TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Fedde Le Grand - put your hands up for detroit.....
Pages (6): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 »


Posted by iammesol on Aug-16-2006 18:56:

Please explain why it's

quote:
Originally posted by UWM
Fucking horrible.


before you start looking down on people for accepting this song...




It's actually mixed and mastered very well, and it definately fills floors. I honestly don't see why people hate it other than the fact that it's so popular.


Posted by RJT on Aug-16-2006 19:05:

I understand why people hate this track. It's cheap, it doesn't do anything remotely innovative, and in essence can be categorized as "More of the Same-Old."

But I like it. I'd more than likely never play it, but I like hearing it out.


Posted by retrobyte on Aug-16-2006 19:06:

I play the TV Rock & Dirty South remix of it - it really gets people going. The original's not my cup of tea, but I don't think it's as horrible as everyone's making it out to be.

And for the record, no one actually puts their hands up for Detroit. Not even in Detroit. And it's the farthest thing from "our lovely city". Trust me, when you walk around downtown at 3 in the morning ater a gig you'll be scared shitless


Posted by PutBoy on Aug-16-2006 19:07:

I like it acctually. Has some nice vibe to it. Could be less repetative though ;P


Posted by RJT on Aug-16-2006 19:20:

How many of you people who are ripping apart Detroit have actually ever been there?

I fuckin' love that town.


Posted by Ted Promo on Aug-16-2006 19:32:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ RJT
How many of you people who are ripping apart Detroit have actually ever been there?

I fuckin' love that town.


I have. It's the absolute armpit of America.


Posted by l�cid on Aug-16-2006 19:43:

Put Your Hands Up For Sheboygan

... would be way better. someone needs to make it.


Posted by Maor Levi on Aug-16-2006 19:45:

it sounds really good in a club


Posted by UWM on Aug-16-2006 20:03:

quote:
Originally posted by iammesol
Please explain why it's

before you start looking down on people for accepting this song...

It's actually mixed and mastered very well, and it definately fills floors. I honestly don't see why people hate it other than the fact that it's so popular.


For one, who am I looking down on?

I didn't like this song the first time I heard it months before it was being played out, and I still don't. It does nothing for me. It's gimmicky on purpose. Sure it's mastered and mixed fine, but so what? You can't polish a turd.

Oh, and nice one calling out the hating for it being popular. That's always a classic response.


Posted by retrobyte on Aug-16-2006 20:39:

quote:
Originally posted by l�cid
Put Your Hands Up For Sheboygan

... would be way better. someone needs to make it.


you mean Cheboygan?

I think Put Your Hands Up For Mackinac would be even better than that.


Posted by Az on Aug-16-2006 21:11:

quote:
Originally posted by iammesol
I honestly don't see why people hate it other than the fact that it's so popular.

fuck


Posted by l�cid on Aug-16-2006 21:22:

quote:
Originally posted by retrobyte
you mean Cheboygan?

nope, Sheboygan

as for PYHUFD (what a silly acronym that tune makes)... i don't love it, but i don't hate it. i won't ever play it but i also won't run out of the room in disgust if a DJ drops it.

but starting a set with it, that is just laughable.


Posted by UWM on Aug-16-2006 21:35:

Put Your Hands up For Waukesha


Posted by l�cid on Aug-16-2006 21:42:

quote:
Originally posted by UWM
Put Your Hands up For Waukesha


Posted by Phortastic on Aug-16-2006 21:42:

quote:
Originally posted by UWM
For one, who am I looking down on?

I didn't like this song the first time I heard it months before it was being played out, and I still don't. It does nothing for me. It's gimmicky on purpose. Sure it's mastered and mixed fine, but so what? You can't polish a turd.

Oh, and nice one calling out the hating for it being popular. That's always a classic response.


+1

Hating it cause its popular always makes me laugh too.

