TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- The new Internet Explorer 7
Pages (2): « 1 [2]

OOOOOOWWWWWWWWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE yahahaaaaaaa *fireball revolving around*

'nuff said.

quote:

Originally posted by starsearcher Alright so far so good, but the text resolution is brutal...is it just me or is someone else having this problem? The graphics are good but the text is all fuzzy...wtf?!

Enable Cleartype?

quote:

Originally posted by VERTiG0 Enable Cleartype?

Ummmm I'm not sure, but doesn't seem like it...I can't even find that option

Re: The new Internet Explorer 7

quote:

Originally posted by starsearcher So I've just downloaded the Beta version and testing it out...so far it seems pretty good - they took all the best ideas from Firefox, except that the resolution is kind of lacking for some reason. Anyone else tried it yet?

Just tried it out.

Ive had an ERROR MSG now 3 fucking times in a row!

Bah this is driving me nutts I hate the fuzzy fonts lol

Re: Re: The new Internet Explorer 7

quote:

Originally posted by Jem_hadar Just tried it out. Ive had an ERROR MSG now 3 fucking times in a row!

Surprise, fucking surprise, hehe.

quote:

Originally posted by VERTiG0 Dell will NEVER EVER EVER EVER be ousted from their current place as market leader for OEM PC hardware. You can buy a Dell PC today for $299 without the monitor. Cheapest Apple? More than twice the price ($699). Apple has a reputation to uphold, and they will never sully their name with anything shittier than the piece of shit that is the Mac Mini. Dell makes their buck on business leases and shitbox $500 computers for people who don't know any better. It simply won't ever happen.

I don't think it'll take over dell either, but it'll take some of its clients away

quote:

Originally posted by malek i know this will sound weird... but what if there was only one standard, no more hassle trying to code for 343098 browsers. I know many web programmers know what I'm talking about.

Yah, crazy idea uh? lol.. That is exactly what browsers like Opera and Firefox allows us developers to do! Code to _the_ standard (w3). They render pages as close as close possible to the standard. It only makes sense, it is a hell of a lot easier to code to a standard than to code for "343098" browsers and their interpretation of how things should look/behave. It reduces complexcity, inviting developers to focus in more important tasks while providing a long-term viability.

However, don't think for a second that the standard should be MS's interpretation of what HTML/CSS/Javascript should be. Once you have standards being controlled by a single corporation which may have financial incentives to "adjust" these standards, contratry to popular believe, they will only look after the interests of their shareholders (not that it's always a bad thins ofcourse...). Ideally Standards should be open. Imagine a web where a single corporation holds control of the standard, where other organizations wanting to implement other web browsers would have to pay royalities to the owner of the standard (The whole mess of GIF comes to mind). Wow, there would be much less development, less competition for companies like MS, ultimately, less choice for us users. We would be browsing the web with 1998 technology (some of you are!). Imagine a web where websites only work for under the product of the standard's owner ..whoa! once again, us users would get the shitty end of the deal. A more extreme example.. imagine Ford gets in the business of making roads and these roads become the "defacto standard" but wait, these roads only work if you drive Ford cars! LOL. Your idea of having one standard is not a weird idea. It's actually the optimal solution if we want technology to progress while benefiting everyone, but my friend, IE has so far proven that it does not want to cooperate towards that goal.

quote:

Originally posted by malek I don't think it'll take over dell either, but it'll take some of its clients away

I even doubt that. No company is going to spend $600 on an Apple computer when they can spend $300 on a Dell to do the exact same thing, with the same reliability and support.

quote:

Originally posted by loconet

Thank you! Took the words right out of my mouth.

There's two types of standards, one written by a group of elite and scholars but which barely anyone follows (W3C) and the defacto standard set by a corporation and its partners that is used by 90% of users (Microsoft).


The defenition of a standard is very hard to apply to web technologies because of the reality described above.


I for one prefer defacto standards over standards set by a group of elites. Much easier and cost effective to develop to that 90% than to bother doing it for the rest.

The masses rules the technology, not the other way around.

quote:

Originally posted by malek There's two types of standards, one written by a group of elite and scholars but which barely anyone follows (W3C) and the defacto standard set by a corporation and its partners that is used by 90% of users (Microsoft).

W3C recommendations are actually written by the members of the Consortium, who are not all scholars. These members include a well balanced cross section of the industry. Members range from Microsoft itself to Stanford University to Google.

