TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Sports Discussion
-- Super Bowl XL - Who is going to win???
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Ok today, I bet on the Steelers..I thought about everything and I put the money on them!
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Rockabye I think the Steelers will win. They defeated the Bengals, Colts and Broncos and have the momentum on their side. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by JM i bitchslap all you picking the Steelers. seriously though, the Seahawks have gotten no respect from anyone, especially that one gay ESPN.com editor. Steelers, a #6 seed. How in the fuck did they end up in the superbowl anyways? What happened to the Colts? Anyways...the Hawks have a complete team. And you will see, after they win the superbowl, people will again be coming up with excuses, ah the Steelers were hurt, injured, tired (they didnt have two weeks off ) and other bs... We've heard it all before.All i gotta say is that i'm getting ready to watch the Superbowl, and heading out to REI to buy that rain parka to prepare for the big parade that will take place in rain Downtown Seattle the following Tuesday. PS. Alexander will rush for another 100+ yards, and score 2+ TD's against the steelers. And bettis is old, but he will retire losing the superbowl. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by gouuryella Ok today, I bet on the Steelers..I thought about everything and I put the money on them! |
i think this will be the best super bowl since the pats-rams super bowl . i think we will see many surprises.
i pick the steelers. destiny has led them to the super bowl. quite frankly, they wouldn't be in the super bowl right now, if it wasn't for chicken broth's (his new name -- ben roethlisberger. i don't want to spell out his whole name. so i will call him chicken broth . hahaha) tackle against the colts. if he didn't make that tackle, indy would have stolen that game, and bettis would have retired with that knowledge he blew the game for the steelers.
but the steelers are in the super bowl. the seahawks are a different story. seem to love shutting people up, saying they can match up with the elite. they proved they can win without alexander against the skins, and also proved they have a pretty solid defense against the panthers. but guess what ? the "12th man" will not be there @ detroit, so things may be a little different.
steelers - seahawks ! let's get it on !!!
i will foresee my M.V.P. pick. My pick will be Heath Miller, the tight end for the Steelers, because he will score 3 touchdowns. 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by getfoul What about having the league high of 50 sacks? What about sending 7 players to the probowl. Including a rookie. What about the seahawks having the best (second best? It's one of the two) redzone defense in the NFL. "During the regular season, they allowed only 3.6 yards per rush, a mere five rushing TDs, only six runs longer than 20 yards, and a single 100-yard rusher (Tiki Barber of the Giants, who did that to a lot of defenses)." You don't hear about any standout receivers and huge playmakers from the seahawks, making you think they don't have that explosive of an offense. That's because when most QB's will throw to one guy the most "Cough/ Steve Smith /cough" Matt is busy throwing to 9 guys in one playoff game. INCLUDING the backup QB! |
Battle tested or worn out by the time the Super Bowl comes around from playing 3 straight games on the road against the top 3 seeds? Hmmmm......
regardless, I don't see pitts winning. They won in denver from a poor performance by plummer. They won in Indy on pure luck that ben was able to make that tackle.
I don't think it will be a very close game, and the pitts offense will have a hard time rushing the ball. And thy will have a hard time stopping the variety that the hawks are able to put up in regards to receivers.
Superbowl = Neutral territory. Homefield and visitors advantages both apply.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by LeopoldStotch i will foresee my M.V.P. pick. My pick will be Heath Miller, the tight end for the Steelers, because he will score 3 touchdowns. |

| quote: |
| Originally posted by LeopoldStotch i pick the steelers. destiny has led them to the super bowl. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Mebot What's with the "destiny" bullshit? i hear the analysts on SportsCenter, PTI, Around the Horn, etc keep referring to the Steelers run as "destiny" why? and please spare me the rattling excuse of "the first #6 team to go all the way in the playoffs" that's not destiny. |
A lot of things are just not right with this super bowl. English rock stars performing in the town of techno and motown? Notable "veteran" Tom Brady flipping the coin?
tis chicken broth, ye proclaim correctly sir!
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Mebot A lot of things are just not right with this super bowl. English rock stars performing in the town of techno and motown? Notable "veteran" Tom Brady flipping the coin? tis chicken broth, ye proclaim correctly sir! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by getfoul Superbowl = Neutral territory. Homefield and visitors advantages both apply. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by getfoul Superbowl = Neutral territory. Homefield and visitors advantages both apply. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Nou Remember the Hawks are used to noise, Qwest field is the loudest stadium in the league and the Hawks are undefeated at home. |
Kick off in a couple of hours!
pre-game show was a monkey fest.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Spartan for some reason i think Detroit is going to be overflowing with Steelers fans. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Nou Remember the Hawks are used to noise, Qwest field is the loudest stadium in the league and the Hawks are undefeated at home. |
You should take a look at the other super bowl topic "so I watched the super bowl" where stupid soccer fanatics wanna tell me that american football is much more simple than soccer 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Nou But two bullshit calls decided that game, and they were obviously crap calls. The offensive interference in the first half was bullshit, not only was it not an interference but that is one of the stupidest calls in football. Second was the blocking call in the 4th, wtf, even John Madden was like "I didn't see any blocking!" Third, and its debatable, the TD before the half from every angle looked like it never went in. I will put this up as the worst called game, and to prove I am not biased because its my team, we should have gotten called on that fumble earlier, but they didn't. |
(He used to shove off like crazy)
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Nou Yea, that TD call was close, but it dosnt matter, the call that kills me is the fucking holding call on Seattle in the 4th that could have turned the tide. They showed like 3 replays and there wasnt a holding ANYWHERE! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Nou Yea, but you can also not make crappy calls that have no merit like the Hasselback fumble that was overturned. He was grabbed and he was down... and they still called it. |
guess what guys 
i won my bet!!! wooo hooo

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.