TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- My Challenge ... You Liberals vs Rush Limbaugh - Have What It Takes?
Pages (6): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 »

Re: Re: Re: My Challenge ... You Liberals vs Rush Limbaugh - Have What It Takes?

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN lol. yeah, i always laugh when the new kids lump occ in with us liberals

New kids? LOL dude i was around when there was no PDD and everything was discussed in COR...YOU are the new kid.

Just as i thought...PKC and Nou called me names...lol...typical running away liberals.

Shall i up the price?

OK fine....now the price $100...and PKC i will also cover your phone bill...so 100 plus your bill.

You guys are frauds...if i was as confident as you guys are...and u sure act confident by the ways u attack anyone who disagrees with you with names like blinded, sheep and ignorant..then i would surely call...

This my friends is what we used to call "pulling someone's card"...i pulled all your cards and not one of you can man up to the challenge.


You guys claim to be so aware and can see through all the media lies and how Bush is like Stalin and blah blah blah...yet you cant debate someone? Shit if someone challenged me for money to debate someone on stiffening child molestor convictions it would be a breeze...because i am that confident in MY answers...i guess you guys are just a bunch of pussys sitting behind a computer afreaid to venture into the real world cus u might have to dodge a few black helicopters...ya you guys are real smart...hA!...anyone can be smart if they posted links to every webpage like you guys do...have any original thoughts u can share? Didnt think so...you guys lose.

Disgrace!! yet laughable.

id pay someone 100 dollars just to listen to rush

quote:

Originally posted by tiesto14 anyone can be smart if they posted links to every webpage like you guys do...have any original thoughts u can share? Didnt think so...you guys lose.

posting a link to an article is almost a prerequisite for a discussion here - to have some external source supporting your statement or describing an event 'objectively'...

(some of) you have too much trust invested in authorities in general - especially when they support 'your side'.

quote:

Originally posted by Nou I don't want to argue with him, I just wanted to point out that you are an idiot again.

Eh i admit i am not the smartest person. You, however, come off like you are...

Man up or shut up.

quote:

Originally posted by Psy-T posting a link to an article is almost a prerequisite for a discussion here - to have some external source supporting your statement or describing an event 'objectively'... (some of) you have too much trust invested in authorities in general - especially when they support 'your side'.

What i meant by the posting link thing was people here post endless links but dont seem to have any original views of their own...the kids here remind me of the frat boy that Matt Damon owned at the bar in Good Will Hunting.

quote:

Originally posted by Nou I don't want to argue with him, I just wanted to point out that you are an idiot again.

hahha you remind me of some kid who swears up and down he is a fast runner...but the minute someone challenges you, you fumble your words and say something stupid like "i have nothing to prove" or "i left my running shoes at home"

quote:

Originally posted by Nou I didn't come here to argue with Rush... I came here because you made this thread and I think you are a grade A fuckwad, and its fun to point it out.

Ya and at the same time you proved you have no balls. HAHAHA

quote:

Originally posted by Nou I don't have to prove anything, because I already did. Read the WW3 thread in the COR, I proved you wrong or called you out on your BS on almost every post...

Man up or shut up little boy

aaaawwww Nou are you scared to debate someone that is smarter then you? Why? cus u know Rush would own your ass and make you look like an ignorant high school kid...whats wrong u can dish it out to me but cant take it?

LOSER!

quote:

Originally posted by Nou I came here to troll you. Nothing more, nothing less.

Ya get off my nuts.

quote:

Originally posted by Nou Not till you cum honey bunch.

LOSER!!!...go brush your teeth nasty boy.

Tiesto;

If no one excepts this challenge, will you PLEASE call Rush on the open-mic. Friday and tell him about your challenge here in cyber-world? I think it might make for an intersting topic on "political blog/message board warriors" and their fear of over-coming the cyber-buffer between them and the real world, and speaking directly with Rush, lol. And if you do, please let us know in advance that you are calling so we can listen in.

Also agree 100% with your "links" theory about this board. There are some people who seem to think for themselves, but their are plenty who are link-aholics (Like Traner X...I sure don't miss his page long links with attached text of psycho-babble ).

The only thing i didn't like about trancer was the fact that he would post 10 823748732874 word threads and no one would respond and they would just take up space. lol

I still find it funny how not ONE person has the balls to call...not even when i am offering cash...proves these kids are frauds.

quote:

Originally posted by tiesto14 I still find it funny how not ONE person has the balls to call...not even when i am offering cash...proves these kids are frauds.

