TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- In Search of Sunrise 4
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Rockabye ISOS 4 is a huge disappointement for all people who know ISOS 1-3. ISOS 1-3 were classics with OK mixing and fantastic tracks. The mixing of ISOS 4 is terrible and I don't understand why Tiesto didn't mix the cds for a second or third time until they sound better. I couldn't imagine Tiesto is pleased with his work? ![]() There are some really good tracks on ISOS 4 but because Tiesto choosed to mixed 2 CDs we have too many average ones. It would be better if he stuck to one cd with 14-15 tracks which are mixed well. Oh...yeah...we had so many ISOS 4 threads maybe you should just use the search function next time... |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by humilis About the release: good tracks..and.. Tiesto has done something very special as a trance DJ! He has found house, progressive house and techno ... |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by ThaMaestro Just leave MichaelBoogerd!. All the time he is (for good reason) really pissed at stupid people who like tiesto. all he likes is pissing on tiesto's clueless fanbase, which most definitely includes pissing on people who like things which are tiesto-related but can't express themselves clearly enough ... its a bit childish i think. guess he cant help it |
What has he been playing since 1995? Uplifting trance.
Some good tracks, overall pretty boring.
its one of my top CDs for the year. The Twelve remix is hott. It will remain a favorite for a long time.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by ClubGoddess its one of my top CDs for the year. |
i like ISOS 4, i didnt like it the first time i listened to it, coz the music was different and wasnt expected to be like that, but after listening to it few times more i actually started to enjoy it.
Tiesto makes too many different kind of styles, and i mean too many, they are all trance but they dont sound the same, and i think that tiesto does that because he tries to reach all kind of listeners and not just tiesto lovers, ive known some ppl that are not into the trance scene but they adore tracks produced by tiesto and only tiesto, and i never understood how he does that
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Rockabye I think you've listened to the wrong CDs this year |
and LOL @ ur avatar
| quote: |
| Originally posted by ArcticBeach its clearly (if you can read that is) that his not saying with tiesto as you mention ![]() usually you say that etc on the radio : that were Stronger with Britney Spears etc |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by thoughtlessjex I can read, but your post is unintelligable. Y'wanna know why MichaelBoogerd! got up in a tizzy about that tracklist? It really does imply that Tiesto produced a track with whomever is listed. And I've never heard the construction you give on the radio. Ever. What I have heard is, "That was Britney Spears with Stronger." |
hurrah... finally someone with common sense
ISOS 1 & 2 are brilliant
ISOS 3 & 4 are shit
Why do u think Tiesto put the Magik series to rest? because trance today is junk and he cant find tunes good enough for it...so he rested them instead of tarnishing the Magik series....i guess he figured he already fouled up ISOS with number 3 so why not make another CD of the ISOS series with crappy tunes....like he did. Even he knows the Magik is gone.
ISOS 4 could be a lot better if Tiesto would have only mixed 1 cd with 15 tracks or so and took the mixing a bit more serios...
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Rockabye ISOS 4 could be a lot better if Tiesto would have only mixed 1 cd with 15 tracks or so and took the mixing a bit more serios... |
The first 5 tracks or so on CD1 are brilliant. The mood really sets in and things flow really nicely. I wish he kept that feeling throughout, but not a bad mix in the end.
I think isos 4 is good, but the others are better and the mix is much better...
and imo, 2005:
asot2005 > isos 4 > tpod2...

| quote: |
| Originally posted by Rockabye ISOS 4 could be a lot better if Tiesto would have only mixed 1 cd with 15 tracks or so and took the mixing a bit more serios... |
he is capable of good mixing, why he doesn't do it, i don't know...
i think he intentionally likes to mix in a way, that is obvious that he is mixing in a track. sometimes what he does works EXCELLENTLY (hard to tell when one track ends, and the other finishes), other times, it comes off horrible.
