TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Fedde Le Grand - put your hands up for detroit.....
Pages (6): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 »
Please explain why it's
| quote: |
| Originally posted by UWM Fucking horrible. |
I understand why people hate this track. It's cheap, it doesn't do anything remotely innovative, and in essence can be categorized as "More of the Same-Old."
But I like it. I'd more than likely never play it, but I like hearing it out.
I play the TV Rock & Dirty South remix of it - it really gets people going. The original's not my cup of tea, but I don't think it's as horrible as everyone's making it out to be.
And for the record, no one actually puts their hands up for Detroit. Not even in Detroit. And it's the farthest thing from "our lovely city". Trust me, when you walk around downtown at 3 in the morning ater a gig you'll be scared shitless 
I like it acctually. Has some nice vibe to it. Could be less repetative though ;P
How many of you people who are ripping apart Detroit have actually ever been there?
I fuckin' love that town.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DJ RJT How many of you people who are ripping apart Detroit have actually ever been there? I fuckin' love that town. |
Put Your Hands Up For Sheboygan
... would be way better. someone needs to make it.
it sounds really good in a club
| quote: |
| Originally posted by iammesol Please explain why it's before you start looking down on people for accepting this song... It's actually mixed and mastered very well, and it definately fills floors. I honestly don't see why people hate it other than the fact that it's so popular. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by l�cid Put Your Hands Up For Sheboygan ... would be way better. someone needs to make it. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by iammesol I honestly don't see why people hate it other than the fact that it's so popular. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by retrobyte you mean Cheboygan? |

Put Your Hands up For Waukesha
| quote: |
| Originally posted by UWM Put Your Hands up For Waukesha |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by UWM For one, who am I looking down on? I didn't like this song the first time I heard it months before it was being played out, and I still don't. It does nothing for me. It's gimmicky on purpose. Sure it's mastered and mixed fine, but so what? You can't polish a turd. Oh, and nice one calling out the hating for it being popular. That's always a classic response. |
Yay for it if it works well on a dancefloor.
But when I hear it 4 times a day on the radio I'm not thinking "jeez this song is awesome becuase it works a dancefloor", I'm thinking "turn this fucking shit off".
Its a shit song, as UMW said you can't polish a turd.
heh, i had no idea this tune was renowned. i've only heard it twice on pete tong's radio show at work & thought it was ghastly... glad i'm not the only one!
three of my workmates who aren't into dance music & never comment on what's on the radio actually stopped & asked "what the fuck is this crap?".. i was cringing at the thought of them thinking i was into stuff like that
| quote: |
| Originally posted by UWM For one, who am I looking down on? I didn't like this song the first time I heard it months before it was being played out, and I still don't. It does nothing for me. It's gimmicky on purpose. Sure it's mastered and mixed fine, but so what? You can't polish a turd. Oh, and nice one calling out the hating for it being popular. That's always a classic response. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by UWM Harold you know better than to defend rubbish like this. |
So if I tell you the SHM sound is old and played-out, does that mean that I'm hating on it because it's popular, or am I simply stating my personal opinion?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Phortastic Like being said before in this thread: it's repetitive and it goes NOWHERE. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by UWM So if I tell you the SHM sound is old and played-out, does that mean that I'm hating on it because it's popular, or am I simply stating my personal opinion? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by iammesol no... it means you're not paying attention to Eric Prydz. Other than him you're right |
I don't consider algebra math 
A more apt analogy would be to say that you don't lump Biophysical Thermodynamics in with undergraduate science courses. Granted, the course is offered at the undergraduate level, however in both difficulty and scope it is far above and beyond all other courses and, as such, it's inclusion in the undergraduate sciences is simply a technicality, though not pragmatic.
*agrees*
See, I enjoy you when you aren't lazy with your posting 
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.