TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- THE DOCKS please support us in our fight to stay open
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »


Posted by Jayx1 on Jul-25-2006 20:41:

those auto replies are total cop out, pass the buck replies.

Yes the city doesnt DIRECTLY contol the AGCO and technically it is a provincial body. But they know damn well that they create the local bylaws that the AGCO enforces on their behalf. And they know damn well that if the city were to put pressure on the AGCO to lay off they most certainly would.

This is not a dalton mcguinty issue mr miller. You know that you have the power to call off the hounds. Quit pretending like you dont.


Posted by E*Master on Jul-25-2006 21:19:

I don't get mad very often when I read something, especially when it hits locally. But this is the biggest amount of bullshit I have ever heard. How many people live on the islands???? Like -500???!!! How many visitors does the Docks have anually? Do the blooddy math! That club brings a lot into Toronto's economy and is a landmark club. I sent my email to all the addresses thedocks.com provided. Keepo sending them. Over the last 8 years I have watched a lot of the palces from my late teenage years and early 20s close. I WILL NOT see this one go too!!!!!!!!


Posted by chinamon on Jul-25-2006 21:20:

To Whom It May Concern,

Fuck You.

Signed,
Disappointed In The Suburbs




Posted by -=ryancoke=- on Jul-25-2006 21:28:

I have sent an e-mail as well. Those whiney islanders are always complaining about something. This is a dangerous precedent being set here in my opinion. I hope that this situation is cleared up. It would be sad to see such a landmark disapear


Posted by Fir3start3r on Jul-25-2006 21:28:

quote:
Originally posted by Floorwhore
The mayor believes that the city has an obligation to enforce noise bylaws no matter where the offence takes place. It doesn�t matter if it�s a nightclub downtown or a neighbourhood bar in Scarborough or a corner pub in East York. Noise is one of the most frequent complaints made to the city. Businesses have to follow the rules of their license.


The City probably should have thought about that (the noise) before approving the residential developments (like all the condos) in the MIDDLE OF A CITY.
Hello?
Am I the only one that thinks they're hypocrites for even bringing this up...?


Posted by TranceKitten on Jul-25-2006 23:57:

NOOOOO!!!!

I am sending them a huge long ass letter telling them why this club is one of the best clubs in toronto (All of Toronto) and why it must not close!!!!
Those stupid old people at the island need to stop complaining about something that thousands of peopls enjoy!!!
This is pretty much the only decent and fun place to go in the summertime especially and they are trying to get rid of it?? GRRR!!!
I am majorly enraged and saddened over this since I heard it in the news this morning....this city will suck without a club like The Docks.


Posted by dallastar on Jul-26-2006 02:52:

done and done!

mind you, I never go to the Docks anymore, been there, done that and I saw that murder at the hullabuloo and that kinda made a impression on me ever going there again, I hope that everythign works out for them, and if worse comes to worse they could always just stick to the day time events and tourism stuff.

Ciao 4 now


Posted by Angx on Jul-26-2006 03:03:

now i know why montreal has a better night life than Toronto....how fuuucking sad.


Posted by Tricky_T on Jul-26-2006 04:58:

quote:
Originally posted by chinamon
To Whom It May Concern,

Fuck You.

Signed,
Disappointed In The Suburbs





Best Letter EVER!!! I'm writing mine now... I might be a little more diplomatic,,, lol... If this goes through... say GOODBYE to rooftop patios!! However, I have an honest belief that the city will back the docks in the end,,, (always the optomist),,, what it comes down to is they will miss the tax dollars received from the docks, and even if all 6 to 8 hundred residents up and left the island, there will always be people waiting to move in...

Besides all that,,, where in Toronto will Tijs play??? hahaha

~peace


Posted by E2EK1EL on Jul-26-2006 08:35:

Re: THE DOCKS please support us in our fight to stay open

quote:
Originally posted by techead
As you all now know The Docks is in danger of being closed down, we need your support

please open the following link

www.thedocks.com and click on SUPPORT US.

