TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Montreal
-- The Super Bowl Thread
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »


Posted by ninjahola on Jan-20-2006 22:39:

quote:
Originally posted by Epicurus


Oh, and ninja:



hehehe




sorry can't resist this has gotten addictive


Posted by Epicurus on Jan-20-2006 22:45:

quote:
Originally posted by ninjahola
hehehe




sorry can't resist this has gotten addictive


I noticed. There was no way you could have actually read my post and posted your smiley. You were faster than lightning


Posted by ninjahola on Jan-20-2006 22:45:

quote:
Originally posted by Epicurus
I noticed. There was no way you could have actually read my post and posted your smiley


No I did and

Go Broncos

Ninja ninja ninja


Posted by Epicurus on Jan-20-2006 22:46:

quote:
Originally posted by ninjahola
No I did and

Go Broncos


See you did it again. Half my post in your quote is missing


Posted by ninjahola on Jan-20-2006 22:48:

quote:
Originally posted by Epicurus
See you did it again. Half my post in your quote is missing


NO you are faster than lighting seee i can do it too


Posted by all-nite-freak on Jan-20-2006 22:49:

You are only as good as you are lucky.The Pats had some luck on route to their Superbowl victories.A team this far along is never shite.
Save the drama for your mama...
I think you could use getting lucky Nick....
Your typing skills prove youve been using your wrists too much.
That is not Halal


Posted by Epicurus on Jan-20-2006 22:54:

quote:
Originally posted by ninjahola
NO you are faster than lighting seee i can do it too



Damn you and your terroristic edits.


Posted by ninjahola on Jan-20-2006 22:55:

quote:
Originally posted by Epicurus
Damn you and your terroristic edits.




cheers nick!


Posted by Epicurus on Jan-20-2006 23:03:

quote:
Originally posted by all-nite-freak
You are only as good as you are lucky.


And your reply is as convincing as your played-out maxim. I expect a detailed rebuttal to my post, not some Confucian wannabee saying along the lines of fortune cookies

quote:
Originally posted by all-nite-freak
I think you could use getting lucky Nick....
Your typing skills prove youve been using your wrists too much.
That is not Halal


I don't need to get lucky. I'm hot, sexy and spicy. That usually does the trick. If you don't believe me, ask aria-clubber.


Posted by all-nite-freak on Jan-20-2006 23:09:


detailed reply:
I eat more pussy than cervical cancer ask Yogi the bear

what things getting spicy between you and aria clubber....
u a lebanese member of NAMBLA


Posted by Epicurus on Jan-20-2006 23:16:

quote:
Originally posted by all-nite-freak

detailed reply:


I'll take that as abdication on your part.

quote:
Originally posted by all-nite-freak
what things getting spicy between you and aria clubber....
u a lebanese member of NAMBLA


I'm glad that dead-pan humour is lost on you. I can simply sit back and pretend like I'm offended


Posted by PaulCky411 on Jan-21-2006 00:30:

quote:
Originally posted by Epicurus
Jay's in left field again (as per his usual)

The Broncos? THE BRONCOS? THE BRONCOS ????!!

Have you watched any games this season???? Have you watched the playoffs at all???? Where are you getting your disinformation from??? And can I bet my house against any of you picks???

I don't know where to begin. But let's start with the following points:

1-) Home field advantage: Yes, the Broncos are 9-0 at home (though they got lucky against the Patriots -- see below), but the Steelers are 8-2 on the road (as opposed to 5-3 at home). This is a veteran team that doesn't get rattled by home field advantage or the "noise factor" or whatever else you want to throw at them, as witnessed by their destruction of a superior and almost "unbeatable" team at Indianapolis (who was 7-1 before their shallacking).

2-) Broncos/Pats game: If you actually watched the Broncos/Pats game, you would have concluded that the Broncos were EXTREMELY lucky to get out of there with a win. I don't think I've ever seen a worse game played by a Tom Brady-led offense and a more opportunistic (in a lucky sort of way) defense. Five turnovers were committed by the Patriots. FIVE!!! Not to mention the back-breaking type of turnovers that reverse the momentum of the game. How often does that happen to a veteran-tested team??? How often is Champ Bailey going to return an interception for 100 yards, when an opposing team has the Broncos on the ropes by driving them right to their goal line (not to mention that it should have been called a touchback). How often can you count on 5 turnovers to win the game??? Because clearly, the Broncos would have lost that game otherwise.

The Steelers have committed a total of 20 turnovers in 18 games. That's about 1 a game. From a statistical point of view, lightning won't strike twice with another playoff-tested team, especially one like the Steelers who take care of the ball. And without turnovers, there is now way the Broncos win against the Patriots, let alone the Steelers.

