TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Montreal
-- Vestax Carl Cox Mixer for sale - SIgned by Carl Cox himself
Pages (2): « 1 [2]


Posted by Wisnia on Aug-23-2006 00:59:

quote:
Originally posted by nchs09
doesnt that by itself make it better? do u want a blender attachment?


Well the 62, has two assignable filter knobs as well. The only difference is that only one type of filter could be used on those assigned channels. On the 92, you could assign any filter you want to the channels. I could see myself being satisfied with the 62 for awhile before i truely master the filters.


Posted by dj ugo on Aug-23-2006 03:21:

Allen & Heath mixers sounds really better than all Vestax mixer and other kind of mixer, maybe a few exceptions. The reason is simple, they use part of studio mixer(console. For 2000$ you'll have a Urei, and for 3500$ a Rane. I know those a knob mixer, and it's different kind of mixing, but for slide mixer there's no compagny on the market right now beating Allen & heath!!

And by the way, for sound quality, all the parts of your sound system are important even the neddle of your turnatable and the cables of the setup.


Posted by moevalith on Aug-23-2006 03:25:

All I need in this life of sin is just me and my xone....

Xone > *

penny & giles are also the smoothest faders i know of too.


Posted by dj ugo on Aug-23-2006 03:28:

quote:
Originally posted by moevalith
All I need in this life of sin is just me and my xone....

Xone > *

penny & giles are also the smoothest faders i know of too.


I don't have xone but i agree whit you!!!


Posted by moevalith on Aug-23-2006 03:36:

quote:
Originally posted by dj ugo
I don't have xone but i agree whit you!!!


I give mine a good filter sex session everynight, glad you agree though!


Posted by dj ugo on Aug-23-2006 03:38:

quote:
Originally posted by moevalith
I give mine a good filter sex session everynight, glad you agree though!


hehehe, i have a good setup, enough to get a good sex session too, don't worry!!!


Posted by moevalith on Aug-23-2006 03:42:

quote:
Originally posted by Wisnia
Why is it definitly better? For the price i dont know if its worth spending an extra gran. It has filters assignable to each channel, what else?


You said it, 2 assignable filters(with an LFO to each, adjustable depth too), 2 aux send-receives(good when u want to assign your FX device to its own channel), optional rotary devices for levels, no biggy on this one but the LEDS light up like Red Green Blue X-mas lights..

I promise that you will want the 92!!

It is also industry standard afaik!


Posted by Wisnia on Aug-23-2006 04:04:

quote:
Originally posted by moevalith
You said it, 2 assignable filters(with an LFO to each, adjustable depth too), 2 aux send-receives(good when u want to assign your FX device to its own channel), optional rotary devices for levels, no biggy on this one but the LEDS light up like Red Green Blue X-mas lights..

I promise that you will want the 92!!

It is also industry standard afaik!


So now your saying that the 62 isnt good enough ?


Posted by ~*Stereohead*~ on Aug-23-2006 15:29:

The retards at MOOG erased the fkn signature when it was sent to be cleaned.

It's soooooooo much fun to play with and I heart the chunkiness to it 10000%. Filters make all the difference.

Thanks for letting me play with it Haki


Posted by FunKenLouis on Aug-23-2006 16:24:

quote:
Originally posted by ~*Stereohead*~
The retards at MOOG erased the fkn signature when it was sent to be cleaned.

It's soooooooo much fun to play with and I heart the chunkiness to it 10000%. Filters make all the difference.

Thanks for letting me play with it Haki


Carl Cox is playing on it at Stereo.... so he will sign it once again


Posted by noway on Aug-23-2006 16:28:

arkk crisse qui sont pas fort !!!


Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.