TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Missile defence shield test fails AGAIN!!
Pages (5): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 »


Posted by Kytracid on Dec-16-2004 18:38:

quote:
Originally posted by rabbitjoker
North Korea isn't the problem.

China is.


China's only a problem because it's a super power, which won't be bullied around by the US like say North Korea / Iran / Iraq / The rest of the world...

A realistic missle attack on the US in my opinion would probably come from some renagade state in the middle east or former USSR, not North Korea or China. Then again, this whole missle defence is a sham to hand out multi billion dollar contracts to defence contractors. The tests, like the plan itself is severely flawed, and wouldn't work if there ever was an attack.

Just another great way to spend tax payer dollars and keep the corporate juggernaut that is the US, ploughing ahead.


Posted by drgoodvibe on Dec-16-2004 18:41:

Conventional warefare using missles by countries like Iran are unlikely. Iran is no where near a match to the U.S or NK or China's military might, and they're aware of that.

What would be more likely would be a nuclear weapon smuggled into a nation and exploded from inside. The country that sponsored it will deny that they did, which opens a pandora's box of finger pointing. They can say it was a renegade terrorist group. Would the international community allow an entire country to be whiped out if it was just one group, say Hezbollah or Hamas? Hard questions really.


Posted by dEsidEL on Dec-16-2004 18:41:

quote:
Originally posted by ShadoWolf
If they're sane, then yes.

However, homicidal maniacs like jihadis won't care. After all, they're going to get 70 virgins in heaven for their deeds.




let's hug them and give them a reason not to attack


Posted by dEsidEL on Dec-16-2004 18:44:

quote:
Originally posted by drgoodvibe
Conventional warefare using missles by countries like Iran are unlikely. Iran is no where near a match to the U.S or NK or China's military might, and they're aware of that.

What would be more likely would be a nuclear weapon smuggled into a nation and exploded from inside. The country that sponsored it will deny that they did, which opens a pandora's box of finger pointing. They can say it was a renegade terrorist group. Would the international community allow an entire country to be whiped out if it was just one group, say Hezbollah or Hamas? Hard questions really.




you forgot to account for the renegade Jihad groups that Shadowolf pointed out who intend to commandeer nuclear silo control facilities in rogue nations to launch ICBMs at targets in the US and among its allies and who care nothing for M.A.D. because 7 virgins await them in heaven !!


Posted by hardcore trancer on Dec-16-2004 18:49:

quote:
Originally posted by ShadoWolf
If they're sane, then yes.

However, homicidal maniacs like jihadis won't care. After all, they're going to get 70 virgins in heaven for their deeds.



stupid redneck How about that redneck maniac Bush and his insanity toward the world? I guess what he does is normal and fine right?
perhaps you should move down the border so you'll be protected against terrorism under that fuckin missle defence systm


Posted by ShadoWolf on Dec-16-2004 18:59:

quote:
Originally posted by hardcore trancer
stupid redneck How about that redneck maniac Bush and his insanity toward the world? I guess what he does is normal and fine right?
perhaps you should move down the border so you'll be protected against terrorism under that fuckin missle defence systm



If the 9/11 hijackers could have killed millions of people, they would have. Jihadis are crazy.


oh, and you a


Posted by Special K on Dec-16-2004 19:09:

quote:
Originally posted by ShadoWolf
If they're sane, then yes.

However, homicidal maniacs like jihadis won't care. After all, they're going to get 70 virgins in heaven for their deeds.


true.

quote:
Originally posted by ShadoWolf
If the 9/11 hijackers could have killed millions of people, they would have. Jihadis are crazy.


again very true. if they had the means to do so those moron fundamentalist/jihadi crackpots would love to kill/destroy us all.


Posted by hardcore trancer on Dec-16-2004 19:56:

quote:
Originally posted by ShadoWolf
If the 9/11 hijackers could have killed millions of people, they would have. Jihadis are crazy.


oh, and you a




Enjoy living your life in fear


Posted by hardcore trancer on Dec-16-2004 19:59:

quote:
Originally posted by Special K

again very true. if they had the means to do so those moron fundamentalist/jihadi crackpots would love to kill/destroy us all.



Ya run they are coming after you


Posted by exraver on Dec-16-2004 21:15:

Russia already tested missiles which can manouver during flight,
making $80 billion shield obsolete.....
Stupid americans


Posted by hardcore trancer on Dec-16-2004 21:20:

quote:
Originally posted by exraver
Stupid americans



werd


Posted by Fir3start3r on Dec-17-2004 06:33:

quote:
Originally posted by hardcore trancer
Ya run they are coming after you


They have been, where the hell you been???


Posted by dEsidEL on Dec-17-2004 06:57:



peace people.. PEACE !!







Posted by hardcore trancer on Dec-17-2004 07:02:

quote:
Originally posted by Fir3start3r
They have been, where the hell you been???


Ya I forgot they are just waiting to blow us up right here in Toronto!!
Perhaps it is safer if you'd move down the border so you'll be protected under the so called missle defence shield system!!


Posted by hardcore trancer on Feb-15-2005 09:10:

Red face

The missle defence test FAILSagain

link here



aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahhahahA fuckin Americans and their useless technology.


But hey lets join them even though the system hardly works after all those terrorists are still after us


Posted by Pett on Feb-15-2005 09:36:

the system is almost operational if you take the 5 outa 8 stat.

38% failure rate rate.....

send 2 missles at target missle 19% failure rate
send 40 defence missles .......well u get the idea.


Posted by hardcore trancer on Feb-15-2005 10:10:

quote:
Originally posted by Pettiscool
the system is almost operational if you take the 5 outa 8 stat.

38% failure rate rate.....

send 2 missles at target missle 19% failure rate
send 40 defence missles .......well u get the idea.



The question here is that do we need to be part of somehing useless like this?cant we spent all this money on somehting more useful?healthcare?education? or should we spend the millions of dollars on this junk so that "IF" one day the so called terrorists decided to attack us we could be safe?

Do we have to be part of the this whole fear game that the U.S. government is shoving in our throats day by day?


Posted by b4k-oz on Feb-15-2005 16:47:

OK let us not forget the obvious....their is no right answer and no one solution...right now

No sense in working yourself up when your just going in circles now.

Focus your nrg on living a valid and worthwhile existance...until the powers that be can realize or hear our cries that NO ONE WINS IN A WAR!


Posted by starsearcher on Feb-15-2005 16:54:

The russians have already developed a new ICBM that will be able to penetrate the missle defense shield even if it does get to work...it's a never ending arms race.

The missle defense shield isn't built agains terrorists by the way (Arab terrorists that you OBVIOUSLY refer to) but against countries like North Korea for ex.

By the way...if a nuclear mislle does fall in New York (for example)...you'll be fucked by all the radiation so I don't understand why are you SO happy about it?


Posted by ShadoWolf on Feb-15-2005 17:22:

Re: Missile defence shield test fails AGAIN!!

quote:
Originally posted by hardcore trancer
Iam glad the test failed and I hope it will fail again and again.


That's because you want Iranian missles to rain down on Washington.


Posted by ShadoWolf on Feb-15-2005 17:32:

quote:
Originally posted by hardcore trancer
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahhahahA fuckin Americans and their useless technology.


American:


etc.



Canadian:

etc.


This country hasn't done a damn thing since insulin.


Posted by RobbyG. on Feb-15-2005 17:42:

quote:
Originally posted by ShadoWolf

This country hasn't done a damn thing since insulin.



Yes we have...the Avro Arrow


Posted by RobbyG. on Feb-15-2005 17:44:

As for the Missile Defence Shield...I'm on the fence on this one.But its scary now that North Korea has nukes that can possibly reach the west coast


Posted by swilly on Feb-15-2005 17:45:

quote:
Originally posted by Fir3start3r
...Canada will participate in missile defence program as long as they don't have to pay, don't have to put missiles on Canadian soil, and get a say in how it runs...
>> Source<<

What else do you want???
We get our cake AND eat it too...

You know it's really fuckin' embarrassing when we can't even defend our own country that another country feels that have to defend us too just to defend themselves.
And don't give me some, 'well they did it to themselves crap'.
"They" came over here from that other part of the world, remember??
The world is a lot smaller these days...


Back in the 1950s we had developed high speed fighter planes to protect our country ( ie the Avro arrow) and we scapped it because of the Yanks.
This is not so much about common continental security but rather deferring some of the costs.

Fuck the missle shield. The Bomark missles in the 1950s failed anyways so whats the diff.

I would rather see billions of dollars be used for fancy wall paper in the queens private sex room then be used in this project.


Posted by ShadoWolf on Feb-15-2005 17:49:

quote:
Originally posted by RobbyG.
Yes we have...the Avro Arrow





pwned!!


Pages (5): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.