3-) Coaching: Mike Shanahan is the most overrated coach in the history of the NFL (after Marty Shottenheimer). Yes, he "won" 2 super bowls, but I use the term "won" very loosely, since he had almost nothing to do with the wins. Without Elway and Davis, he wouldn't have won a thing, as witnessed by his zero playoff wins since 1998, until he got lucky with the Pats. That's ONE playoff victory since then. And a fluke at that. And even then, Bill Belicheck was eating him alive with the matchups. He looked like a dear caught in the headlights everytime the camera focused on him when the Patriots were driving it down their throats. The Mike Shanahan face is to die for. You'll be seeing a lot of that this weekend.

Bill Cowher on the other hand, though not as good as Belicheck, is a fucking solid coach. He's taken Pittsburgh to the playoffs 10 out of 14 years since he's been here, including one trip to the Super Bowl, with average talent. He came up with a master plan against the "unbeatable" Indy squad at home that made them eat their socks. His only dumb call was trying to rush Bettis at the end, instead of asking Ben to take a knee at the 2 yard line (although who would have guessed that Bettis, who hadn't fumbled all year would fumble then). Otherwise, the entire plan was brilliant.

Not to mention that Dick Lebeau is the best defensive coordinator since Buddy Ryan back in his Philly days. The guy is a defensive genius and a master at disguising coverages, not to mention a blitz master extraordinaire. If Peyton Manning had problems throwing the ball against them, you think Jake will fare any better????? Jake the snake???? HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Which brings me to:

4-) Quarterbacks: Ben versus Jake. Should be a no-brainer. Roethlisberger is a rock back there, with the poise of a 12 year veteran. So smooth, so confident, very rarely makes bad decisions with the football. Can you even trust Jake??? I mean seriously. Would you want to have him back there trying to lead your team from 7 points down??? Can you count of him not turning all Jekyl and Hyde on you and reverting back to Jake the Snake of his first 10 years in the league, forcing passes into coverage or rolling out on bootlegs and getting smashed in the face by linebackers? Imagine Joey Porter getting a free shot at Jake. He'd rip his helmet off, shave his beard, stuff his facial hair down his panties and give him an atomic wedgy. Jake is not to be trusted. NEVER!

I could go on and on, but this is getting long and I think you get my point. Personally, I don't even think this one is going to be close. I say Steelers by at least 7. And then, onto the SuperBowl where they'll either clobber Seattle or win a close one against the Panthers.

STEELERS BABY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Finally someone with some football knowledge posts something!

I just don't know if the steelers will be able to pull it off against either NFC team... it's possible against Seattle as you said, Panthers will be tough, but I could also care less if they do, as long as the Broncos lose, hahaha


Posted by jester on Jan-22-2006 21:41:

Steelers right now in the lead over the Broncos at half time.


Posted by tonybologna on Jan-22-2006 22:43:

Here we go...Steelers...here we go


Posted by PaulCky411 on Jan-22-2006 23:13:

HAHAHAHA

BRONCOS SUCK!!!

all i can say is... TOLD YA!!!

never question my sports knowledge


Posted by jester on Jan-22-2006 23:14:

Steelers #1


Posted by Epicurus on Jan-22-2006 23:16:

quote:
Originally posted by Epicurus
Jay's in left field again (as per his usual)

The Broncos? THE BRONCOS? THE BRONCOS ????!!

Have you watched any games this season???? Have you watched the playoffs at all???? Where are you getting your disinformation from??? And can I bet my house against any of you picks???

I don't know where to begin. But let's start with the following points:

1-) Home field advantage: Yes, the Broncos are 9-0 at home (though they got lucky against the Patriots -- see below), but the Steelers are 8-2 on the road (as opposed to 5-3 at home). This is a veteran team that doesn't get rattled by home field advantage or the "noise factor" or whatever else you want to throw at them, as witnessed by their destruction of a superior and almost "unbeatable" team at Indianapolis (who was 7-1 before their shallacking).

2-) Broncos/Pats game: If you actually watched the Broncos/Pats game, you would have concluded that the Broncos were EXTREMELY lucky to get out of there with a win. I don't think I've ever seen a worse game played by a Tom Brady-led offense and a more opportunistic (in a lucky sort of way) defense. Five turnovers were committed by the Patriots. FIVE!!! Not to mention the back-breaking type of turnovers that reverse the momentum of the game. How often does that happen to a veteran-tested team??? How often is Champ Bailey going to return an interception for 100 yards, when an opposing team has the Broncos on the ropes by driving them right to their goal line (not to mention that it should have been called a touchback). How often can you count on 5 turnovers to win the game??? Because clearly, the Broncos would have lost that game otherwise.

The Steelers have committed a total of 20 turnovers in 18 games. That's about 1 a game. From a statistical point of view, lightning won't strike twice with another playoff-tested team, especially one like the Steelers who take care of the ball. And without turnovers, there is now way the Broncos win against the Patriots, let alone the Steelers.

3-) Coaching: Mike Shanahan is the most overrated coach in the history of the NFL (after Marty Shottenheimer). Yes, he "won" 2 super bowls, but I use the term "won" very loosely, since he had almost nothing to do with the wins. Without Elway and Davis, he wouldn't have won a thing, as witnessed by his zero playoff wins since 1998, until he got lucky with the Pats. That's ONE playoff victory since then. And a fluke at that. And even then, Bill Belicheck was eating him alive with the matchups. He looked like a dear caught in the headlights everytime the camera focused on him when the Patriots were driving it down their throats. The Mike Shanahan face is to die for. You'll be seeing a lot of that this weekend.

Bill Cowher on the other hand, though not as good as Belicheck, is a fucking solid coach. He's taken Pittsburgh to the playoffs 10 out of 14 years since he's been here, including one trip to the Super Bowl, with average talent. He came up with a master plan against the "unbeatable" Indy squad at home that made them eat their socks. His only dumb call was trying to rush Bettis at the end, instead of asking Ben to take a knee at the 2 yard line (although who would have guessed that Bettis, who hadn't fumbled all year would fumble then). Otherwise, the entire plan was brilliant.

Not to mention that Dick Lebeau is the best defensive coordinator since Buddy Ryan back in his Philly days. The guy is a defensive genius and a master at disguising coverages, not to mention a blitz master extraordinaire. If Peyton Manning had problems throwing the ball against them, you think Jake will fare any better????? Jake the snake???? HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Which brings me to:

4-) Quarterbacks: Ben versus Jake. Should be a no-brainer. Roethlisberger is a rock back there, with the poise of a 12 year veteran. So smooth, so confident, very rarely makes bad decisions with the football. Can you even trust Jake??? I mean seriously. Would you want to have him back there trying to lead your team from 7 points down??? Can you count of him not turning all Jekyl and Hyde on you and reverting back to Jake the Snake of his first 10 years in the league, forcing passes into coverage or rolling out on bootlegs and getting smashed in the face by linebackers? Imagine Joey Porter getting a free shot at Jake. He'd rip his helmet off, shave his beard, stuff his facial hair down his panties and give him an atomic wedgy. Jake is not to be trusted. NEVER!

I could go on and on, but this is getting long and I think you get my point. Personally, I don't even think this one is going to be close. I say Steelers by at least 7. And then, onto the SuperBowl where they'll either clobber Seattle or win a close one against the Panthers.

STEELERS BABY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


1-) Check. Home field advantage wasn't going to rattle the Steelers.
2-) Check. Steelers: 0 turnovers => Broncos lose. Game wasn't even close.
3-) Check. Brilliant game plan by the Steelers' coaches. Did anyone catch the Mike Shanahan face?
4-) Check. Ben: like a rock: Sublime performance. Jake: like a snake: 2 INT, 2 fumbles.

Game wasn't close, as predicted. Steelers in the Super Bowl, as predicted. Should I start gloating now or later?


Posted by PaulCky411 on Jan-22-2006 23:35:

quote:
Originally posted by Epicurus
Game wasn't close, as predicted. Steelers in the Super Bowl, as predicted. Should I start gloating now or later?


now works for me, just because all the bronco fans that were on here, hahaha


Posted by LiGHT78 on Jan-23-2006 01:50:

DOWN WITH THE STEELERS

I hope they lose hard in the godamn Bowl, I hate them.

Seahawks ripping into Carolina in the early going surprisingly!

Seahawks - Steelers would be interesting to say the least.


Posted by aria_clubber on Jan-23-2006 02:30:

quote:
Originally posted by all-nite-freak

what things getting spicy between you and aria clubber....
u a lebanese member of NAMBLA


WHAT THE FUCK IS DA PROBLEM ??!??!!!!!?!??!?!
what spicy things u talkin about ? WTF and FTW


Posted by PaulCky411 on Jan-23-2006 07:20:

quote:
Originally posted by LiGHT78
DOWN WITH THE STEELERS

I hope they lose hard in the godamn Bowl, I hate them.

Seahawks ripping into Carolina in the early going surprisingly!

Seahawks - Steelers would be interesting to say the least.



interesting, agreed... i hope seattle kills em now that the steelers are actually in the bowl... i hate them too but i just wanted them to beat denver because they didnt deserve to get to the superbowl


Posted by TheVrk on Jan-23-2006 09:17:

Think Pittsburgh will beat Seattle, 31-20


Posted by all-nite-freak on Jan-23-2006 15:52:

Wow was i ever wrong...Broncos and Panthers looked like Pop Warner temas.Pit will win the bowl no matter how much I hate them
Nick looks like your E-Peanor tm is bigger...too bad its not real life


Posted by DigDeep on Jan-24-2006 18:58:

Seattle WILL win.... it's just a matter of by how many.

I cant believe the Steelers are favoured by 4!?


Posted by LiGHT78 on Jan-24-2006 19:06:

Steelers are gonna be the favorite just cuz they're the Steelers and everyone wants Bettis to have the storybook ending to his career.

Personally, I see the Seahawks ripping them hard! Everyone said Carolina would shut down Alexander and the Seattle offense...so they come out and drop 34 points on yo bitch asses! I wanna see Bettis lying down on the field in tears at the end of the game and Cowher standing there in disbelief after the Seahawks have torched their asses.


Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.