Favourite tracks:
13. Loves We Lost, The - (with Allure)
14. Perfect Silene - (E-Craig's 212 remix, with Blank & Jones)
love the way their mixed, too^
Moments - (with Tone Depth/Soultan)
Only One - (Rave mix, with Sensorica/Jin Key)
Gravity - (with P.O.S.)
other great tracks:
Do What U Want - (Max Graham Afterhours in Montreal mix, with JASEfos/Claire Van Der Boom)
Palma Solane - (with Estuera/Re:Locate
Gravity 10 - (with Grayarea/Erik Shepard)
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Konijn word up. some good tunes here and there, but overall a lazy and hastily slapped-together comp. isos 1 prob. has the best tunes of the series, but it stops there and doesn't fully deliver on building the atmosphere it promises. isos 3, and especially 2, are wonderfully ordered and programmed. unless tijs can pare things down to a single cd of singular quality, isos should join the magik series in the retirement home. |
I think the decision to make 2 CDs also came from record company because you can better sale albums with 2 CDs than with one...
There are often differnet interests of the record company and the dj / producer but in the end the company mostly makes the last decision 
if you guys were able to ask tiesto a question about whatever you guys keep wondering with what he's doing with the music lately, what would the question be ?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by x_moe if you guys were able to ask tiesto a question about whatever you guys keep wondering with what he's doing with the music lately, what would the question be ? |
Ok, this is why I was disappointed with ISOS4:
1) Previous ISOS albums all started off so dreamy, ambient, and just something that I think really helped set the mood for the entire album. And that was what I was used to.
And what did ISOS4 start with? Like A Waterfall. ugh. granted, the song is all right - it shouldn't be used to start an ISOS album. Palma Solane i think was a better choice....but still a little too upbeat/"fast" for what normally started off the series.
2) The endings of all ISOS albums were EXPLOSIVE. Prime example: Airtight. I mean, this track is LOUD and ends on a final solid note. All the series ended on a solid one final note. It was a complete conclusion. a true real finale.
and what did ISOS4 end with? Only One [Rave Mix]. ugh. hardly explosive and it fucking fades out at the end!!!! WTF?! Why does a mix CD fade out!? this is something that happens on live albums [i.e. Universal Regligion 2004, etc...]. VERY disappointing.
3) Mixing. previous series were mixed a lot better. with ISOS4, it's not that the beats don't match up - or that you can hear double basslines overlapping horribly....but the mixing is done abruptly. the tracks change i think too fast. i.e tracks 1 to 2 on disc 2. wow.
Previous series were mixed a lot more smoother - and there were longer transitions between tracks. on ISOS2, going from track 13 to 14 , you can hear Airtight like 45 seconds before it even comes around. it's faint - but it builds up to when the track comes in full force. i just think that's amazing.
4) Overall tracks. this did not need to be a 2x CD. honestly, the best 14 or 15 tracks should have been combined into one - and have less "fluff" in between. And i personally hate thank Junkie XL remix of UR. ugh. awful.
Things I liked about ISOS4:
1) Palma Solane. granted, it's not the best starting track, it's still amazing. this i think could have been an amazing ending. one of my fav tracks.
2) Perfect Silence. here we go - this is how an ISOS series should end. fantastic ending. one of my favorite tracks of all time.
3) other tracks: Arcadia, The Loves we Lost, La Noche, Why, Bad [although perhaps not appropriate for an ISOS feel], Netherworld, and Sands of Time & Evolution. But really, these tracks should have just been on ONE album, and not spread about two.
This is just what i think. maybe faster and abrubter mixing is preferred by others. maybe people like the more upbeat feel and the more aggressive intros. but to me, it just doesn't really seem like a TRUE ISOS album.
You are damn right Tubularbills.
The main problem of ISOS 4 is that it is compared to 1-3. They should gave it a different name.
ISOS 1-3 had such great moods and really were a dreamy journey through beautiful sounds.
They had a feeling of chilling at a sunny beach.
There are too many tracks in ISOS 4 that doesn't cover this mood and doesn't wake this feelings.
I couldn't "dive" into the music like I could in ISOS 1-3 because of the transitions. They are too short and not smooth enough. And of course that there are many beat-matching errors doesn't make it better 
overall shit cd i thought...very boring...i liked grayarea - gravity though
I enjoyed both CDS, maybe I should give it a re-listen maybe. But from what I can remember, I wasn't disappointed.
I've also enjoyed his other ISOS complications too.
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.