U2 vs. Oasis - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Europe - United Kingdom & Ireland
-- U2 vs. Oasis
Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Posted by AndskiSpeed on Feb-06-2005 22:43:

quote:
Originally posted by Coup
one is a masterpiece.

How is it a masterpiece?

Posted by kr00t0n on Feb-06-2005 22:51:

U2 by a mile, its the Oasis tracks that all sound the same to me.

Compare Hold Me, Thrill Me, Kiss Me, Kill Me to The Sweetest Thing and then to Beautiful Day, whilst not hugely different, more variation than the Gallagher's droning...

Posted by AndskiSpeed on Feb-06-2005 22:58:

quote:
Originally posted by kr00t0n
U2 by a mile, its the Oasis tracks that all sound the same to me.

Compare Hold Me, Thrill Me, Kiss Me, Kill Me to The Sweetest Thing and then to Beautiful Day, whilst not hugely different, more variation than the Gallagher's droning...

Hold me... fucking tune that is, thats my fave U2 song, nearly a masterpiece

Posted by isoterra on Feb-07-2005 05:33:

U2, though I like both.

both have pretty shit attitudes to be fair! only going by the music.

Posted by dex316 on Feb-08-2005 00:22:

hmmmmm some self-righteous-the-world-owes-me-a-favour-cos-of-all-the good-things-i-do apple sell-out or the uber john lennon wannabe

what a choice?

btw i voted u2 cos i really like sum of their songs (but bono's still a twat) and i cant stand liam gallagher no erm john lennon no gallagher no lennon no gallaher aaaaarrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhh!!!!!

Posted by Spad on Feb-08-2005 08:31:

Oasis.

Posted by A.J. on Feb-08-2005 14:23:

U2, although i like both bands.

So many classic songs that have stood the test of time....

Posted by chojin on Feb-08-2005 14:47:

quote:
Originally posted by Ian^
but RHCP still own them coup

+1

i think they're both alright, not 'amazing'. neither is better than the other though imo.

Posted by tu_face on Feb-08-2005 14:47:

both can fuck off and die

U2 have probably been more influential for longer. they were probably rocking stages when liam and noel were in nappies.

Posted by mentalbarter on Feb-08-2005 14:59:

wtf U2 are winning
you're all so wrong

Posted by tu_face on Feb-09-2005 10:24:

but oasis are sheeeeiiiiite

Posted by RubiK Cube on Feb-09-2005 12:22:

Definitely Maybe is one of the best albums ever, so Oasis > U2

Posted by rudi_vata on Feb-25-2005 02:05:

tough call,u2 r amazing,the fact they r still around & havent lost any members is good stat,but for me,prob because oasis appeared in my time & the way they came on the scene was exactly what was needed,when u look at the so called good bands 2day,franz ferdinand,keane,the all very good at what they do but they r not ROCK & ROLL stars, icant c any1 impacting like oasis did again

as i was writing this i had Oasis - Sad Song playing,noel gallagher is the best songwriter for a long time

Posted by TheWhiteRabbit on Feb-26-2005 09:06:

I love both bands, but I definitely like U2 more personally. Well, both bands respect each other and I believe in 1997 for U2's Pop Tour Oasis even opened up for U2 in Oakland, California in the States. Now that would have been an amazing fucken show to have attended!!!

Defintely going to try to get tickets for both bands as they tour this year!

Posted by Coup on Feb-26-2005 10:19:

im going to presume that the 6 people who voted theyre both crap are the "everythings shit unless its edm people".

Posted by tu_face on Feb-26-2005 10:32:

not entirely, i just think they are both shite

Posted by Kia Kaha on Feb-27-2005 23:15:

Old U2 just absolutely rocks ... not that Joshua Tree nonsense either ... Under a Blood Red Sky is just one of the greatest rock albums ever. That live version of '11 o'clock tick tock' just sends shivers down my spine. No Oasis track I've ever heard has even come close to that. So, U2 for me

Pages (2): « 1 [2]