TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- New Winamp 5.2 x86
Pages (2): « 1 [2]


Posted by Illuminati on Feb-26-2006 11:16:

quote:
Originally posted by Nayil
i use WMP .... sounds more atmospheric when i use my bose headphones. The bass really kicks in


Well, just adjust the equalizer in winamp! Problem solved!
You can use the present �laptop speakers / headphones� or adjust the eq manually.


Posted by DJ Cinos on Feb-26-2006 11:26:

foobaaaaaaarrr!

Better sound, quicker, nicer. ftw!

...and Apollo for mp3s.


Posted by skip on Feb-26-2006 14:40:

one of the best things in winamp IMO is the ability to enqueue tracks from the playlist to be played next. does foobar or apollo offer this?


Posted by mentalbarter on Feb-26-2006 14:43:

quote:
Originally posted by _Nut_
I do think that in many years... this is the first smile ive seen from you.



Posted by Mr.Mystery on Feb-26-2006 15:22:

quote:
Originally posted by _Nut_
I do think that in many years... this is the first smile ive seen from you.

It's adorable you've kept track of my postings, but I guess you just missed about 50% of them.


Posted by Purple on Feb-26-2006 15:51:

quote:
Originally posted by skip
one of the best things in winamp IMO is the ability to enqueue tracks from the playlist to be played next. does foobar or apollo offer this?


No for Apollo. Dont know about Foobar.

But the output sound quality in Apollo is much better than what you get from Winamp.


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Feb-26-2006 15:58:

quote:
Originally posted by Purple
But the output sound quality in Apollo is much better than what you get from Winamp.

Better how, exactly?


Posted by Purple on Feb-26-2006 16:05:

quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
Better how, exactly?


You see Winamp is generalised as a software which plays all file formats like wav, mpeg etc... so it plays same quality for all.

But Apollo is 'optimised' for playing only mp3 tracks, so the user end sound quality is much better than what I used to get from winamp.

You will realise that Apollo sounds much better once you download and listen to same track played in winamp and than apollo.

For more info in better english you can check the thread mentioned in first post of second page of this thread.


Posted by DJ Legs on Feb-26-2006 16:45:


WTH IS THIS?!?!?!??!?!!

<3<3<3<3<3 NOTHING


Posted by rockster77 on Feb-26-2006 16:54:

quote:
Less than a month after releasing a security update to Winamp, Nullsoft has delivered a new version of the media player to plug serious bugs. Winamp 5.2, issued Thursday, tackles a vulnerability in the software's handling of m3u playlist files, according to a developer posting on an online forum from Nullsoft, a division of America Online.

An attacker could put together a specially crafted m3u playlist to cause the computer to crash when the user pauses or stops play, according to an advisory from Secunia. It may also allow an intruder to execute code. The "highly critical" flaw affects the most recent versions of Winamp, versions 5.12 and 5.13, the security company said.


http://news.com.com/Winamp+update+f...ml?tag=nefd.hed


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Feb-26-2006 16:58:

quote:
Originally posted by Purple
You see Winamp is generalised as a software which plays all file formats like wav, mpeg etc... so it plays same quality for all.

But Apollo is 'optimised' for playing only mp3 tracks, so the user end sound quality is much better than what I used to get from winamp.

You will realise that Apollo sounds much better once you download and listen to same track played in winamp and than apollo.

For more info in better english you can check the thread mentioned in first post of second page of this thread.

No, what I mean is what do you mean by "better sound quality" exactly? What I want from a player is to be able to play the original track as close to the original sound quality as that, and when I play CD's with WinAmp it sounds exactly the same as playing the CD's in a CD player... so if the player alters the sound somehow that's not what I want.


Posted by Purple on Feb-26-2006 17:10:

quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
No, what I mean is what do you mean by "better sound quality" exactly? What I want from a player is to be able to play the original track as close to the original sound quality as that, and when I play CD's with WinAmp it sounds exactly the same as playing the CD's in a CD player... so if the player alters the sound somehow that's not what I want.


Well when I am playing an mp3 file on Apollo, its much more clearer and crisp, bass comes out much more clearer than in Winamp. In winamp the same track sounds like being played underwater or in a close room or something.


Posted by OrZonE on Feb-26-2006 18:39:

quote:
Originally posted by Purple
In winamp the same track sounds like being played underwater or in a close room or something.


You must have really messed up your winamp in that case.


Posted by warmregards on Feb-27-2006 02:13:

Winamp 2 son!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Posted by RapidFire on Feb-27-2006 02:21:

n00bs. Itunes ruuuules all!


Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.