TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- how do you get the pro sound?
Pages (5): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 »


Posted by Krispy Kreme on Dec-04-2006 09:12:

quote:
Originally posted by kitphillips
Haha , This is a funny thread, Krispy you've been round here a while, you know what happens when people ask this question. You know as well as we all do that there's no such thing as a "pro sound"! Why don't you post whatever track you're getting frustrated with and we can try adn give you some more specific advice.


hehe your right, I am guilty of asking such a question....however I guess I would just like to know a few tips here and there maybe could help out. Like I said .. it doesnt have to do with the software stuff. I already pushed Logic to its limits... i think there is something more to it. I really believe to get that phat warm in your face UMPPHHH , there is something behind it and was hoping someone could put a tip or two to get to that point.

Let me explain. To get the "pro sound" it is not just eq compressing etc. It is something you do ... some type of processing to make you FEEL the music , not just hear it. It makes the sound come 3d , and jump out. It make you visualize as if the kick was right in your face and fill up the whole room instead of just a flat sounding kick.. There is a secret behind it , i just dont know what it is yet


Posted by Krispy Kreme on Dec-04-2006 09:13:

Re: Re: how do you get the pro sound?

quote:
Originally posted by echosystm
what the fuck kind of question is this?



Its a good question. Some people can make decent tunes however they cannot get THAT sound. So the question is how do you get THAT sound


Posted by Krispy Kreme on Dec-04-2006 09:21:

Its something else other than just eq and clean mixing. All my mixes are so clean.. WAY too clean.. it sounds way to digital and cold. You hear those pro songs, all the tracks are like glued together its hard to explain.


Posted by Krispy Kreme on Dec-04-2006 09:22:

quote:
Originally posted by Craig Bradley
not really helpful is it...

anyway mate it's all down to how you mix the tune make sure each element has it's own frequency space in the field and doesn't clash with any other elements ie (eq) . make sure you find or make sounds which fit nice together, also down to volume levels aswell make sure you get your volume levels right if this is wrong it can sound shite anyway. Compression is not always important i think tunes are too compressed these days but thats my personal opionion i think levels is the main issue.




ya man, i think mixdown is the key


Posted by Pjotr G on Dec-04-2006 09:58:

quote:
Originally posted by Krispy Kreme

Let me explain. To get the "pro sound" it is not just eq compressing etc. It is something you do ... some type of processing to make you FEEL the music , not just hear it. It makes the sound come 3d , and jump out. It make you visualize as if the kick was right in your face and fill up the whole room instead of just a flat sounding kick.. There is a secret behind it , i just dont know what it is yet


What do you expect to hear here? That there turns out to be some secret kept module you can only get if you are a pro, and makes your "sound" better?

1. Crappy mix
2. Professionalizer rack unit
3. Profit!


You are right, it's not just eq compressing etc. It's MIXING, eq, compressing etc. In that order.


Posted by richg101 on Dec-04-2006 10:30:

i used to think it was all about the hardware. and sure, a more powerful synth might add power to the mix, but an ok mix with hardware will be overshadowed by a great mix using just soft synths.

i wish i knew what it was that the pro's do that i dont, but im noticing that you can cram a hell of a lot more sound into the 0.0db level than i originally thought. and this is starting to make my productions sound better.


Posted by Pjotr G on Dec-04-2006 10:34:

or louder?


Posted by Krispy Kreme on Dec-04-2006 10:52:

quote:
Originally posted by richg101
i used to think it was all about the hardware. and sure, a more powerful synth might add power to the mix, but an ok mix with hardware will be overshadowed by a great mix using just soft synths.

i wish i knew what it was that the pro's do that i dont, but im noticing that you can cram a hell of a lot more sound into the 0.0db level than i originally thought. and this is starting to make my productions sound better.


ya, it is weird, I compare meters and my music is actually louder than the pros, but does not feel / hear that way.


Posted by Derivative on Dec-04-2006 11:05:

quote:
Originally posted by Krispy Kreme
ya, it is weird, I compare meters and my music is actually louder than the pros, but does not feel / hear that way.


Please don't tell me thats the only dimension you think of in terms of sound design...because if it is, its no wonder you are having problems...


Posted by kitphillips on Dec-04-2006 11:39:

When you talk about the "glue" that holds the sound together, maybe what it is, is some distortion stuff they're running it through? Try running your synths into a guitar stompbox or something, maybe an old dodgy mixer way maxed out to distortion point? Get creative with it if you think your mixes are too perfect/sterile. Often distortion can add a hell of a lot to percieved loudness and the software stuff really makes me cringe so don't even think about it!

I know a lot of people are using external hardware for summing these days, and people have been using analogue stuff to get a more cohesive sound for ages but I'm a bit skeptical about all that stuff. I recomend you just find one or two bits of cheap hardware (preferably really bizzare and off the wall) and run some stuff through that. It might fix your problems.