I love This is Not miami and its fucking popular too, OMG

And seriously if u dont hear why the most in this thread here dont like this tune than there's something wrong with your ears. Sure, u can like it, no problem there. But not understanding even remotely why we don't like it surprises me. Like being said before in this thread: it's repetitive and it goes NOWHERE. Doesnt make me nod my head or tap my foot even once. And yeah i've heard it on the dancefloor aswell. Its as bad as it is on the dancefloor here at my place


Posted by Trance Nutter on Aug-17-2006 01:15:

Yay for it if it works well on a dancefloor.

But when I hear it 4 times a day on the radio I'm not thinking "jeez this song is awesome becuase it works a dancefloor", I'm thinking "turn this fucking shit off".

Its a shit song, as UMW said you can't polish a turd.


Posted by isoterra on Aug-17-2006 01:32:

heh, i had no idea this tune was renowned. i've only heard it twice on pete tong's radio show at work & thought it was ghastly... glad i'm not the only one!

three of my workmates who aren't into dance music & never comment on what's on the radio actually stopped & asked "what the fuck is this crap?".. i was cringing at the thought of them thinking i was into stuff like that


Posted by iammesol on Aug-17-2006 02:29:

quote:
Originally posted by UWM
For one, who am I looking down on?

I didn't like this song the first time I heard it months before it was being played out, and I still don't. It does nothing for me. It's gimmicky on purpose. Sure it's mastered and mixed fine, but so what? You can't polish a turd.

Oh, and nice one calling out the hating for it being popular. That's always a classic response.


you get old acting like that doesn't exist too.

and this is what i was talking about...

quote:
Originally posted by UWM
Harold you know better than to defend rubbish like this.


Posted by UWM on Aug-17-2006 02:35:

So if I tell you the SHM sound is old and played-out, does that mean that I'm hating on it because it's popular, or am I simply stating my personal opinion?


Posted by kush paintings on Aug-17-2006 02:39:

quote:
Originally posted by Phortastic
Like being said before in this thread: it's repetitive and it goes NOWHERE.


I think that too is a poor arguement. I agree, it doesn't go anywhere, but thank god for djs and their ability to make 2 hours+ of music sound like one track. Put in the proper place and edited down to <3 minutes and I think you have a nice track towards the beggining of a set or mix. Now, I think it is a terrible starter, but I think that's a given. You want something to pull you in, to interest you, while being "safe". That is at least my opinion when it comes to opening tracks.

Now, don't get me wrong. I am not a defender of this track. I saw how high it was on beatport and was shocked. But, as I said before I see how it could play a nice role in a mix, while I think you'd have to be on something to think it'd really shine.

Oh, and by the way, a bit off topic, but as far as opening tracks go I really think Dirty South- Get Down would be a sick opener, at least if you are heading in the electro direction, while leaving yourself open for some Marine Party (Freelands label, do I have the name right?) type stuff.


Posted by iammesol on Aug-17-2006 02:42:

quote:
Originally posted by UWM
So if I tell you the SHM sound is old and played-out, does that mean that I'm hating on it because it's popular, or am I simply stating my personal opinion?


no... it means you're not paying attention to Eric Prydz. Other than him you're right


Posted by UWM on Aug-17-2006 03:05:

quote:
Originally posted by iammesol
no... it means you're not paying attention to Eric Prydz. Other than him you're right


I don't lump him in with them


Posted by iammesol on Aug-17-2006 03:07:

I don't consider algebra math


Posted by UWM on Aug-17-2006 03:10:

A more apt analogy would be to say that you don't lump Biophysical Thermodynamics in with undergraduate science courses. Granted, the course is offered at the undergraduate level, however in both difficulty and scope it is far above and beyond all other courses and, as such, it's inclusion in the undergraduate sciences is simply a technicality, though not pragmatic.


Posted by iammesol on Aug-17-2006 03:12:

*agrees*

See, I enjoy you when you aren't lazy with your posting


Pages (6): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.