TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Sad day for Ontario
Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Thracky Getting wet doesn't cause cancer and millions of dollars in health care costs last I checked. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Thracky Getting wet doesn't cause cancer and millions of dollars in health care costs last I checked. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by loca This is why we should have private healthcare option. So people could stop fucking whining about how it's going to cost them money, blah blah blah. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jayx1 great let me opt out so i dont have to listen to this bullshit arguement. And if i knowingly choose activities that could be hazardous to my health thats my choice. Im guessing based on your comment above that you dont eat fast food, have sex, do drugs or drink alcohol. Otherwise you might be a hypocrite. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Thracky Move to the states then. That way you can smoke, carry a gun, and pay retarded amounts of money for healthcare! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Thracky It's got nothing to do with being a hypocrite, I just choose to do things that are not AS detrimental to my health, smoking is one of the stupidest habits to develop ever, and I've had MANY smokers tell me this themselves. How many deaths PER year does weed cause in comparison to tobacco? or Alcohol? Regardless, your comments have absolutely no relevance to the discussion at hand. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Thracky Move to the states then. That way you can smoke, carry a gun, and pay retarded amounts of money for healthcare! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jayx1 Actually europe has a mix of public and private care. Canada is the only country i know of with this disaster experiment. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jayx1 Actually europe has a mix of public and private care. Canada is the only country i know of with this disaster experiment. |
BTW we already pay ridiculous amounts to health care...
Have you seen your tax bill lately?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Thracky So does Alberta actually, where people with money can get stuff done quickly and people who don't have money wait months and months. I was going to have to wait 6 months for an MRI on my knee but we paid 700 bucks and got it done within 2 days. Not that this is a bad thing mind you, I was happy about it. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jayx1 ok you just fell into my trap. Not AS hazardous? Really? So you are telling me basically that as long as you choose to do something its ok even though there is a health risk but if you dont do something no one else should either. And tell me that drugs and booze arent as hazardous and i laugh like this ----> hahahahahaha Interesting You are ALMOST as ridiculous as those health concious vegans who get high and drink their lives away.... ALMOST |
Regarding Loca---- Its funny how a european who many here regard to be "socialists" and whom liberals in canada look to for inspiration has what many would consider to be conservative views in canada. Its funny also how real liberal thinkers elsewhere actually believe in freedom as opposed to the left wing social engineers that exist in this country.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Thracky Ah just because I partake every once in a while doesn't mean I'm a chronic weed smoker and an alcoholic. Frankly weed and alcohol aren't nearly as addictive as niccotine. I'd say smoking a pack a day of smokes or inhaling 5 packs worth of second hand smoke is probably far worse than a joint a couple times a month, or a few beers on the weekends. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jayx1 I hope you dont do sports...why should I have to pay for your knee surgury? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jayx1 I hope you dont do sports...why should I have to pay for your knee surgury? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Thracky Most high performance athletes get stuff done privately, either in Alberta or in the US somewhere hehe. Also an MRI isn't surgery, but it did eventually lead to my surgery which WAS covered by the government ;-) |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Matt and I don't wanna pay for smokers who need help from the healthcare system. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jayx1 And i enter a bar with smoking once a week. Not nearly as bad as breathing in the fumes of cars every day is it? Bottom line is that you do things for recreation that could cost the health care system money. So you should just leave smokers alone too. You dont have to breath in smoke under the current laws anyways so whats your problem with DSRs? |
Please understand that im not defending the act of smoking. I made my CHOICE not to start. What im saying is that someone who indulges in vices has no moral authority to tell others that they cannot smoke. Smoking is a choice one makes. No one forces anyone to start and people know that its addictive before they do.
For you to tell people that they should not smoke while admitting to drinking and getting high smacks of hypocrisy. Not to mention that you keep bringing up the health care issue which has already been answered by a number of people.
That arguement just does not work.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jayx1 Please understand that im not defending the act of smoking. I made my CHOICE not to start. What im saying is that someone who indulges in vices has no moral authority to tell others that they cannot smoke. Smoking is a choice one makes. No one forces anyone to start and people know that its addictive before they do. For you to tell people that they should not smoke while admitting to drinking and getting high smacks of hypocrisy. Not to mention that you keep bringing up the health care issue which has already been answered by a number of people. That arguement just does not work. |
There are lots of people who chronically drink and get high. There are also a lot of casual smokers. Your arguement is very weak. It is very much a black and white issue. Your issue is that you dont partake in it so why should others? I bet you are the first to wonder why they cant legalize weed yet support smoking bans.
The status quo amounts to gov't taxation on the legalized DRUG ADDICTION that currently exists...and then the gov't also covers the resultant health related costs...how ridiculous.
I understand that business have concerns over lost revenue...that's fine...but watching DRUG ADDICTS (that's what most smokers are) fight for their right to remain an addict and be able to satiate that addiction wherever they want...it's somewhat disturbing and perversely comical at the same time.
*flame away*
seriously though...I support the previous bylaw...but not this new one. DSRs should be allowed.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jayx1 There are lots of people who chronically drink and get high. There are also a lot of casual smokers. Your arguement is very weak. It is very much a black and white issue. Your issue is that you dont partake in it so why should others? I bet you are the first to wonder why they cant legalize weed yet support smoking bans. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MarkT The status quo amounts to gov't taxation on the legalized DRUG ADDICTION that currently exists...and then the gov't also covers the resultant health related costs...how ridiculous. I understand that business have concerns over lost revenue...that's fine...but watching DRUG ADDICTS (that's what most smokers are) fight for their right to remain an addict and be able to satiate that addiction wherever they want...it's somewhat disturbing and perversely comical at the same time. *flame away* seriously though...I support the previous bylaw...but not this new one. DSRs should be allowed. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.