TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Pirates Of The Caribbean - He's A Pirate (Tiesto Remix) !!!
Pages (6): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 »


Posted by Abhay on Jun-19-2006 06:50:

quote:
Originally posted by kparker
I thought the 1st movie was pretty good as compared to most movies these days.


jesus,

how old are u, 8?

Isn't this the same movie about finding treasure, and pirates that turn to skeletons out of sunlight.

surely we couldn't be talking abotu the same movie.


Posted by Abhay on Jun-19-2006 06:57:

Maybe it was just the poor sound quality from this sample...

but that was shit...

it's no better than shitty cheap trance mixes by over-commercial producers that remix old classical tracks, or the 8-bit nintendo games sounds (poorly).

Seriously... wtf.... This guy's become no better than these cheap assholes that sell CDs u can pick up at service stations. The CDs for people who say that they just want to listen to "doof doof" music.


Posted by ThaMaestro on Jun-19-2006 09:30:

quote:
Originally posted by Konijn

--------

DJ Tiesto - 2006-05-19 - Live @ Outland, Avalon Street Party - Boston, US

01. Alex Stealthy - Something Is Wrong
02. Leon Bolier - My Precious
03. Solid Haze & Milez - Reduxed
04. ATB - Let U Go (E-Craig's 2005 Rework)
05. Super8 vs. DJ Tab - Helsinki Scorchin'
06. Leama & Moor - Everything Matters (Matthew Dekay Club Mix)
07. Supermode - Tell Me Why (Original Club Mix)
08. ID
09. Francesco Farfa - Acida 220 (David Tort Remix)
10. Tiesto - Traffic (DJ Montana 12" Edit)
11. Scott Mac - Damager 02 (Mac Zimms Remix)
12. BT - Somnambulist (Mark Norman Remix)
13. Re:Locate - Rogue
14. Simon Patterson - F16 (Mac & Mac Remix)
15. Jochen Miller - Chromatic (Miller Dub)
16. Midway - Cobra
17. Tiesto - Just Be (Original Mix)
18. Carl B - Social Suicide
19. Klaus Badelt - He's A Pirate (Tiesto Extended Mix)
20. Mark Norman - T34
21. Preach - Broken Inside


konijn = masterrrrr @ ID-ing tiesto.

though the mix isnt my thing to dance on, or get goosebumps by, tiesto somehow merged the main theme melody pretty 'okay' in the track. next to that, i think that if tiesto wants, he can make a mix out of this from which most of you tiesto-haters would instantly ejaculate, and get a massive orgasm .... but since u guys dont see that tiesto has to keep this mainstream and commercial, u dont understand why this mix is done the way it is ...


Posted by Abhay on Jun-19-2006 10:53:

quote:
Originally posted by ThaMaestro
konijn = masterrrrr @ ID-ing tiesto.

though the mix isnt my thing to dance on, or get goosebumps by, tiesto somehow merged the main theme melody pretty 'okay' in the track. next to that, i think that if tiesto wants, he can make a mix out of this from which most of you tiesto-haters would instantly ejaculate, and get a massive orgasm .... but since u guys dont see that tiesto has to keep this mainstream and commercial, u dont understand why this mix is done the way it is ...


why does it have to be so mainstream and commercial?


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Jun-19-2006 12:19:

quote:
Originally posted by Abhay
jesus,

how old are u, 8?

Isn't this the same movie about finding treasure, and pirates that turn to skeletons out of sunlight.

surely we couldn't be talking abotu the same movie.


No, it was actually very good in terms of mainstream action movies. If you weren't being so self-aware and concerned how you'd look watching a film about pirates, you'd probably be able to enjoy it. And Johnny Depp was hilarious- great offbeat performance.

EDIT: This track is shit though.


Posted by Lunar Phase 7 on Jun-19-2006 17:57:

Track aint that shit.

For what it is it does good.


