TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Mode Hookers - Breathe/Instrumental
Pages (2): « 1 [2]


Posted by iammesol on Mar-14-2006 01:59:

differences discovered and accepted!!! I love diplomacy


Posted by GuvLuuver on Mar-14-2006 02:23:

yea... i never understood why they named it the "instramental" mix of Breathe, when it doesnt sound like the vocal mix.. they shoulda names it different...

and the instramental version is good... but i think its getting overplayed... anyway, its been around for awhile... time to get on with it


Posted by Allied Nations on Mar-14-2006 03:18:

quote:
Originally posted by GuvLuuver
yea... i never understood why they named it the "instramental" mix of Breathe, when it doesnt sound like the vocal mix.. they shoulda names it different...

and the instramental version is good... but i think its getting overplayed... anyway, its been around for awhile... time to get on with it


DUDE. Did you read the thread?! They are two separate tracks!


Posted by GuvLuuver on Mar-16-2006 00:17:

quote:
Originally posted by Allied Nations
DUDE. Did you read the thread?! They are two separate tracks!



yes i did read the thread. thats y i responded. i understand they are two different tracks. but why would u name something an "instramental" version (i.e. no vocals, Much like a "dub" mix) when it doesnt even have the same beat. I just mentioned that they should have given it a totally different name, to eliminate all the confusion.


Posted by iammesol on Mar-16-2006 02:03:

The only confusion is generated by people who are too retarded to accept the names for what they are




(or idiots like Armin)


Posted by JasonThomas on Mar-16-2006 06:10:

quote:
Originally posted by GuvLuuver
yes i did read the thread. thats y i responded. i understand they are two different tracks. but why would u name something an "instramental" version (i.e. no vocals, Much like a "dub" mix) when it doesnt even have the same beat. I just mentioned that they should have given it a totally different name, to eliminate all the confusion.


lol, read it again.


Posted by Munchy on Mar-16-2006 06:38:

quote:
Originally posted by GuvLuuver
yes i did read the thread. thats y i responded. i understand they are two different tracks. but why would u name something an "instramental" version (i.e. no vocals, Much like a "dub" mix) when it doesnt even have the same beat. I just mentioned that they should have given it a totally different name, to eliminate all the confusion.


For the last time:

There is a song called BREATHE and there is a song called INSTRUMENTAL, they are two completely different tracks, one is not an instrumental of the other, there are no vocals in either track.


Posted by Munchy on Mar-16-2006 06:38:

quote:
Originally posted by iammesol
The only confusion is generated by people who are too retarded to accept the names for what they are




(or idiots like Armin)


I'm gonna say it again, Eric Prydz bald = FUGLY.


Posted by iammesol on Mar-17-2006 04:44:

"Theres a reason why he wears toboggans so much" - Me


Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.