How does it prove they are frauds? I suppose all your conservatives spend your days ringing in to liberal radio shows giving your points of view and "owning that liiberal softie" on a daily basis?


i salute you oh brave one.

I have one important rule: I don't debate with idiots.

Nor do I debate with drug addicts, they're a little too unstable for me.

quote:

Originally posted by HardTranceProd I have one important rule: I don't debate with idiots. Nor do I debate with drug addicts, they're a little too unstable for me.

Well..I guess you cant win the 100 bucks then buddy...so sad

This is funny becuase people like tiesto14 and Kapedan are insisting that unless liberals don't call the show, that suddenly what they say here is wrong becuase they won't take the challege. So, if they don't take the challenge, their liberal views are worng, and if they do take the challenge, then they have to go on a talk radio station that throw out most of the rules of a good structured debate and are structured so that objecting opinions are made to look foolish by distracting tactics. It's like a win-win situation for tiesto14. AMazing my boy, you didn't even have to come up with any original arguments, and you've already won. You'll go far in politics.

quote:

Originally posted by OurManFlint This is funny becuase people like tiesto14 and Kapedan are insisting that unless liberals don't call the show, that suddenly what they say here is wrong becuase they won't take the challege. So, if they don't take the challenge, their liberal views are worng, and if they do take the challenge, then they have to go on a talk radio station that throw out most of the rules of a good structured debate and are structured so that objecting opinions are made to look foolish by distracting tactics. It's like a win-win situation for tiesto14. AMazing my boy, you didn't even have to come up with any original arguments, and you've already won. You'll go far in politics.

What the fuck are you on, amigos? I didnt say that, your just assuming I did. I havent posted much in this thread, but Ive followed it closely.

There are a few members in here that spend quality hours on politics and what goes on, and I dont see why not take the challenge to challege a conservative radio host when you know all that knowllegble. Since most of the Democrats in here think that Republicans are a bunch of idiots and this administration is wrong, or whatever issues like Iran, Iraq.


Id love to see hardcore trancer debate Rush Im gonna piss my pants off at that.

I also like to see Hardprod debate him about how there is no god or whatever he believes in.

Somebody should step up though, and us right wing minded people can maybe call a liberal show and take the challege.

First of all I'm not liberal. Second of all, if I cared enough to phone Limbaugh's show I doubt he would give the time that is needed to properly articulate a comprehensive argument.

If by some stroke of luck I were able to actually get on his show, no doubt by deceiving the screeners by pretending I was a complete ignoramous, I would probably question his "conservative" principles for his habitual drug use. Then I would question his "principles" altogether for preaching one thing, and leading a lifestyle completely contradictory to what he preaches ...

quote:

here's nothing good about drug use. We know it. It destroys individuals. It destroys families. Drug use destroys societies. Drug use, some might say, is destroying this country. And we have laws against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. And the laws are good because we know what happens to people in societies and neighborhoods, which become consumed by them. And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up. What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug use. Too many whites are getting away with drug sales. Too many whites are getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too. ...We are becoming too tolerant as a society, folks, especially of crime, in too many parts of the country.... This country certainly appears to be tolerant, forgive and forget. I mean, you know as well as I do, you go out and commit the worst murder in the world and you just say you're sorry, people go, "Oh, OK. A little contrition."... People say, "I feel better. He said he's sorry for it." We're becoming too tolerant, folks. --Rush Limbaugh TV show (10/5/95)

quote:

Originally posted by occrider First of all I'm not liberal. Second of all, if I cared enough to phone Limbaugh's show I doubt he would give the time that is needed to properly articulate a comprehensive argument.

This is a good point. It's not like calling in to his show will put forth anything constructive becuase of its lack of a structure that would provide a good, solid debate. And why Rush? I'm sure there are peaople that would represent a better republican and conservative take on issues.

Whats all this drug talk about? What was he caught with?

I'm just wondering, how exactly would the person calling be certain that you'll keep your promise and hand out 100$? I certainly wouldn't have a problem calling Rush regardless of who wins because I really wouldn't mind sacrificing my "reputation" on an internet board for real 100$.

But there are a couple of points you're missing on. First of them is that there's probably thousands of people calling Rush non-stop, so it's really a stroke of luck to be selected to talk to him. The second point is that regardless of whose debating skills are better, that really doesn't say much about the real issues at hand. There are smart and stupid liberals, as there are smart and stupid conservatives. I personally think some of the debaters here could hold their ground when confronted with Rush, although it's difficult to judge one's real life debating skills and quickness of thought judging by written word only.