Posted by ThaMaestro on Jun-19-2006 21:06:

quote:
Originally posted by Abhay
why does it have to be so mainstream and commercial?


well, i think (this is just my view on things, if you have other thoughts; no problem) that when tiesto would make a 'masterpiece', like for example 'Allure - The Love We Lost', which would be trance at its best, it would not 'touch' the public/audience who hears the remix during the movie. i assume the remix will be played in the movie, or during the commercial for the movie, because otherwise letting tiesto remix it would have no influence. just like what happened with that 007 movie, for which tiesto remixed madonna. although that track got playlisted quite often, the track has to fit in the concept. for example, if you like jonas steur's castamara, which is thought to be a great trance classic pur sang, it might not fit in the concept. the song has to be, i think, catchable. forgive me for my perhaps not-easy-to-follow explanation, im dutch, and i cant always find the right words. but i have the idea that such remixes have to be easy, so that the audience catches it up faitly easy. masterpiece trance anthems might also fit in a movie, for example, chicane's salt water might easily fit in a movie that has something to do with a beach, or surfing.

what i mean is that a remix/song has to get a touch/feeling within the audience. therefore, since not all people who go this movie are trance-freaks like us , might not like it if its some superb trance song, but totally not has a touch or feeling with the movie and its audience


u r getting my thoughts?


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Jun-19-2006 21:54:

quote:
Originally posted by ThaMaestro
i assume the remix will be played in the movie, or during the commercial for the movie, because otherwise letting tiesto remix it would have no influence.?


That's a fucking stupid assumption.


Posted by zenperson on Jun-19-2006 22:25:

Thumbs down

The track is complete garbage... Nothing original about it cept' it's uber complex melody which is way too much action in the high end... Sorry, add it to all of his other Tijsasters of recent years


Posted by Abhay on Jun-20-2006 00:00:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
No, it was actually very good in terms of mainstream action movies. If you weren't being so self-aware and concerned how you'd look watching a film about pirates, you'd probably be able to enjoy it. And Johnny Depp was hilarious- great offbeat performance.

EDIT: This track is shit though.


uh.

that was a shit movie.

I watched in a flight from some country to another. Maybe they cut parts out. BUt having parts cut out probably only made it better.

They should've cut the whole thing out.

Maybe i was too old for it or something. I dunno.


Posted by Abhay on Jun-20-2006 00:06:

quote:
Originally posted by ThaMaestro
well, i think (this is just my view on things, if you have other thoughts; no problem) that when tiesto would make a 'masterpiece', like for example 'Allure - The Love We Lost', which would be trance at its best, it would not 'touch' the public/audience who hears the remix during the movie. i assume the remix will be played in the movie, or during the commercial for the movie, because otherwise letting tiesto remix it would have no influence. just like what happened with that 007 movie, for which tiesto remixed madonna. although that track got playlisted quite often, the track has to fit in the concept. for example, if you like jonas steur's castamara, which is thought to be a great trance classic pur sang, it might not fit in the concept. the song has to be, i think, catchable. forgive me for my perhaps not-easy-to-follow explanation, im dutch, and i cant always find the right words. but i have the idea that such remixes have to be easy, so that the audience catches it up faitly easy. masterpiece trance anthems might also fit in a movie, for example, chicane's salt water might easily fit in a movie that has something to do with a beach, or surfing.

what i mean is that a remix/song has to get a touch/feeling within the audience. therefore, since not all people who go this movie are trance-freaks like us , might not like it if its some superb trance song, but totally not has a touch or feeling with the movie and its audience


u r getting my thoughts?


yeah, if it was made FOR the people who made the movie, i can understand. But if he made it of his own accord, i don't really understand the big deal.

I'm having a lot of trouble hearing the second version though. I'll have to see if i can listen to it


Posted by RapidFire on Jun-20-2006 00:08:

quote:
Originally posted by zenperson
Tijsasters


hello new catchphrase


Posted by A.J. on Jun-20-2006 00:30:

Thumbs down

Both tracks sound pretty cheap and crap.


The synths are WAY too 'busy' for my liking. I guess i have always hated trance tracks with synths all over the place like that. I much prefer nice, clean sounds with more low end and less shitty, boring chord progressions.


Oh well


Posted by Abhay on Jun-20-2006 01:57:

heard the extended Mix.

it was OK. But a bit "everywhere". Again a better quality feed might make it sound better, but the synths kept changing notes so quickly, and didn't really seem to blend musically-like.

I like the distorted "scratchy" sound in the background, that's very original.

certainly better than the orchestral version.


