An Atheist's Worst Nightmare: The Banana

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- An Atheist's Worst Nightmare: The Banana
Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Posted by Renegade on Nov-10-2006 13:04:

quote:
Originally posted by Krypton
This entire thread is lashing out against religion, by the very group of people (naturalist) who claim to be open-minded. What I'm getting at is this; the bashing will lead to hatred, which stems from close-mindedness. That's my criticism.

This thread isn't about bashing religion, it's about subjecting an absurd and extreme theistic argument to the ridicule it clearly deserves. That doesn't make us closed-minded, it makes us sane people with a sense of humour.

As for the video itself, it's a perfect example of Poe's Law in reverse:

quote:
"Without the use of a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is impossible to make a parody of Fundamentalism that someone won't mistake for the real thing."

If you were going to make a parody video of YEC beliefs, you couldn't have done a much better job than this.

Posted by Lilith on Nov-10-2006 20:08:

Exactly, if someone told me it was a Monty Python skit with the synopis being-
Two Church ministers
A banana
You'd start with the assumption its probably going too be some blue satire about grown men fondling a banana on TV as proof of god, then throw in some one liners like 'so it doesnt squirt on your face'

That just had me in hysterics!

Even moreso too watch it twice and go... oh my goodness... theyre actually serious!

Its comedy gold!

Posted by Dj Tomer on Nov-10-2006 23:08:

quote:
Originally posted by Krypton
I don't believe in Santa Claus

But you believe in god?

And don't you agree that this is an arrogant argument, claiming that god created the banana just for us? What about monkeys? They eat them way more than we do, and they peel the banana THE OTHER WAY.

This is typical theistic thinking in trying to disprove evolution. They use the scientific principle that if you can provide 1 example to disprove a theory, you disprove it entirely. Meaning that if you can find 1 thing in nature that cannot be explained by natural selection or evolution, you pretty much just shot down both theories. They've been trying to do this for years. And scientists will openly agree that if such an example is to be found, evolution is wrong.

However, the theists never take the same standards to their beliefs, refusing to admit that there might even be a slight chance that god does not exist. And instead of using the same scientific method they apply to evolution, choose to use the "you can't prove it wrong so it must be true" argument. Whenever science shows us a fact that disagrees with religious beliefs, the theists just ignore it or try to refute it with their own counter-studies, instead of saying "you make a good point, perhaps I'll reconsider my thesis"

Now, who's more close minded? The person who openly admits he doesn't have all the answers and works day and night to find out the truth? Or the one who claims to know it all, and fights to the death (sadly all too often) with those who disagree?

Pages (2): « 1 [2]