TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Which country you think will US attack next?
Pages (6): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 »


Posted by zookeeper on Nov-21-2005 04:06:

I would like to hope that any future politicians will soon realize that going to war (unless enemy troops are landing on the Jersey shore) is career suicide.

I think the American people have had it with these "police action" wars and hopefully, after this chapter is closed, we will start to address the real internal problems that we (U.S) have.

A war with China would be THE end for all of us, having been there myself and seen the true nature of the Chinese people, making war (with the U.S. or anyone else, really) is not in their best interest. Taiwan is a flashpoint but I doubt if it would lead to all out war.


...but who knows, I hope I don't live to see it.


Posted by Trancer-X on Nov-21-2005 04:07:

quote:
Originally posted by Lepanto
yes luxembourg. america currently has it's mass population sleeping in the streets, with rioting and looting in major cities, enourmous unemployment and inflation, 12 people living in one room shacks and so on


Those of us who ARE doing conspicuously and consumptively well are living on mostly borrowed money. And our thriving populace must surely include those already forgotten Gulf War veterans (who make up 10% of our country's homeless veteran population.)

In Los Angeles County, CA alone, there are around 100,000 homeless people on any given day.

quote:


  • The number of people below the official poverty thresholds numbered 35.9 million in 2003, or 1.3 million more than in 2002, for a 2003 poverty rate of 12.5 percent. Although up from 2002, this rate is below the average of the 1980s and 1990s.

  • The poverty rate and number of families in poverty increased from 9.6 percent and 7.2 million in 2002 to 10.0 percent and 7.6 million in 2003. The corresponding numbers for unrelated individuals in poverty in 2003 were 20.4 percent and 9.7 million (not different from 2002).


  • Hidalgo County, Texas (38.0 percent), and Cameron County, Texas (36.5 percent), had poverty rates higher than those of the other 231 counties, though not different from one another.


http://www.census.gov/Press-Release...lth/002484.html


quote:
Census Bureau says 1.3 million more slipped into poverty last year; health care coverage also drops.

August 26, 2004: 1:54 PM EDT

WASHINGTON (CNN) - The number of Americans living in poverty jumped to 35.9 million last year, up by 1.3 million, while the number of those without health care insurance rose to 45 million from 43.6 million in 2002, the U.S. government said in a report Thursday.

http://money.cnn.com/2004/08/26/new...poverty_survey/


Posted by zookeeper on Nov-21-2005 04:20:

quote:
Originally posted by Trancer-X
Those of us who ARE doing conspicuously and consumptively well are living on mostly borrowed money.




OH MAN are you correct on that one!! Could you imagine if the foreign banking giants (like HSBC) suddenly foreclosed on all outstanding debt, we would be screwed as a country *Ka putt*


Posted by JM on Nov-21-2005 04:44:

well i think either N. Korea or Iran are next. I mean, it just makes most sense... they gotta build a case before they attack, and they're getting at it. so sometime within the next year or so.

>JM<


Posted by zookeeper on Nov-21-2005 04:58:

quote:
Originally posted by JM
well i think either N. Korea or Iran are next. I mean, it just makes most sense... they gotta build a case before they attack, and they're getting at it. so sometime within the next year or so.

>JM<


I don't think the upper power circle could even build a "case" for violin right now, with the American people being so skeptical about ANY new military action, unless there was a direct attack on U.S. soil, again, with a clear aggressor.


Posted by malek on Nov-21-2005 07:01:

Syria!!!

please?


Posted by Lepanto on Nov-21-2005 08:21:

quote:
Originally posted by Trancer-X
Those of us who ARE doing conspicuously and consumptively well are living on mostly borrowed money. And our thriving populace must surely include those already forgotten Gulf War veterans (who make up 10% of our country's homeless veteran population.)

In Los Angeles County, CA alone, there are around 100,000 homeless people on any given day.





Yet, most of those have an established line of credit and aren't about to lose their homes tommora morning. Even more so, none of them are going to take up arms against the governemtn. Which was the original point


Posted by Purple on Nov-21-2005 11:05:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Which country will US attack next?

quote:
Originally posted by Lepanto

BTW, a country is usually recognised or not by the UN not the US, fool.


But silly, US think it owns the UN.


Posted by Purple on Nov-21-2005 11:09:

quote:
Originally posted by metalgearsolid
China.


US is shit scared of China, it can only attack small, weak and crippled countries like Afganistan, Iraq, Libia etc. And is it.

They dont have guts or ass to attack China. Because they know China will wipe their history off from planet Earth if US attacks them.


Posted by Lepanto on Nov-21-2005 12:36:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Which country will US attack next?

quote:
Originally posted by Purple
But silly, US think it owns the UN.


Re-read what you've just said


So just because the US "thinks" it owns the UN; UN itself doesn't recognize countries? don't you think you mean it controls the UN which it doesn't. IDK if you follow any sort of international news.

