proposed rules #1 - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Australia
-- proposed rules #1
Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »

Posted by OLi_A on Oct-25-2005 09:20:

quote:
Originally posted by narcism
excuse me where is #14?

hi there
asl?

Posted by 3jaz on Oct-25-2005 09:57:

hahahah! love ur work

good luck!

Posted by j�c� on Oct-25-2005 14:03:

i agree, i think the no bumping is a bit silly

and also definately separate DJ promo and producer promo stickys

Posted by escee on Oct-25-2005 14:35:

I for one welcome our new supreme overlord.

Posted by Fpcookie on Oct-25-2005 15:47:

instead of no bumping, why dont u say no bringing back dead threads? which is what i assume u mean? ie threads that have no relevence anymore.

Posted by eRRaTiK on Oct-25-2005 21:04:

quote:
Originally posted by Fpcookie
instead of no bumping, why dont u say no bringing back dead threads? which is what i assume u mean? ie threads that have no relevence anymore.

no, she was referring to event threads.

old thread revivals FTW!

Posted by charlee on Oct-25-2005 23:38:

quote:
Originally posted by Simon00
Should def allow all white supremacy threads, they are quality.

You can have that but no more fake Midro posts

Posted by jizza on Oct-26-2005 00:18:

quote:
Originally posted by escee
I for one welcome our new supreme overlord.

the regime has sparked hope...

Posted by sezzy on Oct-26-2005 00:21:

quote:
Originally posted by narcism

Why?

because its ridiculous. if we've started a thread about an up-coming
event and it's slowly gone to the next page, as they sometimes do, we should be able to bump it again to continue discussions.

the rule should be once the event is over, no-one should be allowed to bump it after a week has passed.

Posted by narcism on Oct-26-2005 01:00:

quote:
Originally posted by sezzy
if we've started a thread about an up-coming
event and it's slowly gone to the next page, as they sometimes do, we should be able to bump it again to continue discussions.

If its down so low obviously it wasnt sparking enough interest in the first place.

Posted by sezzy on Oct-26-2005 01:03:

that's not true. sometimes if heaps of new threads are getting started at the same time or if the thread has been going for a while, things can easily slip down the list.

that doesn't mean that people won't want to discuss the event as the date gets closer and things such as set times, etc are released.

Posted by charlee on Oct-26-2005 01:06:

I dont think a bump here or there is really an issue

Posted by Aesthetic on Oct-26-2005 01:07:

ABUSE OF POWER!

Posted by rez on Oct-26-2005 01:07:

i think its time to impeach the mod

Posted by narcism on Oct-26-2005 01:09:

quote:
Originally posted by sezzy

that doesn't mean that people won't want to discuss the event as the date gets closer and things such as set times, etc are released.

Then re-read what the rule says

quote:
Information updates to an event are allowed within reason.

Posted by Dean Millson on Oct-26-2005 01:09:

Listen...

can anyone hear Pandora's box opening?

*grabs popcorn*

Posted by Aesthetic on Oct-26-2005 01:10:

Sorry Dean, I farted.. that was the noise you heard.

PS. Vote for PEDRO.

Posted by charlee on Oct-26-2005 01:11:

quote:
Originally posted by Dean Millson
Listen...

can anyone hear Pandora's box opening?

*grabs popcorn*

Who is Pandora when she's at home?

Posted by sezzy on Oct-26-2005 02:36:

quote:
Originally posted by narcism
Then re-read what the rule says

ok so that means that people can't bump the thread to discuss it unless they're posting more information?

thats ridiculous.

the no bump rule should only apply to old threads

Posted by jono4L on Oct-26-2005 02:55:

i agree with sezzy because i dont get to read TA every day and i rarely look at any threads that have fallen off the first page.

Posted by Philby on Oct-26-2005 04:01:

quote:
Originally posted by jono4L
i agree with sezzy because i dont get to read TA every day and i rarely look at any threads that have fallen off the first page.

well then thats your problem! too lazy to click 'next page'???

Posted by Dean Millson on Oct-26-2005 04:04:

How often would you say you did that yourself Philby?

Posted by Philby on Oct-26-2005 04:05:

every few days, or whenever i cant see a thread on the first page i wanted to read.

Posted by jono4L on Oct-26-2005 04:06:

haha yeah i guess it is.... oh well maybe i just shouldnt be allowed to know about or go to events that i let slip through to the 2nd page. my bad.

Posted by Philby on Oct-26-2005 04:26:

problem solved

Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »