Dreamcast vs PS2 vs Gamecube vs XboX

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Dreamcast vs PS2 vs Gamecube vs XboX
Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Posted by biznology on Nov-09-2001 00:29:

quote:
Originally posted by TeKnoHe@d2025

LoL, MGS2 is not coming out on XBox they are doing something with the original on XBox, but I'm not totally sure what it is.

...it's not always the hardware of the system that makes the system great, it's the games that count and not by graphics but by gameplay...

ok youre right, last i heard it was, but i honestly havent kept up on thhe xbox like i have the ps2, since i have one. and this^^ is what i was getting at to, specs and graphics cant say how good or successful a system will be...late/

Posted by TeKnoHe@d2025 on Nov-09-2001 03:05:

quote:
Originally posted by biznology

ok youre right, last i heard it was, but i honestly havent kept up on thhe xbox like i have the ps2, since i have one. and this^^ is what i was getting at to, specs and graphics cant say how good or successful a system will be...late/

Yep, if u rate a game or system depending on graphics and hardware specs. u're not a true gamer in my eyes.

Posted by lMIlk on Nov-09-2001 03:51:

i played gotham racing today its pretty good.

Posted by {b.s.e.} on Nov-09-2001 04:01:

Eh. Graphics are a plus, but gameplay is what I'm looking for..hence my boycot of xbox. Nintendo is all about fun.. take Smash Brothers for the 64..those graphics were so simplistic.. yet that game is the best game (imo) ever to grace a platform.

Posted by TeKnoHe@d2025 on Nov-09-2001 04:33:

Ok, while I'm still LMAO I'll post why I'm laughing...IGN asked this question: Which game would you buy an Xbox for?

Here are the results:

Posted by lMIlk on Nov-09-2001 05:03:

oddworld is a classic.

Posted by Excite on Nov-09-2001 06:39:

Yeah, I don't see the point in getting any other system besides the PS2 right now.

The Xbox graphics processor isn't that much more powerful than the PS2 processor. Even though its clocked at 700 mhz, its not a RISC chip. Plus Xbox doesn't have the developers that PS2 has...which is the same problem Nintendo has.

Posted by biznology on Nov-09-2001 19:11:

quote:
Originally posted by Excite

The Xbox graphics processor isn't that much more powerful than the PS2 processor. Even though its clocked at 700 mhz, its not a RISC chip. Plus Xbox doesn't have the developers that PS2 has...which is the same problem Nintendo has.

Yeah the difference in performance isnt that vast as it seems. xbox actually bought a LOT of the old great psx producers, so they do have some possible talent. adn i dont think that nintendo would ever have a problem with developers, being their inhouse developers are some of the very best, they could sell the console alone to a certain extent(nintendo, rare, factor 5<<) late/

Pages (2): « 1 [2]