TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- how many of you write down the BPMs on the covers of your vinyl
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
| quote: |
| Originally posted by SpecRadio The BPM is not what you mix by! I've had mixes in traktor 3 where one is 138.9 and one is 139.4 and they're matched perfectly. |
Well you can mix a track @ 130 bpm with one that has 138-140 bpm and it CAN sound good.
If you pitch a track +6 it will change its key (-6 does the same) and you can mix it with a track that has a higher BPM. Of course it will sound a bit smoother if you pitch track A +3 and track B -3.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Rockabye Well you can mix a track @ 130 bpm with one that has 138-140 bpm and it CAN sound good. If you pitch a track +6 it will change its key (-6 does the same) and you can mix it with a track that has a higher BPM. Of course it will sound a bit smoother if you pitch track A +3 and track B -3. |
i never write anything down.
i too dislike to see writing on my sleeves, or vinyl label itself. i find it very disrespectful for some reason...
the difference in tempos is the reason why i purchased a pair of m5g's. as much as don't like mixing in the +-16 mode, i like it a lot more than fiddling the track that is playing in order to be able to beatmatch the next track.
my aversion to messing w/the tempo of the track that is playing is my main reason for not giving a hoot about harmonic mixing.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Nic How are you supposed to mix in key without knowing the bpm of tracks? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Tranc3 I listen to it... |
Re: how many of you write down the BPMs on the covers of your vinyl
| quote: |
| Originally posted by hiram im learning to spin so im still counting beats for both records and then matching them, i count for 15 sec and then multiply by 4. just wondering how many of your pre-count the BPMs and write them down on the record or the cover for quicker mixing. |
I only use the bpm counter as a generalisation, not for acurate mixing. Like if the track Im playing is 129, Ill cue up the next track and pitch it up/down to 129 and then go from there. I dont think it was ever meant to replace beatmatching.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Nic cool so you have all 499500 combinations memorised then? |
i've thought about putting the bpm and key on there, but i don't have the hardware to do it (and i'm not going to tap the spacebar to the beat either!). maybe when i start converting my vinyl to CD/mp3.
couldn't hurt! but yeah, i don't recommend it for newb DJs who have to train their ears first....
edit: don't live by it, cuz there are some tracks that can sound a lot better at around +6 (depending on the mix)
I only use the bpm counter to check the speed of the first track.
How the hell do you figure out the key? I've never understood how you tell.
I'm guessing that when two tracks clash that means they're way out of key?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Tranc3 Let me see if I'm understanding your question correctly. Each track is written in a certain key. Say I have the live track playing in C Major and the cued track in natural A below C major. Either the live track has to be pitched down or the cued track pitched up to both be in the same key...or depending on the chord progressions used, you could just use other keys that will create the desired cadence. Is this what you're getting at? Because if so, no I don't have X amount of combinations memorized. The whole point of just listening to it is so I don't have to carry out calculations, so I don't have to memorize tables. Just listen to it, it's not that hard. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DJ_LG I only use the bpm counter to check the speed of the first track. How the hell do you figure out the key? I've never understood how you tell. I'm guessing that when two tracks clash that means they're way out of key? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Nic You use your keyboard/piano |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Nic With 1000 records there are 499500 combinations of mixing 1 record with another record out of that 1000. My point was that its close to impossible to remember if every single record in your collection mixes with every single other record. Harmonic mixing allows you to mix without memorising every combination of records. Mixing 2 tracks that are in key or are in similar keys almost always works, in order to harmonically mix you need the key AND the bpm of the track. There are no tables or anything to memorise, and there are no calculations to do, if you dont understand read the harmonic mixing thread. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by SpecRadio The BPM is not what you mix by! I've had mixes in traktor 3 where one is 138.9 and one is 139.4 and they're matched perfectly. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Tranc3 I read the first hundred posts or so, and my understanding of it seems to be spot on. Why would you need the bpm of the track in the first place? If the two tunes are off key, you'll be able to hear it, simple as that. Just as a decent DJ can hear when beats are off, a decent music theorist can hear when two sounds are consonant or dissonant. When I said I have my records memorized, I don't mean I have all the combinations memorized, I mean exactly what it says - I have my records memorized. I can recall any record in my collection and play it back in my head. When the live track is playing, as I go through my records, I subconsciously play each one back and figure out which ones will be harmonically consonant and which ones will be harmonically dissonant, and choose one, depending on the type of music that's playing. And yes, I can pitch them up or down one semitone at a time...in my head. How is that not easier than going through all your records, keying each one beforehand, and then remembering the pitch percentage differential to semitone conversion? Just listen to it, and if you know what to listen for, you'll be fine. |

| quote: |
| Originally posted by hiram being that im not musicaly inclined in any way i dont own a piano or keyboard. would i have to take a keyboarding class or start lessons to know the keys? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Tranc3 I can recall any record in my collection and play it back in my head. When the live track is playing, as I go through my records, I subconsciously play each one back and figure out which ones will be harmonically consonant and which ones will be harmonically dissonant, and choose one, depending on the type of music that's playing. And yes, I can pitch them up or down one semitone at a time...in my head. How is that not easier than going through all your records, keying each one beforehand, and then remembering the pitch percentage differential to semitone conversion? Just listen to it, and if you know what to listen for, you'll be fine. |
Damn, no need to resort to thinly disguised ad hominem attacks. Yes, I have all my records memorized. Yes, I can pitch them up or down. This does not seem like a big deal to me, I've been able to do it all my life. Just as the person born with faulty nerves doesn't think it's particularly special that he or she can put his or her hand in a fire and not feel anything, I listen to sounds and memorize them.
I'm not saying writing down information is lame, I'm just pointing out my method takes less effort on my part, and figured I'd share it. However, having never talked about harmonic mixing to another DJ, I've never thought of it as anything special, and still don't. Apparently what I do is not practiced widely. How that translates to my being an incredible DJ is beyond me, sounds like faulty reasoning really, but then again, as stated before, you are resorting to ad hominem attacks, and for no discernible reason.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Tranc3 And writing down the bpm for categorization purposes is a lame excuse if I've ever heard one |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Tranc3 I'm not saying writing down information is lame |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Tranc3 Damn, no need to resort to thinly disguised ad hominem attacks. Yes, I have all my records memorized. Yes, I can pitch them up or down. This does not seem like a big deal to me, I've been able to do it all my life. Just as the person born with faulty nerves doesn't think it's particularly special that he or she can put his or her hand in a fire and not feel anything, I listen to sounds and memorize them. I'm not saying writing down information is lame, I'm just pointing out my method takes less effort on my part, and figured I'd share it. However, having never talked about harmonic mixing to another DJ, I've never thought of it as anything special, and still don't. Apparently what I do is not practiced widely. How that translates to my being an incredible DJ is beyond me, sounds like faulty reasoning really, but then again, as stated before, you are resorting to ad hominem attacks, and for no discernible reason. |
No, never..
I always try to get a set together before I play out though.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Cutz No, never.. I always try to get a set together before I play out though. |
ah just count it in your head and look at the watch for 10 seconds then multiply. Simplified. You don't need to write down your beats. You never ever want to put bpm numbers.. always leave it in your head. Don't be lazy lol..
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.