TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Bomb Blast in NYC
Pages (2): « 1 [2]
does it really matter the way al-quaida is organised. the fact is that it exists and is carrying out terrorist attacks. whether or not its another group affiliated to them with another name doesnt make any difference. if anything the fact that the gov group all islamic terrists as 'linked to al-Q' is underplaying the threat. if they went about differentiating the different groups it could be seen to be swarm of islamic terrorism, overbearing on the western world.
as for defence contracts...dont they keep the economy stable? they are one of the few manufacturing industries left in a lot of countries
| quote: |
| Originally posted by svens_bath does it really matter the way al-quaida is organised. |
| quote: |
| the fact is that it exists and is carrying out terrorist attacks. whether or not its another group affiliated to them with another name doesnt make any difference. |
| quote: |
| if anything the fact that the gov group all islamic terrists as 'linked to al-Q' is underplaying the threat. if they went about differentiating the different groups it could be seen to be swarm of islamic terrorism, overbearing on the western world. |
I'll add to that that al-Qaida (ie bin Laden and his close associates, not the freelancers) are using this war on terror as much as Bush is. They seem to form a sybiotic relationship where the more each of them act the more benefits the other stands to gain. Bush wants to exert control over the world (esp Middle East) and bin Laden wants shit loads of supporters for his cause (and no, his cause is not taking over the world or even destroying the "Great Satan" America)
all the islamic terrorists want the same thing. what started as a backlash against the isreal situation has developed into a hatred of American-democracy and the West
im not saying there is a sawarm of islamic terorirsm, but i am saying that thats how it could be perceived if you start differentiating between all the gruops. the terrorist threat could then be exagerated.
i dont think islamists are trying to take over the world...they want to bring down the West that they see is the Devil, in some misguided holywar. thats the reality. i think people have, via distrust of tony blair, begun to disregard the islaimic terrorist threat as a Michal Moore conspiracy. theyre stil out there, and theyre coming to get your flower pots!!!
| quote: |
| Originally posted by svens_bath all the islamic terrorists want the same thing. what started as a backlash against the isreal situation has developed into a hatred of American-democracy and the West im not saying there is a sawarm of islamic terorirsm, but i am saying that thats how it could be perceived if you start differentiating between all the gruops. the terrorist threat could then be exagerated. i dont think islamists are trying to take over the world...they want to bring down the West that they see is the Devil, in some misguided holywar. thats the reality. i think people have, via distrust of tony blair, begun to disregard the islaimic terrorist threat as a Michal Moore conspiracy. theyre stil out there, and theyre coming to get your flower pots!!! |
i doubt they will take down the West, but that is their aim. like i said groups like hizbollah started with an isreal agenda, but i dont think its too far-fetched to suggest that they have engaged the whole taking down the West cause now.
NI i dont know too much about. if they have the same ideology are they not generally grouped together as unionists or republicans anyway?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by svens_bath i doubt they will take down the West, but that is their aim. like i said groups like hizbollah started with an isreal agenda, but i dont think its too far-fetched to suggest that they have engaged the whole taking down the West cause now. NI i dont know too much about. if they have the same ideology are they not generally grouped together as unionists or republicans anyway? |
Sorry, you actually claim Hizballah ARE engaging in "bringing the West down"!!!
hizbollah are anti-us right? well isnt that pretty much anti-Western? i dont subscribe to the Hizbollah Herald or nowt, but i think if they had the chance they would want to bring down the West which is the root of their problems. im not saying they are linked to al-Q, just they share a similar general aim as far as im concerned. anti-isreal meaning they formed in response to the isreal invasion of lebanon.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by svens_bath hizbollah are anti-us right? well isnt that pretty much anti-Western? i dont subscribe to the Hizbollah Herald or nowt, but i think if they had the chance they would want to bring down the West which is the root of their problems. im not saying they are linked to al-Q, just they share a similar general aim as far as im concerned. anti-isreal meaning they formed in response to the isreal invasion of lebanon. |
And anti-America means anti-American government. Hizballah (in fact I even recall bin Laden saying something similar) has no problems with American citizens and it may come as a surprise to you but I can assure you neither group is trying to "destroy" America (or anywhere else in the world for that matter)
what was 9/11 then..looked to me like an attack on America and its citizens..an attack on a western capitalist symbol..which bin laden took the blame for..so i think his aims have extended beyond the middle east. if the extremist muslims had theyre way they would want to take down the West.
hizbollah are anti-us..so are al-Q, i think theres a valid comparison there.
as for the plfp and the ira they are only thinly similar in ideology of independece..that way you could argue that the snp are like kashmiri separitists. al-Q and Hisbollah are both islamist groups who share a similar islamic outlook on the world..and are therefore more likely to be syspmathetic to each other's cause. muslims identify with the plights of other muslims all over the world.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by svens_bath what was 9/11 then..looked to me like an attack on America and its citizens..an attack on a western capitalist symbol..which bin laden took the blame for..so i think his aims have extended beyond the middle east. if the extremist muslims had theyre way they would want to take down the West. hizbollah are anti-us..so are al-Q, i think theres a valid comparison there. as for the plfp and the ira they are only thinly similar in ideology of independece..that way you could argue that the snp are like kashmiri separitists. al-Q and Hisbollah are both islamist groups who share a similar islamic outlook on the world..and are therefore more likely to be syspmathetic to each other's cause. muslims identify with the plights of other muslims all over the world. |
whther the pflp and ira are close in Marxist ideology or not..muslims will still be sympathetic to the muslim cause, and so i dont think you can explicitly say that they dont have anti-Western sentiments.