Posted by zenperson on Jun-20-2006 02:13:

Evil1

quote:
Originally posted by RapidFire
hello new catchphrase


u like that that, don't ya


Posted by ThaMaestro on Jun-20-2006 08:28:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
That's a fucking stupid assumption.


why?
letting a famous dj remix a track, and afterwards not using that remix to promote the movie is a bit stupid i think ... caus then, what has been the use of eltting someone (prolly) expensive make a remix for it, and not using it?


Posted by ThaMaestro on Jun-20-2006 08:30:

quote:
Originally posted by Abhay
yeah, if it was made FOR the people who made the movie, i can understand. But if he made it of his own accord, i don't really understand the big deal.

I'm having a lot of trouble hearing the second version though. I'll have to see if i can listen to it


yes i mean that its 'made'/used for the people who are GOING TO THE CINEMA TO SEE THE MOVIE. not for the actors and directors who made the movie, like u said


Posted by eRRaTiK on Jun-20-2006 13:15:


Posted by daeus on Jun-20-2006 15:00:

I once read tiesto dosnt make many of his own tunes did he make this one?

Cant remember the names of the producers ppl were mentioning who made tunes for him.

something - boy? god knows


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Jun-20-2006 16:36:

quote:
Originally posted by ThaMaestro
why?
letting a famous dj remix a track, and afterwards not using that remix to promote the movie is a bit stupid i think ... caus then, what has been the use of eltting someone (prolly) expensive make a remix for it, and not using it?


What would the possible advantage be of sticking an anachronistic thumping trance record in a period action adventure film? It'd be fucking stupid and anachronistic. This is a huge budget, professional film by a big studio. They aren't going to put some tacky Dutch trance record in there to "promote" a sequel to one of the highest grossing films of recent years.


Posted by ThaMaestro on Jun-20-2006 16:48:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
What would the possible advantage be of sticking an anachronistic thumping trance record in a period action adventure film? It'd be fucking stupid and anachronistic. This is a huge budget, professional film by a big studio. They aren't going to put some tacky Dutch trance record in there to "promote" a sequel to one of the highest grossing films of recent years.


your right on that, thats true. of course, if they would 'plug' it in to the movie, it would have to fit. but letting a theme track being remixed by 1 of the worlds biggest dj's isnt cheap. next to that, its a powerful tool to promote your movie. they somehow didnt let tiesto remix it for fun. they will use it and market it.

can you remmeber that 007 movie, with a madonna them track and tiesto's mix? if im right, tiesto's mix was played during the opening scene or in the beginning of the movie.

your right on when you say that 'sticking an anachronistic thumping trance record in a period action adventure film' is not by defintion something that fits. but somehow, the authors will use tiesto's mix as a powerful tool ... (damn, i was i could express myself better sometimes in english )

hope your getting my point a bit. if not, flame back


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Jun-20-2006 16:49:

They'll probably use it- if not in a trailer or official game version then just to use the club play. But I'll eat my foot if it appears in the film itself.


Posted by ThaMaestro on Jun-20-2006 16:52:

quote:
Originally posted by daeus
I once read tiesto dosnt make many of his own tunes did he make this one?

Cant remember the names of the producers ppl were mentioning who made tunes for him.



u might have read it HERE


Posted by ThaMaestro on Jun-20-2006 16:55:

quote:
Originally posted by ThaMaestro
your right on that, thats true. of course, if they would 'plug' it in to the movie, it would have to fit. but letting a theme track being remixed by 1 of the worlds biggest dj's isnt cheap. next to that, its a powerful tool to promote your movie. they somehow didnt let tiesto remix it for fun. they will use it and market it.

can you remmeber that 007 movie, with a madonna them track and tiesto's mix? if im right, tiesto's mix was played during the opening scene or in the beginning of the movie.

your right on when you say that 'sticking an anachronistic thumping trance record in a period action adventure film' is not by defintion something that fits. but somehow, the authors will use tiesto's mix as a powerful tool ... (damn, i was i could express myself better sometimes in english )

hope your getting my point a bit. if not, flame back



we'll see


Posted by skip on Jun-20-2006 17:45:

quote:
Originally posted by ThaMaestro

can you remmeber that 007 movie, with a madonna them track and tiesto's mix? if im right, tiesto's mix was played during the opening scene or in the beginning of the movie.



no. that was the original. the ti�sto remix was never even released officially, only on the white/bootleg with the street spirit remix.


Pages (6): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.