vs versus featuring.. what's the difference?

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- vs versus featuring.. what's the difference?
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

Posted by RebeL9 on Feb-25-2005 15:40:

quote:
Originally posted by Ory

Now go listen to ASOT and drool over the next ch00n to be released on Anjunabeats.

haha. i like this quote.
ppl who drool about anjunatunes should be crucified at least :X

Posted by sleepydragon on Feb-25-2005 15:43:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: vs versus featuring.. what's the difference?

quote:
Originally posted by Ory
It's both "vs." and "feat.", ok?

GOD im getting pissed with u now thats what i said in the first place read the thread up to my post i was being abit sarcastic about the right and wrong thing with the previous post
LEARN TO READ POSTS PROPERLY uve just wasted a load of time and made urself look stupid in process as well as making urself another enemy

Posted by sleepydragon on Feb-25-2005 15:44:

quote:
Originally posted by RebeL9
haha. i like this quote.
ppl who drool about anjunatunes should be crucified at least :X

i dont even like trance that much anymore so at least i get away with being crucified by ory

Posted by Floorfiller on Feb-25-2005 15:44:

"vs"

is usually used for two situations as already mentioned...

1. a bootleg of two songs aka "Sasha vs Underworld - Cowpander"

and

2. a co-project with two known producers aka "Matt Hardwick vs Smith & Pledger - Connected"

so why are we still arguing?

Posted by Ory on Feb-25-2005 15:49:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: vs versus featuring.. what's the difference?

quote:
Originally posted by sleepydragon
i was being abit sarcastic about the right and wrong thing with the previous post

"" is often used to make fun of people. Believe me, I know. So no, it's not that obvious.

Oh, and...

Posted by sleepydragon on Feb-25-2005 15:52:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: vs versus featuring.. what's the difference?

quote:
Originally posted by Ory
"" is often used to make fun of people. Believe me, I know. So no, it's not that obvious.

Oh, and...

i never said it was obvious but ur the only clown that felt like having a argument about it i dont see anyone else having a problem.
Says something about u as a person

Posted by JochenHeiden on Feb-25-2005 15:54:

Thanks for the help, I guess. All I wanted was a straight answer, but instead, my post was hijacked and turned into a pissing contest.

I think I get the idea though. Can someone tell me what a white label is?

Forgive me for not knowing any of these terms. I am a recovering MP3-downloader turned to the light side. I'm in the process, slow process, of purchasing a lot of the music I'd downloaded a while back to make my collection legitimate. I just don't know what a lot of these little things mean.

Posted by Ory on Feb-25-2005 15:55:

yes, it shurly sez sumtin about the mentalyty of mien

btw u smell liek old sox

Posted by sleepydragon on Feb-25-2005 15:59:

quote:
Originally posted by JochenHeiden
I think I get the idea though. Can someone tell me what a white label is?

im not gonna answer that for u ory might attack me someone else can do it

Posted by sleepydragon on Feb-25-2005 16:01:

quote:
Originally posted by Ory
btw u smell liek old sox

go away please the only person that hijacked this thread was ory with chilish comments that no one finds funny.
I can imagine him right now giggling behind a computer screen

Posted by Floorfiller on Feb-25-2005 17:00:

quote:
Originally posted by JochenHeiden
Thanks for the help, I guess. All I wanted was a straight answer, but instead, my post was hijacked and turned into a pissing contest.

I think I get the idea though. Can someone tell me what a white label is?

Forgive me for not knowing any of these terms. I am a recovering MP3-downloader turned to the light side. I'm in the process, slow process, of purchasing a lot of the music I'd downloaded a while back to make my collection legitimate. I just don't know what a lot of these little things mean.

a white label is a promotional copy of a tune before it is officially signed to a record label.

Posted by Freak on Feb-25-2005 17:04:

Or a white label can actually be a promo of a tune distributed by the record label. It doesnt have to be unsigned.
In otherwords, a white label is a promo.

Posted by Floorfiller on Feb-25-2005 17:09:

quote:
Originally posted by Freak
Or a white label can actually be a promo of a tune distributed by the record label. It doesnt have to be unsigned.
In otherwords, a white label is a promo.

ok yeah hehe...its basically anything distributed before the official release...

Posted by aloep on Feb-25-2005 17:12:

Wow, I started this?

Posted by sleepydragon on Feb-25-2005 17:24:

quote:
Originally posted by aloep
Wow, I started this?

yep hope yer pleased with ur self

Posted by IntoTrance on Feb-25-2005 17:46:

Re: Re: vs versus featuring.. what's the difference?

quote:
Originally posted by Ory
So you know the word 'nomenclature', but you're unsure of what 'vs.' means? You sir, are a strange, strange person.

lol

Posted by Phil r on Feb-25-2005 18:42:

stop talking such *ankness.

it's got *uck all to do with that.

VERSUS is when the person who originally had the conept for the tune only came up with the chorus, and couldn't think how to finish it. then someone else comes along and writes the verse for it.

plural of verse is versus.

see.

FEAT means that a (usually) female singer came along, and thought the tune was crap without vocals, so she sang all over it, and re-released it under a a remix rework, which was re mastered and re written.

Posted by Ory on Feb-25-2005 18:51:

You've got to be kidding me.

Posted by deknician on Feb-25-2005 18:58:

Posted by deknician on Feb-25-2005 19:18:

quote:
Originally posted by Phil raa

plural of verse is versus.

see.

Someone PLEASE tell me this is a joke, cos it is pretty hilarious.

Posted by Phil r on Feb-25-2005 19:23:

ehhhhhm

hum

Posted by sandstorm03 on Feb-25-2005 19:30:

quote:
Originally posted by Floorfiller
a white label is a promotional copy of a tune before it is officially signed to a record label.

there is still no release that is Jurgen Vries vs Andrea Britton - Take My Hand

Posted by sleepydragon on Feb-25-2005 20:37:

quote:
Originally posted by sandstorm03
there is still no release that is Jurgen Vries vs Andrea Britton - Take My Hand

no one said there was

promo = D.T vs A.B - take my hand
full release = Jurgen Vries Feat. andrea britton - take my hand

Posted by sandstorm03 on Feb-25-2005 20:38:

quote:
Originally posted by sleepydragon
no one said there was

promo = D.T vs A.B - take my hand
full release = Jurgen Vries Feat. andrea britton - take my hand

so the mp3 must be mislabeled

Posted by deknician on Feb-28-2005 12:42:

quote:
Originally posted by Phil raa
stop talking such *ankness.

it's got *uck all to do with that.

VERSUS is when the person who originally had the conept for the tune only came up with the chorus, and couldn't think how to finish it. then someone else comes along and writes the verse for it.

plural of verse is versus.

see.

FEAT means that a (usually) female singer came along, and thought the tune was crap without vocals, so she sang all over it, and re-released it under a a remix rework, which was re mastered and re written.

The plural of verse is verses, and your argument doesn't really hold for most trance records, which don't even have a chorus. Think instrumentals...?

And as for the featuring issue, well usually the original producer asks a vocalist to work with him/her in the first place, not the other way round as you imply.

Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »