TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- how long does it usualy take for labels to get back to you...if they do!
Pages (2): « 1 [2]


Posted by qiushiming on Sep-21-2005 08:55:

quote:
Originally posted by RiCo
Hey bro, why don't you try making a more massive, faster version of the song? I am pretty sure it would get signed if it had a faster, busier rhythm, you know. Maybe it's too mellow the way it is now. =)


+1
Dunno if you mind this being a comment on your track...but I think it would definitely be signable with a clearer, massive climax...and as rico mentioned, faster and busier...


Posted by Limit on Sep-22-2005 01:39:

I dont mind at all. I might look into doing something different with it but for now I like it the way it is and I would rather start on something new.


Posted by tonkproject on Sep-22-2005 02:37:

quote:
Originally posted by Limit
sent it off to like 12 labels and nobody likes it....I think that I'm sending to the wrong labels?? Any suggestions for labels to send to? I dont know much. I just used most of the ones on the ETN page and a few others.

If my track just sucks and is not good enough then well thats fine with me cause for once I am satisfied with something I have done.


m8 .... great track...100% signable but you just made a BIG MISTAKE by posting the tune 192kb on a public forum.usually labels wont sign anything that already is spread on the net...
anyway,go at BEATPORT and listen to some tunes from the same genre as yours.if you find something that might be "similar" to yours - CONTACT THE LABEL.dont expect quick answers since most of them receive loads of material weekly and a lot of them does not get even listen.i received answers after 2 months but most of them didnt even bother to write me back.

KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK


Posted by dRale on Sep-22-2005 05:36:

have you mixed the track before sending it in?


Posted by Limit on Sep-22-2005 11:11:

quote:
Originally posted by tonkproject
m8 .... great track...100% signable but you just made a BIG MISTAKE by posting the tune 192kb on a public forum.


thats not the final track...or the final mixdown.


Posted by djbruuen on Sep-22-2005 15:00:

not a bad melody, i obviously can't comment on your mastered version, but in this version the bass sounds very mushy. i'm listening to it on my monitors right now and its seems like everything is just mushing together. anyone that says this song should be busier is on crack. i'd definately redo that bass so the song doesn't sound as congested together. has potential, but definately needs work and some cleaning up to get signed (and maybe you've already done that since this isnt' the final copy, so can't comment)


Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.