We need letters of support stating why they support The Docks and/or why we still should still be able to operate. We provide this city with an amazing outlet for all tourists, residents, local businesses and as well for our own staff and partners. Please speak up, we will need all the letters we can get. Even short letters are fine, they do not need to be long.


A sincerely apology to Jayx1

I�m sorry if I dissed & offended you with my comment in protest thread. I hope you realize it�s a figure of speech and I hope you didn�t take it the wrong way. I�m also upset at what happened to the Docks and just stating my opinion about how the protest wouldn�t work. People make mistakes when they are upset and act irrational. Maybe I�m wrong, but with the iDANCE rally � it only help for a bit and suddenly the city has made an unfair protocol with the by laws of holding raves on city owned venues.

(Personal Suggestion)
I was going to mention to have a massive petition with 1000s of people supporting it. Have people volunteering to chill outside of the clubs (like the street team promoters) and to get people to sign it on the way out. You can add this with protest to have even more support.

I�ve always loved the Docks since my first rave in 95 and with the Docks being shutdown if the bill gets passed. Working at System for several years, and when that got shutdown, I was pretty depressed, even at the present time. And to loose another legendary venue/club, only would make what�s left of our saturated scene, grow even thinner. Yes I do work for The Guvernment Complex and This is London, but loosing more and more clubs/venues really makes me upset, because we need them. History repeats itself, and I�ll be dammed if we totally loose the Docks.

Once again my sincerely, apologies to you Jayx1

Sincerely,

John Tang

PS

I will be writing my short letter to show my support.


Posted by StereoPrincess on Jul-26-2006 13:26:

There is also this petition:

http://www.petitiononline.com/thedocks/petition.html

someone has to rewrite it to make sense but at least it's something else to do.


Posted by dEsidEL on Jul-26-2006 13:35:

quote:


Docks shutdown sparks noise debate
Residents send bar owners a message
Work with us to reduce noise, conflict

Jul. 26, 2006. 05:41 AM
JESSICA LEEDER
STAFF REPORTER

It doesn't have to be this way.

That's the message sleep-deprived residents in the city's entertainment districts want to send bar operators in the wake of a surprising noise crackdown at the Docks nightclub this week that threatens the bar's future.

"We actually aren't against the clubs," said Wayne Scott, chairman of the King-Spadina Residents Association, a coalition of concerned residents who live between University Ave. and Bathurst St., and Queen and Front Sts., among the city's highest concentration of bars, restaurants and nightclubs. For two years, the association has been working to help residents and clubs peacefully coexist.

"What we're against are club operators who let their clubs spill out into the neighbourhood," Scott said. "The law doesn't give them the right to impact the neighbourhood the way they do."

In Scott's neighbourhood, residents and some club owners have put their heads together to come up with compromise noise solutions. "It's gone from being the Wild West where anything goes, to a transition period," Scott said. "In many ways, we're optimistic."

John Cavalieri is the general manager of the Peter St. club complex that houses Level Nightclub, Suite 106 and Wet Bar, which together can accommodate 1,600 partygoers. Cavalieri said he didn't mind making changes when he realized the impact that noise was having on nearby residents.

"We realized the sound system was facing the residents, so we put in surround sound to face the customers," he said. "We also put a noise wall up, made of concrete and wood, to absorb and stop the music from going out that way. Since then, we haven't received a complaint."

Cavalieri said he didn't see residents as "chronic complainers."

"Who wants to get up at 2 a.m. when you have to work a 9 a.m.-to-5 p.m. job? Nobody wants to do that. It's a legitimate complaint," he said, adding: "And you could lose your licence over it."

The co-operation strategy has worked so well, Scott said, that other residents' associations are calling him for advice. He said the Docks crackdown has made him even more optimistic that club owners who have shied away from meeting with residents' associations will come around instead of risking a liquor licence shutdown.

Earlier this week, the 10,000-person waterfront entertainment club had its liquor licence revoked over noise complaints in a precedent-setting decision � the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario has suspended, but never removed, a licence solely because of noise issues.

Lawyers for the club say they plan to appeal, which could trigger a long court struggle.

The city has for years tried to get the Docks to comply with noise restrictions, said spokesman Brad Ross. But the end goal, he said, was not to shut the place down.

