TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- POLL: Should the Internet be policed by a regulatory body?
Pages (2): « 1 [2]

quote:

Originally posted by dallastar it should be YES, but it never will be! YES b/c of *pedophiles

Ok. Just what percentage does pedophiles make up of internet users? Very, very, very fraction of 1 percent?

So you're in favour of restricting everyone else's privacy so that the police can go after that very fraction of 1 percent of sickos?

Needs of many outweigh the needs of few in this case, no?

quote:

Originally posted by EvilTree Ok. Just what percentage does pedophiles make up of internet users? Very, very, very fraction of 1 percent? So you're in favour of restricting everyone else's privacy so that the police can go after that very fraction of 1 percent of sickos? Needs of many outweigh the needs of few in this case, no?

I suppose you can think no to that but what I was mostly talking about was children pretors , that is more like what I was aiming at - haven't you seen that DATELINE special thats on every couple of weeks/months where these fukkin creeps talking over the internet to a supposed 14 year old on myspace website and these creepy men that show up to the girls house with condoms in their pockets, beer & liquor (when she is supposedly underage?), and other things such as pornography..ect. There is absoultly no way that they internet could EVER be monitored. The concept is just not feasible in any regard.

I recently saw on CTV on Septemeber 11th night news that there are so many conspircy theories on the net too, for example the recently the 9/11, people where claiming that the USA was behind the terrorist attacks. Which I think that's complete bullshit - and supposedly 1 out of 5 americans believe it! that's what ultimatly astounded me!

Anyways, it's can't be done, but it would be nice if it could be... Who knows what the freakin' net will be like in 2016? I can't wait to see........

We need less regulation of the internet, not more. What we need more of is PLUR.


Please don't mix regulation of the internet (ideas) with airport security; they're very different issues .

quote:

Originally posted by ShadoWolf . What we need more of is PLUR.

I think that's why I am here! hey shadoWolf!

quote:

Originally posted by dallastar I recently saw on CTV on Septemeber 11th night news that there are so many conspircy theories on the net too, for example the recently the 9/11, people where claiming that the USA was behind the terrorist attacks. Which I think that's complete bullshit - and supposedly 1 out of 5 americans believe it! that's what ultimatly astounded me!

Don't put too much faith in polls.

I bet ya if you run a poll with a question 'do you believe Bush fucked Ghandi in the ass' 6% will say yes.

Dallas, are you implying that people coming up with conspiracy theories shouldn't be allowed to do so?

quote:

Originally posted by Cosmic Fur Dallas, are you implying that people coming up with conspiracy theories shouldn't be allowed to do so?

not at all -

quote:

Originally posted by EvilTree Don't put too much faith in polls. I bet ya if you run a poll with a question 'do you believe Bush fucked Ghandi in the ass' 6% will say yes.

HAHA

quote:

Originally posted by dallastar not at all -

Then I'm missing the point of the whole story about 1/5 americans believing the 9/11 conspiracy theory

quote:

Originally posted by Cosmic Fur Then I'm missing the point of the whole story about 1/5 americans believing the 9/11 conspiracy theory

I said I watched it on CTV apart of the newscast that evening on sept 11th.... anyways, I never said any personal comment on any conspiracy theory, i just think it's bullshit that american government had anything to do with the terrorist attacks on Sept 11th... that's all, people can think what ever theories they want and post them on the net with videos/photo's/ect and the internet can not monitor these activities....

THE END

[[ LINK REMOVED ]]

quote:

Originally posted by EvilTree Ok. Just what percentage does pedophiles make up of internet users? Very, very, very fraction of 1 percent? So you're in favour of restricting everyone else's privacy so that the police can go after that very fraction of 1 percent of sickos?

Agree.

quote:

Originally posted by Jem_hadar Agree.

*sticking out my tongue!*

Hahah, fucking internet police TOOT TOOT

quote:

Originally posted by VERTiG0 Hahah, fucking internet police TOOT TOOT

sweetapples.

watch this

/off topic - as per usual!heheh
9/11 video

I think that certain things should be policed. There are a lot of problems with child porn, chat room pedophiles, hackers, bomb recipes, etc. I believe that we all have a right to freedom, but when someone's life is at risk, that is where the line needs to be drawn. HOWEVER, after the previous statements, I also think that people will still do what they want - internet or no internet. If someone wants to go and bomb a school - they will find a way to do it. It's just that they will have to work harder to find their information. We still have libraries. It's not like those will ever be policed.

The internet is not the actual problem - it's the people who choose to use it for illegal acts.

Okay guys now you tell me who is going to check every one of the hundreds of billions of webpages out there for content!

quote:

Originally posted by VERTiG0 Okay guys now you tell me who is going to check every one of the hundreds of billions of webpages out there for content!

no one will!

quote:

Originally posted by dallastar no one will!

Okay thanks for the prompt reply!

quote:

Originally posted by dallastar no one will!

exactly. This would be wayyy too difficult, because there are just too many sites to regulate. The government should save their time, money, and effort, and tackle the actual problems in the world.

quote:

Originally posted by VERTiG0 Okay guys now you tell me who is going to check every one of the hundreds of billions of webpages out there for content!

http://www.miibeian.gov.cn/

http://www.baic.gov.cn/

quote:

Originally posted by me@t k@tie exactly. This would be wayyy too difficult, because there are just too many sites to regulate. The government should save their time, money, and effort, and tackle the actual problems in the world.

They got computers to filter through sites looking for specific contents. Just like scanning through billions of emails for specific words.

quote:

Originally posted by VERTiG0 Okay thanks for the prompt reply!

Your welcome...

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.