1210 MK5G vs. TTX1 ?? - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- 1210 MK5G vs. TTX1 ??
Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Posted by Vero on Dec-04-2004 05:45:

i vote techs

Posted by discjockey82 on Dec-05-2004 08:51:

Technics are built like f'ing tanks. They will last forever (unless you treat them like shit) I bought the SL-1200MK5's a while ago and am loving them. The bar I play at has some 1200MK2's that have been a bit abused, but still work great. The Numark's are nice, my first set was Numark, but Technics is #1 for a reason.

Posted by cheesy on Dec-05-2004 20:12:

I like the TTX1s fine.

Posted by Wraith on Dec-06-2004 05:27:

quote:
Originally posted by dj darroch
& the fact that you can do see the bpm...

WTF do you need to do that for?

Posted by don_q on Dec-06-2004 16:52:

quote:
Originally posted by Cheetah86 The pitch delay he's describing would affect the speed that the platter turns at

Well if you see/notice the delay in the platter... well, as you said I don't notice it either. I was thinking, if he heard the delay, then the output format would matter.

And dj darroch, TTX's BPM reader sucks very badly.
For me the only use of the display is to know which pitch range I'm using, which I hardly change anyway.

Posted by dj darroch on Dec-06-2004 17:51:

Thanks for the replies, i know i dont really need a bpm lcd screen because that would jus make it harder for me to beatmatch as i've heard its not all that accuarate.

Your opnions & other peoples revies on the mk5g have left me swaying towards buying them with xmas & some other money lying about.

At first i thought, i would like to have more torque just to start,que records easier but that doesnt really matter. I'm quite surprised also to read that my tt200's have more toque than mk5gs! I fot they had less but obv not.

I got to admit the mk5g do look much sexier & sleeker than the ttx1's

Pages (2): « 1 [2]