Otherwise just listen to it 6 months or a year later and try and decide whether you were just being critical at the time, I do that a lot and discover that I was a genius a year ago and a fool now.


Posted by richg101 on Dec-04-2006 13:16:

quote:
Originally posted by Pjotr G
or louder?


i suppose. but i find my levels are peaking to the same they were originally yet the sound is a lot more full. i think the right compression after the mix has been tweeked really bonds the tracks together that extra bit. i wanna learn multiband compression soon.


Posted by thoughtlessjex on Dec-04-2006 14:32:

quote:
Originally posted by Derivative
Please don't tell me thats the only dimension you think of in terms of sound design...because if it is, its no wonder you are having problems...

+1

Good mixing is three dimensional. The dimensions are: panning, frequency and loudness.

First of all, the kick sounds in your face because it's the loudest element in the track. Compression can actually reduce this effect by making all of the sounds equally loud.

Second of all that "3d" effect is caused by using panning. Percussion never pans center, unless it's a kick. Effects also should have some stereo imaging thrown in.

Thirdly:
quote:
Its something else other than just eq and clean mixing. All my mixes are so clean.. WAY too clean.. it sounds way to digital and cold. You hear those pro songs, all the tracks are like glued together its hard to explain.

This is your answer. The idea of all of this is not to sound "clean" or cold, but to ensure that all elements are audible, and that they don't produce unwanted peaks.


Posted by Krispy Kreme on Dec-04-2006 14:59:

First, thx for all the replies and tips. I appreciate you guys are trying to help.

I guess here is my best example. The pro sound vs amatuer sound :

Pro sound : just the bass kick and snare alone (2 tracks) is thicker, wider, fuller, more umph... then my whole song put together.. The pro sound can rock a club just with a bass kick and snare. Its not only thumping to the ears but also feels good listening to it to.

Now how is this possible?

here are some things I know is NOT the secret to achieve this sound.

1) Layering. I layer the shit out of my stuff... yes it feels thicker, yes it makes it sound better. but it still doesnt sound the same.

2) EQ. Ok I will boost the low freq maybe 90 hz or something to give it some ass. Hell maybe boost 3-5K to give it more prescence. Ah shit this still doesnt do it.

3) Take the bottom of one kick , and take the top of another kick, compress them together, run them through distortion. This sounds cool... But fuck the pro sound is still kicking my ass.

4) Even if i make the kick sound decent it still doesnt feel good to listen to like the pro tracks. Listen to your favorite songs... they not only sound good but feel good when you listen to it. I think analog is the key here..

You see.. it is not that I dont try, I try many ways and still am missing that juice and magic. The pro sound have something that some of us dont have. I think I have some ideas on what may help. Im gonna try everyway possible because I am losing sleep over this. I will report back to you guys if i find out the key.


Posted by gr8ape on Dec-04-2006 15:59:

It all starts with the sounds you use
If the sounds you use dont sound crystal-fucking-clear-likeyouwantthemtobe, you wont have pro sound
Second, you have to put the right sounds together!
Thirdly, you song must have character, style, creativity


Posted by richg101 on Dec-04-2006 16:53:

the reason a kick/bass snare on their own work in a pro track is due to getting the three working together. the kick and bass are fucking the headroom for all they can get. the snare is at that particular perfect volume ratio to the bass and kick, good mixing and careful use of compression/sidechaining and eq will get even mediocre samples kicking. source some banging kick samples from one of the numerous sample sites. a good kick is more important than anything else imo.

then layer a warm bassline under it and keep tweeking those till you get your kick, snare and bass all working together.

to compress a kick you should use an attack of:-

*50-55ms for a slow warm kick
*45ms for an average trance kick
*20-40ms for an electro kick

release should be around the 20ms mark for all of them if i remember right.

threshold depends on the level of the kick sample you are using.


Posted by sterilis on Dec-04-2006 17:24:

the majority of times i dont compress my kicks as it sometimes loses the clarity of them. i only compress them if its really necessary.


Posted by Krispy Kreme on Dec-04-2006 18:01:

quote:
Originally posted by richg101
the reason a kick/bass snare on their own work in a pro track is due to getting the three working together. the kick and bass are fucking the headroom for all they can get. the snare is at that particular perfect volume ratio to the bass and kick, good mixing and careful use of compression/sidechaining and eq will get even mediocre samples kicking. source some banging kick samples from one of the numerous sample sites. a good kick is more important than anything else imo.

then layer a warm bassline under it and keep tweeking those till you get your kick, snare and bass all working together.

to compress a kick you should use an attack of:-

*50-55ms for a slow warm kick
*45ms for an average trance kick
*20-40ms for an electro kick

release should be around the 20ms mark for all of them if i remember right.

threshold depends on the level of the kick sample you are using.


awesome stuff man, i will try this out thanks !


Posted by Chronosis on Dec-04-2006 18:51:

A sample?


Posted by RickyM on Dec-05-2006 00:01:

Re: how do you get the pro sound?

quote:
Originally posted by Krispy Kreme
whats the secret?


Hold on...I just checked your studio, you have the most fucking awesome studio judging by the pics!
Perhaps shit loads of gear isn't the answer?


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Dec-05-2006 00:04:

More gear is always the answer!


Posted by Krispy Kreme on Dec-05-2006 06:35:

Re: Re: how do you get the pro sound?

quote:
Originally posted by RickyM
Hold on...I just checked your studio, you have the most fucking awesome studio judging by the pics!
Perhaps shit loads of gear isn't the answer?


bah, I actually dont have that much gear to be honest. I just have it set up nicely

Heres my stuff:

virus ti
jp 8080
midi keyboard
moniters


To be honest I dont even use the virus ti. The presets sound like ass and its hard as hell to make good sounds. Just to make a good sound you have to go through all that routing and crap . The waveforms sound so raw that doesnt help at all either, hence why I dont use it and have sold it. I will replace this with the lovely nord lead 2. The sounds from that thing are so round/bright/warm and easy to use.

So pretty much the only piece of hardware I have is the jp8080.
I know it is something more to it though. For example I use rb2k1 soundbank on the jp8080... it sounds great. I will add other fx to it, thicken it up even more, however the sound still cant compare to pro tracks.

Like i said before, half of it is the original sound, and i believe that the rest of it is how you get the most out of that sound. If anyone can get a pad to sound and feel as huge as Armin's pad (I will post an example) from just eq and plugins or whatever, I will bow down and call you god. It is literally impossible. How can you get that sound from all 1's and 0's. There is more to it.


Posted by Krispy Kreme on Dec-05-2006 06:54:

Check out arming van buuren - Sail.

At about 2 min 45 sec into the song (on the A State Of Trance cd 2,song 16) , there is the pad.

This is an example of the pro sound. There is that EXTRA something.

Im on my journey to find out the secrets


Posted by skot_e on Dec-05-2006 09:36:

Have you ever sent your stuff to a mastering engineer? I'm not talking someone who says they do mastering, I mean someone who has be doing it for 20 years (eg). i know that definately makes a difference to the final product. Hilltop Hoods (ozzie hip hop group) stuff sounded 'home made' till the mastering guys put their touch on it, went platinum with loads of airplay and awards in this country. Different genre I know, but you could say they are pro sound now.


Posted by RickyM on Dec-05-2006 09:46:

Re: Re: Re: how do you get the pro sound?

quote:
Originally posted by Krispy Kreme
bah, I actually dont have that much gear to be honest. I just have it set up nicely

Heres my stuff:

virus ti
jp 8080
midi keyboard
moniters


To be honest I dont even use the virus ti. The presets sound like ass and its hard as hell to make good sounds. Just to make a good sound you have to go through all that routing and crap . The waveforms sound so raw that doesnt help at all either, hence why I dont use it and have sold it. I will replace this with the lovely nord lead 2. The sounds from that thing are so round/bright/warm and easy to use.

So pretty much the only piece of hardware I have is the jp8080.
I know it is something more to it though. For example I use rb2k1 soundbank on the jp8080... it sounds great. I will add other fx to it, thicken it up even more, however the sound still cant compare to pro tracks.

Like i said before, half of it is the original sound, and i believe that the rest of it is how you get the most out of that sound. If anyone can get a pad to sound and feel as huge as Armin's pad (I will post an example) from just eq and plugins or whatever, I will bow down and call you god. It is literally impossible. How can you get that sound from all 1's and 0's. There is more to it.


How long have you been producing for? It really is just practice I think, there's no magical plugin or anything. Although a good mastering really will help.


Posted by Krispy Kreme on Dec-05-2006 10:57:

quote:
Originally posted by skot_e
Have you ever sent your stuff to a mastering engineer? I'm not talking someone who says they do mastering, I mean someone who has be doing it for 20 years (eg). i know that definately makes a difference to the final product. Hilltop Hoods (ozzie hip hop group) stuff sounded 'home made' till the mastering guys put their touch on it, went platinum with loads of airplay and awards in this country. Different genre I know, but you could say they are pro sound now.


I have never heard of them until now, i just checked out their website... its shwweet. I have actually never tried sending it to real professional mastering engineers before. I think this would definetly help. It doesnt matter what style music it is , could be hiphop or rock or trance. That pro sound is still the same.


Pages (5): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.