56:

Vocals + Trance = natural

quote:
Originally posted by DjSimonB
Finally someone agrees with me, your avatar tells me all I need to know about your good taste in music

I'm sorry, but I find the vocals are strong and really carry the track. I never knew that the usual vocalist for Tiesto did this track. No wonder it's so good =) A girl's beautiful voice and the soaring synths of trance really match well together.

Now only if the Pulser Remix had a vocal version....

Posted by refuge on Jul-30-2004 04:23:

Re: Vocals + Trance = natural

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Hoyt
I'm sorry, but I find the vocals are strong and really carry the track. I never knew that the usual vocalist for Tiesto did this track. No wonder it's so good =) A girl's beautiful voice and the soaring synths of trance really match well together.

Now only if the Pulser Remix had a vocal version....

Oh dear God, no. The Pulser remix is the only version that has any credibility.

Posted by KrissO on Jul-30-2004 10:10:

Re: Re: Vocals + Trance = natural

quote:
Originally posted by refuge.01^
Oh dear God, no. The Pulser remix is the only version that has any credibility.

That's a load of bullshit. The Pulser remix is awesome yes, but you can't say the original isn't creditworthy. Just listen to how it builds and builds, pure class if you ask me. And secondly it had a lot of remix potential for Pulser.

Posted by Phortastic on Aug-10-2004 12:51:

The Thrillseekers mix is massive.
Original is bit cheesy for me

Posted by MagikMan_643 on Aug-10-2004 16:51:

Personally I prefer The Thrillseekers remix of this track, a very nice track indeed imo

Posted by varun on Aug-10-2004 18:50:

Both mixes are equally uplifing. A solid vocal track and both mixes should drop beautifully on the dancefloor.

Posted by eternity4ever on Aug-10-2004 19:35:

lovin both

Posted by trance-ecj on Aug-18-2004 23:29:

quote:
Originally posted by Mattsanity
Original Mix: 10/10
Thrillseekers Remix: 8/10

The Original Mix is better simply because of the lead melody compared to the Thrillsekers', which sounds pretty average.

I agree...Original is massive!

However, I may have to give it a little tiny re-work because the cut right before the big line hits was a HORRIBLE HORRIBLE HORRIBLE decision. It should have kept building with maybe a drum roll or something...anything...that cut was just awful!!! It's got such a massive build and then all of the sudden it stops....I can just see people goin "what the hell just happened...oh wait, there it is!"

anyways, still a great tune

Posted by qwikk on Aug-18-2004 23:44:

for the retards talking about the Pulser remix... that's SINCERE not SINCERE FOR YOU. Sincere \= Sincere for You. thank you and have another dumb day.

Posted by varun on Aug-19-2004 10:57:

quote:
Originally posted by qwikk
for the retards talking about the Pulser remix... that's SINCERE not SINCERE FOR YOU. Sincere \= Sincere for You. thank you and have another dumb day.

52 replies later and still some idiots don't get it...

Posted by KrissO on Aug-19-2004 12:26:

quote:
Originally posted by varun
52 replies later and still some idiots don't get it...

If they would just bother to read

Posted by Phortastic on Aug-19-2004 12:42:

Posted by euphoria on Aug-19-2004 13:50:

Eh the track is ok. A lil on the mellow side for me. Need more energy.

Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »