TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- what constitutes underground trance
Pages (2): « 1 [2]


Posted by flavdave on Apr-11-2006 19:08:

quote:
Originally posted by Demoted
Whereas with rock music there is not much to listen to. Only the Rolling Stones and Aerosmith. All forms of rock after this have yielded little to no production, and electronic music is the only form of music where there is a variety and vast amount of. The only.


You aren't making a good enough effort if you think good rock music pretty much ended after the Rolling Stones and Aerosmith.


Posted by nefardec on Apr-11-2006 20:11:

Also, let's not forget that underground is very relative to the community in general, as in the location:

I'm from Cleveland, Ohio, where Paul van Dyk would be considered underground WAY BEFORE he would be in Germany, where he would not be considered nearly underground.


Posted by Aquarian on Apr-11-2006 20:40:

quote:
Originally posted by stevieboy32808
Underground is a measure of popularity just like the term pop[ular] music is. Whether it'd be in the EDM world, rnb, country, or any other music genre it is simply a status used to classify music which hasn't been heard by the masses yet. For example trance in Europe is commonplace so it's not considered underground nor is it pop either. If you were to spit out some trance artist names to your average top 40 listener in the United States chances are those artists would render underground to them because they have never heard of them.


I agree with this. I don't know how bad it is in europe, but I wouldn't hasitate to call armin or tiesto underground. Of course there are different levels of popularity. But by far the majority haven't heard of these names in their lifetimes. Even in a party city like montreal, trance practically doesn't exist. So that considered, all trance is underground here. Except maybe DJ Sammy - if you want to call that trance.


Posted by ArgentinaHouse on Apr-15-2006 19:36:

trance and underground dont go hand in hand anymore.


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Apr-15-2006 19:49:

quote:
Originally posted by Demoted
Whereas with rock music there is not much to listen to. Only the Rolling Stones and Aerosmith. All forms of rock after this have yielded little to no production, and electronic music is the only form of music where there is a variety and vast amount of. The only.


Because production is all there is to music, right? And let's not forget, rock music isn't ever well produced...


Posted by RapidFire on Apr-15-2006 22:53:

Im pretty sure Demoted was being sarcastic there. at least I hope he was.


Posted by pvdclubber on Apr-15-2006 22:54:

quote:
Originally posted by Aquarian
I agree with this. I don't know how bad it is in europe, but I wouldn't hasitate to call armin or tiesto underground. Of course there are different levels of popularity. But by far the majority haven't heard of these names in their lifetimes. Even in a party city like montreal, trance practically doesn't exist. So that considered, all trance is underground here. Except maybe DJ Sammy - if you want to call that trance.


most people in germany have never heard of pvd


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Apr-15-2006 23:37:

quote:
Originally posted by RapidFire
Im pretty sure Demoted was being sarcastic there. at least I hope he was.


Yeah, he always seems like a smart guy. It didn't sound very sarky though...


Posted by Nsonic on Apr-16-2006 01:31:

quote:
Originally posted by pvdclubber
somebody brought up tiesticles, made me chuckle

I'm pretty sure tiesticles has been in my sig for a while now :P


Posted by Insomnia`SF on Apr-16-2006 01:39:

quote:
Originally posted by sandstorm03
tracks are underground if less then 130 people have heard it, and has been played less then 354 times. In a 60 mile radius.


lol


Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.