Furthermore, how much does the UN help? not too much now. They come up with settlement plans and referendums for countries that want no help that way from them. They threaten action yet do NOTHING. Cyprus, ex-Yugoslavian conflict, Chechnya, oh and Somalia, the UN goes in, around 1993 when it barely has helped people out of famine, takes on some casualties and leaves! and speaking of Somalia, the northern Somaliland is also not recognized by any government.


and you clearly don't know history do ya?


Posted by Zombie0915 on Nov-21-2005 14:32:

Syria or Iran I think will be next.

Not that I wish for them to happen of course, but I think this Iraq stuff is only the beginning of a larger campaign in the middle east to weed out the groups that want to destroy us. I think though that the war is only breeding more of those people who want to see the USA burn.

I hope we can all get along one of these days but I dont see how it can happen when there is a huge group of extremists dedicated to killing as many westerners as possible.


Posted by Groundhog Boy on Nov-21-2005 16:50:

It just baffles me that people haven't realized from looking at history that you can kill the people with your military, but you can't kill the ideas. Most times it plays out like it is now, and just serves to strengthen their ideology and give them justification in the eyes of many to continue their opposition.

That said, Iran's next. I don't think we'll go after North Korea even though they're the more dangerous one of the two. There's no way the US public will support a war that will have causualty rates as large as they'd be in that war. One of the main reasons is because we don't really have that much of a base of operations (just S. Korea and the ocean). Also, we don't want to have to deal with the poverty that we'd have to help eliminate once new leadership takes over.


Posted by malek on Nov-21-2005 21:13:

quote:
Originally posted by Purple
US is shit scared of China


not really.

Chinese forces are very under-equipped and do not really pose a threat to US dominance.

Of course the US does not stand a chance of invading, but why would they.

On the other hand a full blown war between these two countries and US military advantage is clear.


Posted by Spartan on Nov-22-2005 05:53:

ok...

for starters there are so many chinese americans in the United States that a war w/ China would almost be like a civil war.

Purple, really kid. Grow up. You're only embarressing yourself w/ your posts and I'm surprised ppl are even responding to you.


Posted by JM on Nov-22-2005 05:58:

quote:
Originally posted by Trancer-X

In Los Angeles County, CA alone, there are around 100,000 homeless people on any given day.
[/color]


they need to get off the streets then, and get homes. then they won't be homeless again.

>JM<


Posted by Spartan on Nov-22-2005 06:02:

Re: Re: Which country will US attack next?

quote:
Originally posted by Purple
Thier are 193 countries, out of which 190 are left.

Which countries do you think will USA attack next?



quote:
Originally posted by Lepanto
one can hope it's wherever you are


hahaha +1, go home purple


Posted by SOLO on Nov-23-2005 01:23:

quote:
Originally posted by trancaholic
Mexico.

Seriously, don't you think that even the warmongers in the US have realized how ineffective wars are by now?



Mexico, that's funny....
I would be surprised to see that, it's hard enought to barely keep control of iraq with 26 million people, let alone 100+ million. plus the other half are living in US already


Posted by gabba420 on Nov-23-2005 03:54:

Venezuela is next. That president has made it clear he dont like the US and Mexico. He does not want free trade between countries. and I think there is oil there (not sure on that).


Posted by tonybologna on Nov-23-2005 16:10:

Actually at prices above $58 a barrel, extracting oil from the Alberta oil sands in Canada is now becoming more attractive. Thus, I believe the U.S. will attack Canada not only for its oil, but also other commodities such as softwood lumber.


Posted by Purple on Nov-23-2005 16:18:

I think its UK. He said you are with me or against me. And UK is slowly pulling out of mess it got into.


Posted by sensorium on Nov-23-2005 21:08:

quote:
Originally posted by gabba420
Venezuela is next. That president has made it clear he dont like the US and Mexico. He does not want free trade between countries. and I think there is oil there (not sure on that).


Oil is so plenty in Venezuela that Hugo Ch�vez drinks it on a daily basis.

But the US of A should just focus on this war.


Posted by Lover Boy on Nov-24-2005 00:39:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Which country will US attack next?

quote:
Originally posted by Purple
But silly, US think it owns the UN.


The US pays for over half the UN's budget, if I paid that i'd think I owned it


Posted by zookeeper on Nov-24-2005 05:45:

quote:
Originally posted by Spartan
there are so many chinese americans in the United States that a war w/ China would almost be like a civil war.



The Chinese Americans, that I know, would be the first people to pick up a weapon for a fight against China's communist government.

Plus...where would we get all of our cheap consumables, if we attacked China?


Posted by Lepanto on Nov-24-2005 05:57:

quote:
Originally posted by zookeeper
The Chinese Americans, that I know, would be the first people to pick up a weapon for a fight against China's communist government.

Plus...where would we get all of our cheap consumables, if we attacked China?


from a dozen other countries that are in line to do it.


Posted by zookeeper on Nov-24-2005 06:02:

quote:
Originally posted by Lepanto
from a dozen other countries that are in line to do it.




It's so nice to be wanted


Pages (6): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.