TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Australia
-- The help me procrastinate on my assignment thread.
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »


Posted by alex_cooke on Oct-27-2005 04:22:

Lol

AC -x0x-


Posted by eROs.au on Oct-27-2005 04:28:

LMAO!!!!!


Posted by Teflon_Teapot on Oct-27-2005 04:39:

mmmm exams in two weeks time


Posted by narcism on Oct-27-2005 04:51:

quote:
Originally posted by alex_cooke
The Wife of Martin Guerre.


we done that book in yr 11
such a drainer


Posted by Philby on Oct-27-2005 07:12:

hey do any of you find it interesting reading old journal papers on topics that are now commonly accepted but then were not widely known or accepted? i'm reading a paper by wilson called "continental drift" which was published before plate tectonics was established, and i think its really interesting to read about ideas and concepts that are now taken for granted or assumed but then were either controversial ideas or not even invented/existed yet! ie now everybody knows (well i mean like everyone doing geology) that the plates (they didn't have plates then, just continents!) move around and we had supercontinents and stuff, but at the time people talking about stuff like that were laughed at and told "get stuffed thats prepostorous". anyways i think its pretty interesting...



x=5


Posted by narcism on Oct-27-2005 07:58:

quote:
Originally posted by Philby
hey do any of you find it interesting reading old journal papers on topics that are now commonly accepted but then were not widely known or accepted?


no


Posted by Philby on Oct-27-2005 08:07:

quote:
Originally posted by narcism
no


haha

wouldnt you find it interesting reading an article by someone who invented some nursing procedure you now use as a standard? or came up with some new discovery or drug or technique and got laughed at at the time?


Posted by narcism on Oct-27-2005 08:15:

quote:
Originally posted by Philby
wouldnt you find it interesting reading an article by someone who invented some nursing procedure you now use as a standard? or came up with some new discovery or drug or technique and got laughed at at the time?


no


Posted by Antistatic on Oct-27-2005 08:28:

quote:
Originally posted by chea

x=5


Posted by Philby on Oct-27-2005 08:40:

jon i already worked x out 4 posts earlier!!

quote:
Originally posted by narcism
no


haha again
i guess you wouldnt though, getting other people to write your essays for you


Posted by Dj_Es-Dva on Oct-27-2005 11:19:

quote:
Originally posted by Philby
whats your physics assignment? i did physics at year 11. although not that well actually hehe.


its the end of year one and its on electricity and i dont know how to do it, so i came on TA. if anyone can help that would be cool


Posted by Philby on Oct-27-2005 11:22:

a little more specific....?


Posted by Trance Nutter on Oct-27-2005 11:24:

If anyone here's ever done any Flow Cytometry, please give me a yell. I'm in dire need of assistance.


Posted by Philby on Oct-27-2005 11:27:

quote:
Originally posted by Trance Nutter
If anyone here's ever done any Flow Cytometry, please give me a yell. I'm in dire need of assistance.


haha what the hell is that?


Posted by Trance Nutter on Oct-27-2005 11:30:

quote:
Originally posted by Philby
haha what the hell is that?


the most barstardised experiment ever.

I hate it with a passion. It should be a piece of piss, but it never works.


Posted by Philby on Oct-27-2005 11:33:

something to do with cells and biology?


Posted by Trance Nutter on Oct-27-2005 11:52:

quote:
Originally posted by Philby
something to do with cells and biology?


good guess

basically the idea is that you label cells using particular dyes. Each dye represents somthing different, eg one represents a dead cell, so any detection of this dye and you know the cell is dead. The cells are passed one at a time in a liquid stream (ie flow) past a detector (spectrometer), which lasers them and picks up the dye signal, hence telling you the proprtion of cells with each dye.

Sounds easy.


Posted by Dj_Es-Dva on Oct-27-2005 12:05:

ok well ive got this:
----|-*-/
....*...*
----|-/
okay so its a crazy triangular circuit right with the * representing resistors and i need to get the total resistance im confused what you use:
series = Rt = R1 + R2 + R3
OR
parallel = 1/Rt = 1/R1 + 1/R2 + 1/R3

or a mixture

edit: pretend the .'s arent there it screws up with out them the diagram lol


Posted by Philby on Oct-27-2005 12:31:

from the way u drew that picture it looks like there are 2 resistors in series and 1 parallel to it so maybe do it like that...but don't rely on just me.....

quote:
Originally posted by Trance Nutter
Sounds easy.


but.....?


Posted by Antistatic on Oct-27-2005 15:27:

Break up the problem into parts that are in series and work out total resistance there (like mini-circuits), then you will have a few different "subtotal" resistances that are in parallel.


Posted by Antistatic on Oct-27-2005 15:30:

My references section is about 10% of the length of the actual essay lol


Posted by Teflon_Teapot on Oct-28-2005 02:29:

quote:
hey do any of you find it interesting reading old journal papers on topics that are now commonly accepted but then were not widely known or accepted? i'm reading a paper by wilson called "continental drift" which was published before plate tectonics was established, and i think its really interesting to read about ideas and concepts that are now taken for granted or assumed but then were either controversial ideas or not even invented/existed yet! ie now everybody knows (well i mean like everyone doing geology) that the plates (they didn't have plates then, just continents!) move around and we had supercontinents and stuff, but at the time people talking about stuff like that were laughed at and told "get stuffed thats prepostorous". anyways i think its pretty interesting...


i have got a book called standing on the shoulders of giants, and it basically has the theories of copernicus, kepler, newton and einstein. i also did a subject called the history and philosophy of astronomy, which studied texts from ancient greece up until copernicus and some of the things that are written if you take them in context with the time they were written are incredible. although the language that they use is very bizarre and hard to understand.


Posted by Philby on Oct-28-2005 09:23:

quote:
Originally posted by Teflon_Teapot
i have got a book called standing on the shoulders of giants, and it basically has the theories of copernicus, kepler, newton and einstein. i also did a subject called the history and philosophy of astronomy, which studied texts from ancient greece up until copernicus and some of the things that are written if you take them in context with the time they were written are incredible. although the language that they use is very bizarre and hard to understand.


haha yeah it would have been crazier back then, ie "the earth is not the centre of the universe? blasphemy! recant, or die!!!"
i wouldn't mind reading some of the old original ideas. but even newton was influenced a lot by religion with some of his stuff, its cool how people can come up with things that go totally against what is set in stone so to speak and stick by them, and then get proved right later hehe. how long did it take for the catholic church to accept galileos ideas? i think it was a few hundred years for anything official?


Posted by Philby on Oct-28-2005 09:23:

oh yeah one exam out of the way w00t!!! i think i did good too!!!


Posted by alex_cooke on Oct-28-2005 09:43:

quote:
Originally posted by Philby
oh yeah one exam out of the way w00t!!! i think i did good too!!!


Yeah, got my first exam out of the way today too. Ick. So glad its over, i also think i did really well cause the topic for the language analysis and point of view were really easy for me (how technology can help communication).

Happy now, only 5 exams to go before its all over (well, High school anyway)

AC -x0x-


Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.