ok even if osama bin laden doesnt want to take down the west, hes provoked a reaction from the west that has engaged many disaffected muslim youths who are now taking anti-western stances, and whether he likes it or not, hes provoked a war on islam, which will provoke a reaction against the West
you constantly hear muslims denounce the way of the west. sounds to me like they would take down the western way of life if they could.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by svens_bath whther the pflp and ira are close in Marxist ideology or not..muslims will still be sympathetic to the muslim cause, and so i dont think you can explicitly say that they dont have anti-Western sentiments. |
| quote: |
| ok even if osama bin laden doesnt want to take down the west, hes provoked a reaction from the west that has engaged many disaffected muslim youths who are now taking anti-western stances, and whether he likes it or not, hes provoked a war on islam, which will provoke a reaction against the West |
| quote: |
| you constantly hear muslims denounce the way of the west. sounds to me like they would take down the western way of life if they could. |
but osama bin laden doesnt control al-Q they are splintered and some may organise under the al-Q banner with their own agenda.this is what my original point is. osama bin laden's aims arent the same as those joining him. go down to your local mosque and im sure youll find a general consensus of a hatred of amemrica and its way of life. like i have said quite a few times, i dont think that they could take down the us, or its way of life..but Ahmed down the mosque probably does.
whther or not they publicly reject al-Q, there are undoubtedly memebers of either gropu that support the al-q cause, and who knows what they could do in the future. after all these groups are a source of power for their leaders. if they settled their local disputes do you think they will just pack in the gun-slinging and go back to selling magic carpets? i dont think so, there is the possibility that they could turn their attention on what they see as global injustices in the muslim world.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by svens_bath but osama bin laden doesnt control al-Q they are splintered and some may organise under the al-Q banner with their own agenda.this is what my original point is. osama bin laden's aims arent the same as those joining him. go down to your local mosque and im sure youll find a general consensus of a hatred of amemrica and its way of life. like i have said quite a few times, i dont think that they could take down the us, or its way of life..but Ahmed down the mosque probably does. |
| quote: |
| whther or not they publicly reject al-Q, there are undoubtedly memebers of either gropu that support the al-q cause, and who knows what they could do in the future. after all these groups are a source of power for their leaders. if they settled their local disputes do you think they will just pack in the gun-slinging and go back to selling magic carpets? i dont think so, there is the possibility that they could turn their attention on what they see as global injustices in the muslim world. |
well if theyre polticial parties then they arent to be included as terrorist gropus and so wouldnt be linked to al-q. but if they are terorist gropus all im saying is that you cant rule out the possibility that one day they make decide to take on the west. there is strong anti-western setniment in the muslim world, which is why your seeing a return by many muslims to a greater observence of their religion.. i think that this could translate into an anti-western stance by members of any islamic group.
you will never be able to get rid of this islamic threat. its here to stay until the end of time now. many muslims see this as a sign of the end of the earth; judgement day. also niether party will budge on their demands.
bosnia wasnt a terorist threat. it was a humanitarian situation, the muslims did not create a threat, so you wouldnt regard them as an islamist threat. i amn't saying lump all muslims as terrorists..just the ones that make bombs.
we wil have to agree to disagree on our assessment of the threat of islamist terror..ive finished studying for the night so im off.
peace in the middle east
pressed submit by acident there..im editing it to finish it off
somebody blew up tiesto! 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by svens_bath well if theyre polticial parties then they arent to be included as terrorist gropus and so wouldnt be linked to al-q. but if they are terorist gropus all im saying is that you cant rule out the possibility that one day they make decide to take on the west. there is strong anti-western setniment in the muslim world, which is why your seeing a return by many muslims to a greater observence of their religion.. i think that this could translate into an anti-western stance by members of any islamic group. |
| quote: |
| you will never be able to get rid of this islamic threat. its here to stay until the end of time now. many muslims see this as a sign of the end of the earth; judgement day. also niether party will budge on their demands. |
| quote: |
| bosnia wasnt a terorist threat. it was a humanitarian situation, the muslims did not create a threat, so you wouldnt regard them as an islamist threat. i amn't saying lump all muslims as terrorists..just the ones that make bombs. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by shaolin_Z somebody blew up tiesto! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lira Sadly, terrorists don't do favours |
I guess that can be interpreted in more ways than one. I was being corny. Tiesto means flowerpot in spanish. DJ Flowerpot
| quote: |
| Originally posted by shaolin_Z hehe I guess that can be interpreted in more ways than one. I was being corny. Tiesto means flowerpot in spanish. DJ Flowerpot |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.