TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- Zabiela on a budget
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Nemesis44 Zabiela's style - This style is more discreet. 'Let's see if they notice this' sort of thing. Keep in mind that it still has to sound good. You still have to believe that the song was meant to be that way or think 'Wow, is this a new remix'. Refreshing and different from the usual DJ's and great entertainment. Again more of a DJ's DJ as most people (Average clubber) don't actually know what JZ is famous for, they will just think he is the same as Tiesto etc. |
when you say scratching (i've never used a efx500) you mean fooling around with the efx500 unit and moving the jog wheel back and fourth - but thats not scratching!
Brilliant post there Nem. You summed it up perfectly.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Luke Terry if i remember correctly... its a djm500 in the video, not a 600 ![]() |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ken_Allen +1 See...i'm not saying Zabiela has no talent for what he does, I am basically saying you people shouldn't be calling it scratching...more like 'efxing' when you say scratching (i've never used a efx500) you mean fooling around with the efx500 unit and moving the jog wheel back and fourth - but thats not scratching! |
its all gone a bit off topic.
However my intention was never to actually copy his style, allough i like his imaginative mixing,
like dj chex says, just mixing isnt enough.
I listen back to my sets, and think how bland they sound compared to Zabiela's sets(especially alive) and its not just zabiela, I used to like Halliwell's Bosh Cd's when i really loved trance, i just though his mixing added energy.
Thats what I want to achieve, I want the parts where I am activley mixing to be the parts people want to listen too. I want to include some imagination.
Just out of interest, can any one else comment on the behringer VMX 300's ability to accomodate an EFX500? (i listed why it may not be up to the part in the opening post)
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Nemesis44 Interesting debate... And here is my two euros worth Cheers Nem |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by CraSHer[UK] Just out of interest, can any one else comment on the behringer VMX 300's ability to accomodate an EFX500? (i listed why it may not be up to the part in the opening post) |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by beats and beeps A mixer, regular turntables, and an efx is all you need. locked grooves. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by First Strike Most of Zabielas tricks/scrathches need a cd deck you cant do that sort of stuff with "regular turntables" |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by First Strike Most of Zabielas tricks/scrathches need a cd deck you cant do that sort of stuff with "regular turntables" |
im gonna defend JZ here too... comparing him to a turntabilist would be foolish because although he scratches and is good at it, thats not what makes him a good DJ. anybody remember this?
| quote: |
| 'He made me feel sick' was the veteran tech house DJs� verdict on the young upstart he had played with in Europe the week before. It was something to do with the way he attacked the CDJ1000s, scratching into his opening tune, synching up two copies of another, nudging one slightly out of phase for a big flangey effect before slamming the reverse switch on one of the decks for a rhythmically perfect splurge of aural mayhem. It was another good night out down the disco with James Zabiela. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ken_Allen +1 See...i'm not saying Zabiela has no talent for what he does, I am basically saying you people shouldn't be calling it scratching...more like 'efxing' when you say scratching (i've never used a efx500) you mean fooling around with the efx500 unit and moving the jog wheel back and fourth - but thats not scratching! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by First Strike Most of Zabielas tricks/scrathches need a cd deck you cant do that sort of stuff with "regular turntables" |
I cant beleive that everyone thinks you need a cdj to loop a scratch sample.
There are various records that have the "ahhh" sample in a locked groove. This is the same as a loop, and as long as you have a good cart it should skip anyways.
Ahh hell, if they don't want to believe in locked grooves or skipless battle wax then let them buy a CDJ1000 for the skipless loop function.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by beats and beeps My pcv275 has effects send/recieve, but apparently it doesnt work very well on that model, so I'm worried that getting an efx wont be worth it, because I really have minimal use for it if I can't assign it to individual channels nicely. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by beats and beeps I cant beleive that everyone thinks you need a cdj to loop a scratch sample. There are various records that have the "ahhh" sample in a locked groove. This is the same as a loop, and as long as you have a good cart it should skip anyways. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by First Strike also quickley playing the sample in reverse and then foward on a normal turntable cant be done.... |
I just wanna say that what JZ is doing isn't completely new to the scene, I've seen local DJs do close to what hes doing now years ago, its just only now its been noticed, I ain't knocking the guy, hes got mad skills and has taken the scene in a direction it has needed to go for some time, I hope to see more skilled DJs of similar style appear as going from track to track is good, but its just not that personal, people need to add there own style to there sets.
I hear you guys talking a lot about records with locked grooves and it's true they do exist.
What's worth keeping in mind though is that with these records you are strictly limited to the sounds that the makers of the record felt like giving you.
With a CDJ you are free to choose your own sounds to lock into a groove.
Let's also be real about this.
You don't need a locked groove or a loop to scratch. That is just preposterous.
What it does do however is the oportunity to add a maniplulated effect to what you are already doing or alternatively adjust something to get a wilder effect.
Bottom line is that it frees you up to do more.
Zabiela can scratch the normal way to as can a fair few of us. But people seem to be missing the point in this massive thread hijack.
The EFX-500 and a CDJ is a means to have fun and be creative with the music.
If for some reason you were to think that you could perform all the turntablist tricks with a any CD deck then you are seriously mistaken.
Stop making this ridiculous comparison between CDJs and regular decks. They are not the same animal and don't offer the same creative options.
The basic tricks offered on CDJS have much easier access and in a sense are more dance music friendly.
Turntables require massive skill and these tricks were not created with dance music in the first place anyway.
To be good with any of these toys requires dedication and creativity so like anything in life you have to pay your dues.
Like DannyO said, Zabiela isn't the first to be doing this and neither was Halliwell. But both have skills plus their face fitted in the right place and right time.
They are world famous and we are not and that's all there is to it.
For the rest of us mortals, it's our job to take on board what they are doing and take it to the next level.
Cheers
Nem
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Inertia with the EFX, DJM600, a locked groove with a sample, you could basically do almost every single thing he does, on vinyl. |
I'm very sorry to inform you but I have battle records with skipless scratch phrases containing same the scratch sample Zabiela was using in the video. I don't see why I couldn't use that record send the channel to an EFX-500 and trans it like Zabiela did. It won't skip either if I do backspins because the sample is skipless. I can backspin then push it forward as hard as I want and it doesn't skip. (actually it does skip but it falls back into the adjacent groove which contains the exact same sample). Its also possible to make a locked groove on ANY record you own, you just need a little piece of tape. Oh yeah and people have been doing the same stuff with vinyl for a long time now. Except for the stuff you need a CDJ1000 for. It does however take more skill if you're using vinyl as you don't get certain features that are on the CDJ1000.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Zild It does however take more skill if you're using vinyl as you don't get certain features that are on the CDJ1000. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by First Strike I dont think so, If it was possible there would be others doing it with vinyl, im not saying a similar sound cant be acheived but there is something very destinctive about his scratching/effects sounds that can only be done on cdj's |
The main reason everybody is pointing out the locked groove vinyl is cuz you get people posting that they want to do what Zabiela does, but don't have the money to invest in CDJ's. What you need to do the basics is a locked groove vinyl, mixer w/ send & receives, and an efx box. The more $$ you invest in equipment, the less you are limited to.
People keep pointing out that you need a DJM-600 also. Why would you need that, just cuz Zabiela uses it, you now need it? Any mixer w/ send/receives will let you do it, some just better than others.
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.