"We're not in the business of putting business out of business," he said. "This certainly isn't a blitz on clubs and noise."

With files from Debra Black and Paul Moloney


http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/Co...72154&t=TS_Home


Posted by The Highroller on Jul-26-2006 16:10:

Can anyone (Jay?) tell me exactly what happened when the Islanders were supposed to get evicted a couple of years ago?


Posted by rabbitjoker on Jul-26-2006 17:59:

http://www.petitiononline.com/thedocks/petition.html


Posted by Chris Allen on Jul-26-2006 18:34:

I'd have no issue signing a petition that wasn't riddled with spelling and grammatical errors.


Posted by NuERA on Jul-26-2006 23:23:

even my dad says its rediculas and that the islanders are a bunch of whiners...and trust me, hes not much of a nightclub fan.


Posted by AdReNaLiNa on Jul-27-2006 02:25:

Interesting editorial in The Sun criticizing Miller's take on this issue..

T.O. Miller's no-fun dream


Posted by dEsidEL on Jul-27-2006 03:37:

quote:
Originally posted by AdReNaLiNa
Interesting editorial in The Sun criticizing Miller's take on this issue..

T.O. Miller's no-fun dream


quote:

T.O. Miller's no-fun dream
By JOE WARMINGTON

At least now we know who is in charge. Who would have thought a bunch of cottagers -- many of whom don't pay property taxes while living on disputed land -- would have so much clout? Turns out they call the shots.

First, the island airport bridge was killed and now perhaps The Docks. Beware, party boats. Keep your weddings in check!

Welcome to Mayor David Miller's Toronto -- a city where more stuff on the harbour seems to get shut down than what goes up. Old Marx and Lenin would be so proud.

Perhaps soon The Docks will be a vacant wasteland, like the goofy Rochester ferry building -- another Miller success story. "Noise is a huge topic across this city," he told the Sun's Rob Granatstein. "Businesses have to follow the laws. We're a big city, and noise and quiet matter to people, whether it's on the waterfront or elsewhere."

The guy who runs a panhandling business and defecates on the sidewalk daily doesn't seem to follow the rules and still gets to stay -- even if he yells out at the top of his lungs that he is the messiah. He's a messiah who also doesn't pay taxes.

Imagine keeping a straight face while busting a nightclub for being noisy? Serve booze, but keep it down! This is the latest embarrassment in a city that could be so unbelievably great. Even Miller's chief rival, Councillor Jane Pitfield, was complaining there are too many nightclubs in the Entertainment District.

What? That's why they call it the Entertainment District! Maybe council would prefer the buildings to be vacant, or occupied by a "quiet" methadone clinic.

At the city entrance there should be a sign: "No fun." You know you won't see any of these quiet seekers protesting the noise at the Gay Pride Parade, Caribana, after a Maple Leaf playoff win, or a protest against former premier Mike Harris. Nor should they.

Meanwhile The Docks, which recently invested $4 million in renovations, gets no breaks -- tax or otherwise. It's an easy target for a pack of bullies led by the dynamite duo of Councillors Paula Fletcher and Pam McConnell.

"We wanted to shut them up, not shut them down," Fletcher told Granatstein. "But the ACGO is shutting them down because they won't shut up. The city isn't shutting anybody down."

Nudge-nudge, wink-wink. That's why late yesterday, fresh off the kill, city staffers were flexing their muscles, warning other clubs beware. Too bad they wouldn't chase the murderous gangs. Gunfire and sirens are noisy too.

No, the latest victim of the leftist-controlled city and province is The Docks because some granola-eating islanders want to live the life of gentry right inside the city that the rest of us pay taxes in. The Docks pays taxes too.

And its 300 jobs are in jeopardy, thanks to a ridiculous ruling by the Alcohol and Gaming Commission to go all out and "revoke" its liquor licence in mid-summer.

There must have been other things they could have done, says David Knights, who owns one of 10 businesses in limbo at The Docks. "Why didn't they at least wait until the fall?"

Now dozens of university kids are counting on a judge to overturn the decision this Friday.