You could argue that it doesn't matter since nobody follows the standards anyways. However, imagine if there were no standards at all! even though nobody follows the standard perfectly (w3c here), the fact that they are actually followed to a certain extend alone makes it worth it! As users, we would be in a much bigger hole long term if this standards did not exist.

quote:

Originally posted by loconet W3C recommendations are actually written by the members of the Consortium, who are not all scholars. These members include a well balanced cross section of the industry. Members range from Microsoft itself to Stanford University to Google.

that obviously doesn't mean a thing, members don't always get their point thru, they also don't always participate. But get the scoop first so they can plan their products in accordance or to the best they can/want.

check the list here: http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Member/List

if it worked like you're implying, then Microsoft and Mozilla/firefox would interpret w3c guidlines the same way since both are part of it, but thats not the case.

standards are just a piece of paper with some abstracts, nothing more.

implementations are the real world, where products succeed (IE) and others fail (the rest) as seen with their market shares.

quote:

Originally posted by loconet However, imagine if there were no standards at all! even though nobody follows the standard perfectly (w3c here), the fact that they are actually followed to a certain extend alone makes it worth it! As users, we would be in a much bigger hole long term if this standards did not exist.

I could argue that no standards written by a third part are needed for the success of a said software.

a great example is directx, set forward by one company, it succeded because it just worked.

or Java, there's no standards that put it in place... and now its widespread.

quote:

Originally posted by malek I could argue that no standards written by a third part are needed for the success of a said software.

And I would disagree and so would history. David Wheeler illustrated the argument for standards at a conference ..

quote:

He went on to show the audience, through another word picture describing a 1904 fire in Baltimore, how open standards can prevent unhealthy dependence on one vendor. "Firefighters were called in from all the surrounding states," Wheeler said. "But all they could do was stand and watch the building burn, because their firehoses would not fit on the fire hydrants." A standard fire hose coupler could have prevented much of the destruction.

quote:

a great example is directx, set forward by one company, it succeded because it just worked. or Java, there's no standards that put it in place... and now its widespread.

I don't know, directx is an example of success? for who? Microsoft's pocket maybe. Directx actually illustarates part of my point since as a user I'm forced to use windows to run most games because directx is the defacto standard for game programming and most games require it. Now thankfully directx mainly deals with computer games. It would be a more serious issue if something more important like the web was controlled the way directx is. And about Java, some may see it as more open than not (JCP), in addition to the fact that several of the technologies Java uses are actually open standard and not to mention the fact that Sun is contantly playing with the idea of formalizing Java's "openness"

quote:

if it worked like you're implying, then Microsoft and Mozilla/firefox would interpret w3c guidlines the same way since both are part of it, but thats not the case.

But they do follow the guildelines, they may not follow it perfectly but at least both browsers know what to do when they see a <font> tag. If there weren't any standards they would each have their way of doing things, developers would either need to code for all those different ways or wait until one of them controls the defacto standard.

quote:

standards are just a piece of paper with some abstracts, nothing more. implementations are the real world, where products succeed (IE) and others fail (the rest) as seen with their market shares.

lol, standards are more than just a piece of paper! The whole internet is built on standards! HTML, TCP/IP, GSM, PCI , XMPP, CSS, etc. We use them every day. I think you will agree that we'd be in a whole different boat had a single corporation controlled the underlaying foundations of the technologies you and i are using to post these messages. And besides, the reason "the rest" have a smaller market share is not because they follow the standard. It's because of the monopoly on which IE is launched (a whole different topic) and shoved down everyone's throat. The masses are ignorant there is choice. Do you really think IE's market share would be as huge had it not been for Windows being installed in over 90% of desktops out there?

Blah, lol .. We could argue until the cows came home and for every "successful" defacto standard you mention, I could mention a whole bunch of successful open standards as well. There are valid points as well as pros and cons to both sides. That is reason why this is such an active topic of discussion in the industry. I don't know, as a developer who has experienced both sides, I'm more inclined to agree with openness but what do i know, im just a linux hippie

I mean fuck.. imagine Toronto was the defacto standard capital of Canada, how much would _you_ like that!

Re: The new Internet Explorer 7

quote:

Originally posted by starsearcher So I've just downloaded the Beta version and testing it out

Mistake, you'll regret this at some point

quote:

...so far it seems pretty good - they took all the best ideas from Firefox,

No suprise here.

quote:

except that the resolution is kind of lacking for some reason.

Because it is garbage

quote:

Anyone else tried it yet?

Never will, until M$ forces it down my throat via a windows update of some sort.


-Steve

Re: Re: The new Internet Explorer 7

quote:

Originally posted by cereal3825 Mistake, you'll regret this at some point No suprise here. Because it is garbage Never will, until M$ forces it down my throat via a windows update of some sort. -Steve

Hahahhahah, summed up in one brilliant post.

lol Steve...lova ya man

MSFT now scared they are losing a lot of market share have just hired Ray Ozzie...some internet software guru...hopefully they'll put him to good use

thx for telling me about this john

itll get some getting used to, but its not that new to me since i use netscape sometimes which has tabbed browsing

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.