TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- What would you prefer?
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »


Posted by Protege on Sep-21-2006 01:57:

which ever one has the biggest cock


Posted by Ygrene on Sep-21-2006 01:57:

I say B.

I would become a professor at Harvard, teaching an 8-bit Nintendo class.


Posted by tubularbills on Sep-21-2006 01:59:

quote:
Originally posted by Temperate
B) the most intelligent, because eventually you'll find someone who will love you for who you are.


B.S.


Posted by Marc Summers on Sep-21-2006 01:59:

quote:
Originally posted by Ygrene
I say B.

I would become a professor at Harvard, teaching an 8-bit Nintendo class.


ygrenes can i talk to you on msn?!


Posted by Aquarian on Sep-21-2006 02:00:

Re: Re: Re: What would you prefer?

quote:
Originally posted by Omega_M
Now I call that pompousness more than anything else.


I was afraid someone would misunderstand that. It's in fact quite the opposite. I don't consider myself better than anyone else. What I mean by that is that other people perceive it this way, and that it often causes resentment and frustration. From an early age I'd been going to special schools for 'gifted' kids, then onto special high school programs, had grades usually ranging between 95-100%, learned everything super fast, learned english in a few weeks... This kind of stuff is always associated with a positive connotation. When describing it, people would say that I'm "better" at learning, or "more intelligent", but those things are all highly relative. Intelligence is pretty much a meaningless word in this context. At most, it's a measure of normality. In other words, you could say that I processed school differently than most people, but using a word like "better" would be highly subjective. Efficiency or rapidity isn't always a good thing.

While they were all praising my "abilities", I was wishing more than anything else that I could just be like everyone else. I don't want to go through my whole life story here (and I doubt any of you would be interested in reading it), but let's just say that almost nothing but negative has come out of it. Unless you'd lived in my shoes, you'd never understand all the shit that it's made me go through.


Posted by R_Bass on Sep-21-2006 03:06:

this is intresting to ponder. I would choose intelligence over beauty. Beauty is also in the eye of the beholder. Intelligence adds to character which is the context within a books covers.


Posted by Slylee on Sep-21-2006 03:15:

becoming pretty is attainable these days with the right amount of money that you could certainly earn from having brains...so i chose brains.


Posted by R_Bass on Sep-21-2006 03:19:

quote:
Originally posted by Slylee
becoming pretty is attainable these days with the right amount of money that you could certainly earn from having brains...so i chose brains.


It all depends on your definition of pretty i would guess


Posted by Slylee on Sep-21-2006 03:23:

well i mean i think of "ugly" and i think of overweight, fashionably challanged, maybe a big nose and dull skin and nappy hair.


all of that can be fixed. that was my point.


Posted by R_Bass on Sep-21-2006 03:39:

In general i would say thats a sound assumption. Tastes do vary though and its a good thing that everyone isnt attracted to the same type of guy or type of girl.


Posted by Ivand on Sep-21-2006 03:51:

beauty is a curse in this world..


Posted by occrider on Sep-21-2006 05:42:

Why do you make the distinction between actually being the most attractive or the most intelligent as opposed to being regarded as being the most attractive or intelligent? The way I see it, with the latter people are going to always pick their weak spots because why enhance a strength that they're already comfortable with particularly since it doesn't actually enhance the strength but enhances how others percieve you?


Posted by Clovis on Sep-21-2006 05:45:

I'd like to be the most attractive.


And go to college. ZING!


Posted by 604trancejunkie on Sep-21-2006 06:51:

beauty is a curse on the world. it keeps us from seeing who the real monsters are.


Posted by Salegon on Sep-21-2006 11:33:

quote:
Originally posted by occrider
Why do you make the distinction between actually being the most attractive or the most intelligent as opposed to being regarded as being the most attractive or intelligent? The way I see it, with the latter people are going to always pick their weak spots because why enhance a strength that they're already comfortable with particularly since it doesn't actually enhance the strength but enhances how others percieve you?


I intentionally put the question the way I did it.