The place was virtually empty yesterday -- like much of the rest of the portlands. Maybe a tent city would be better? Or a giant safe-injection zone. Don't laugh.

"The city wants that land," said a source, adding The Docks could be a problem for a potential Expo bid.

Docks owner Jerry Sprachman has made no secret of his dream of having a casino -- which doesn't fit Miller's vision of cars and helicopters are bad and bikes are good.

Perhaps council is jealous because The Docks has managed to do what it hasn't. Unlike the city, this guy Sprachman created something unique on the ugly, unused waterfront -- swimming, beach volleyball, golf, live music, dancing, go-karting and even a night at the drive-in movie! And he did it with no taxpayers' cash.

No wonder those in charge hate him.

-----------------------------------------

� You can call Joe Warmington at (416) 947-2392 or e-mail at [email protected][/email]

� Have a letter for the editor? E-mail it to [email][email protected]


Posted by Tricky_T on Jul-27-2006 04:16:

quote:
Originally posted by AdReNaLiNa
Interesting editorial in The Sun criticizing Miller's take on this issue..

T.O. Miller's no-fun dream


Bomb editorial, right on the money, on every topic surrounding the issue... It is uplifting to know that the masses got to read our take on this, just too bad that Warmington doesn't write for the Globe and Mail...

~peace


Posted by dEsidEL on Jul-27-2006 04:55:



these ppl below need to learn to quite down in public for fear of disturbing someone:





Posted by The Highroller on Jul-27-2006 15:18:

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing this letter to express my disappointment in the ACGO�s recent decision to revoke The Docks� liquor license due to apparent noise complaints by the residents of the Toronto Islands.

Tens of thousands of patrons visit The Docks every year. From corporate functions, to drive in movies, to nights of dancing, The Docks provides a unique experience to tourists and Toronto residents alike. With the largest licensed outdoor patio, it is easy to say that The Docks is one of Toronto�s major tourist attractions. Revoking The Docks� liquor license effectively removes its major revenue earning vehicle. Without the ability to sell liquor, The Docks will surely close. The economic effects are harsh: 400 lost jobs and $39,000,000 of tax revenue from all 3 levels of government. How will these governments compensate for this lost revenue? I do not believe many tax payers will be too keen on the idea of picking up the tab.

The residents of the Toronto Island pay an extremely low price for a lease to live on the Toronto Islands. From my understanding, the Islanders paid $30,000-$42,000 to live 99 years on the land. This works out to about $25 per month. Considering the size and location of these lots, this price is extremely unfair. What these people pay to live on this property is significantly less than what the average citizen pays in property taxes alone. Yet somehow, even with these artificial, ultra-low priced leases, these favoured citizens are holding the development of our waterfront hostage. The Toronto Islands are in close proximity to the center of the largest city in Canada. Therefore, the belief of the Toronto Island residents that they have a �right� to peace and quiet in this very noisy area is not only ridiculous, but also very selfish.

We constantly like to tell ourselves that Toronto is a world-class city. I would have to disagree. We are almost there, but there are certain things we need to do to get to the finish line. The developed waterfront is a key ingredient to becoming a world class city. With this decision by the ACGO, development of the waterfront is going backwards, and we are getting farther and farther away from becoming a world-class city. If we keep listening to the noise complaints of the residents of the Toronto Island, the waterfront will stay unused until that 99 year lease is finally up.


Posted by AdReNaLiNa on Jul-27-2006 17:08:

^^
Very well said.. particularly the last paragraph. If the city leaders do not see this point, then Toronto will never be able to reach its full potential as a metropolitan city.


Posted by LiamK on Jul-27-2006 20:29:

I've sent a letter. This whole thing is obscene. I hope I don't live to see the day we lose the last of our freedom in case someone else doesn't like us exercising it.


Posted by StereoPrincess on Jul-27-2006 20:53:

quote:
Originally posted by [NFC]Wave
I'd have no issue signing a petition that wasn't riddled with spelling and grammatical errors.


OMG. Chris. WE AGREE!


Posted by yankeeBaby on Jul-27-2006 21:20:

Done and done. Short and sweet letter.


Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.