That being said, I'd gladly accept your offer, but I doubt you'd be so stupid to send me 100$ after that. I mean, really..if someone would give you a 100$ to call a liberal commentator who you'd know would beat you in debate, wouldn't you do it? Of course you would. I would too. That being said, noone with the slightest trace of reason would offer someone 100$ for 5 minutes of work and slightly tarnished internet-pride. That's why noone is accepting your offer.

quote:

Originally posted by Michael19 Whats all this drug talk about? What was he caught with?

I think it was that he was taking strong pain medications without a prescription or with a fake one, but I'm not sure.

quote:

Originally posted by occrider If by some stroke of luck I were able to actually get on his show...I would probably question his "conservative" principles for his habitual drug use. Then I would question his "principles" altogether for preaching one thing, and leading a lifestyle completely contradictory to what he preaches ...

Soooo, why you telling us what you will say to him? Tell Rush yourself.

(BTW: I thought I heard just the other day that he'd been exonorated of any wrong doing with his perscription use of Oxycontin..am I wrong?)

quote:

Originally posted by DrUg_Tit0 I'm just wondering, how exactly would the person calling be certain that you'll keep your promise and hand out 100$? I certainly wouldn't have a problem calling Rush regardless of who wins because I really wouldn't mind sacrificing my "reputation" on an internet board for real 100$.

I think Pay Pal has a Buyer Protection Policy that would cover you.

So much for that theory.

quote:

Originally posted by donnybrasco Soooo, why you telling us what you will say to him? Tell Rush yourself.

It's all in the history but in case you missed it I said, "if I cared enough to phone Limbaugh's show". The context being I was challenged to phone his show as if I gave two shits about Rush or his opinion ... the point is I don't. It's like me telling you to phone some shitbag dj on air america, and unless you have a truly vacant life you would probably ignore me. Sorry, I have about a million better things to do, like first and foremost do some work.

quote:

(BTW: I thought I heard just the other day that he'd been exonorated of any wrong doing with his perscription use of Oxycontin..am I wrong?)

Haha no you see Rush settled:

quote:

On April 28, 2006, Limbaugh turned himself in to the Palm Beach County, Florida Sheriff's Office as part of a prearranged settlement to the case. He filed a "not guilty" plea with the Court and posted a $3,000 bond to a single criminal charge of doctor shopping to obtain about 40 prescription pills.[27] Although he was never placed in custody, the sherriff's office later told the media that Limbaugh was technically "under arrest" during the actual booking. The first wave of news reporting about the incident indicated that Limbaugh had been "arrested." Believing that this term would inappropriately invoke an image of the talk show host being handcuffed and hauled away in leg irons, Limbaugh and his attorney contacted various media outlets to inform them of the settlement. Black issued a statement indicating that Limbaugh had settled the charge with the state [28] and that the prosecutor agreed to dismiss the criminal charge if Limbaugh pays $30,000 to defray the cost of the investigation and completes an 18-month therapy regimen with his physician. Black stated: "...[T]he State Attorney's Office and Mr. Limbaugh have reached an agreement whereby a single count charge of doctor shopping filed today by the State Attorney will be dismissed in 18 months. As a primary condition of the dismissal, Mr. Limbaugh must continue to seek treatment from the doctor he has seen for the past two and one half years. This is the same doctor under whose care Mr. Limbaugh has remained free of his addiction without relapse. Mr. Limbaugh and I have maintained from the start that there was no doctor shopping, and we continue to hold this position. Accordingly, we filed today with the Court a plea of 'Not Guilty' to the charge filed by the State." [29] Limbaugh asserts that the state's settlement agreement resulted from a lack of evidence supporting the charge of "doctor shopping." Under the terms of the agreement, Limbaugh will continue to undergo random drug testing, which he acknowledges having undergone since 2003, and may not own a firearm.[30]

In case the irony was missed by you, that's exactly what he described in his preaching

quote:

What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug use. Too many whites are getting away with drug sales. Too many whites are getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too. ...We are becoming too tolerant as a society, folks, especially of crime, in too many parts of the country.... This country certainly appears to be tolerant, forgive and forget. I mean, you know as well as I do, you go out and commit the worst murder in the world and you just say you're sorry, people go, "Oh, OK. A little contrition."... People say, "I feel better. He said he's sorry for it." We're becoming too tolerant, folks. RUSH LIMBAUGH

And in case it was unclear, the agreement to see his doctor for rehabilitation is factually supportive of the fact that he has a drug addiction problem.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.