Being regarded the most beautiful person and being the most beautiful person is not the same imho, because

a) if you are the most beautiful human of the world, most people will recognize this as a simple fact but there will still be a couple of folks who don't think that since beauty lies in the eye of the beholder.
If you are seen as the most beautiful guy/girl everybody will accept you as the most beautiful human without any exceptions.

b) Now just think about yourself. How would the fact, that you're the most beautiful human in the world influence you?
On the other hand, what would happen if you were the same person as you are now, but everybody else in the world considered you to be the most beautiful?
These are two different things, that would both effect your ego. As time goes by, these influences would devide and change parts of your character.

c) this is a question-involved thing. I didn't want you to think about a transformation of yourself. The way I put the question, the view on you of everyone else in the world has changed, nothing more.

For example, if you are thought to be the most intelligent human of the world, there would be the same amount of people that are more intelligent than you such as it is today. But concerning you, people had a blockade so that they would't be able to reject any of your decisions since they honestly think it's the most intelligent way/solution/suggestions you make(because it's originating from you).


So much for this - I listed the situation as I see it above - now I seriously have to study some more shitty biochemistry or I'll fail at the upcoming exam.


Posted by Slylee on Sep-21-2006 13:55:

quote:
Originally posted by R_Bass
In general i would say thats a sound assumption. Tastes do vary though and its a good thing that everyone isnt attracted to the same type of guy or type of girl.


ok so "by society's standards" then...better?


Posted by Slylee on Sep-21-2006 13:55:

quote:
Originally posted by occrider
Why do you make the distinction between actually being the most attractive or the most intelligent as opposed to being regarded as being the most attractive or intelligent? The way I see it, with the latter people are going to always pick their weak spots because why enhance a strength that they're already comfortable with particularly since it doesn't actually enhance the strength but enhances how others percieve you?



because actually being the "most attractive" is impossible.


Posted by all-nite-freak on Sep-21-2006 13:56:

id want to be ugly and hung like ron jeremy


Posted by Danny Ocean on Sep-21-2006 14:06:

quote:
Originally posted by all-nite-freak
id want to be ugly and hung like ron jeremy


i'de suggest john holmes instead. althugh he was a crack addict who ended his porn career doing gay films until he finally died of aids..it's rumored he fucked around 5 thousand girls though.


Posted by all-nite-freak on Sep-21-2006 14:09:

john holmes will be remembered as a an hiv junkie with a huge cock.
ron jeremy will remembered being a fat hedgehog looking ****** with a huge cock.
come on
which one is cooler?
i want to be remembered as a huge cock too


edit...all this talk about cock has inspired me to go to tim hortons for a chicken sammich....score


Posted by Danny Ocean on Sep-21-2006 14:13:

i think that if your cock is big enough to please whomever you're pleasing at the time, thats good enough.
personally, if i can get my girl to walk funny for a day, i think i've done my part.


Posted by all-nite-freak on Sep-21-2006 14:28:

quote:
Originally posted by Danny Ocean
i think that if your cock is big enough to please whomever you're pleasing at the time, thats good enough.
personally, if i can get my girl to walk funny for a day, i think i've done my part.


stop trying to take anything serious out of my posts.
i just use ta as a therapy technique for my tourettes.
big cocks and donkey nipples are all i can discuss online.

edit:if i could get your girl to walk funny for a day, i think i've done my part too


Posted by Slylee on Sep-21-2006 14:28:

even though a big dick is nice, i certainly wouldn't chose it over looks/personality.

i dont care how well you're hung. if you look like ron jeremy, i wouldn't touch you with a 10 ft pole.


Posted by all-nite-freak on Sep-21-2006 14:30:

quote:
Originally posted by Slylee
even though a big dick is nice, i certainly wouldn't chose it over looks/personality.

i dont care how well you're hung. if you look like ron jeremy, i wouldn't touch you with a 10 ft pole.


i just wanna be ugly to know how it feels


Posted by Danny Ocean on Sep-21-2006 14:40:

quote:
Originally posted by all-nite-freak


edit:if i could get your girl to walk funny for a day, i think i've done my part too


a little farfetched after claiming multiple times about your 3 inches of manhood.


Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.