TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- I'm being forced to use a Xone92 tonight
Pages (2): « 1 [2]
| quote: |
| Originally posted by jupiterone Unless it's just my sub that isn't turned up  I feel the same way about my X:3D |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by moondog are you used to playing on a DJM 600 by any chance? I find them VERY bass heavy, often you cant even have the bass at 12 o'clock, otherwise it just sounds stupid |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by jupiterone Yep, the 600 and my old X1500 were very bassy |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by moondog sound quality on the xone 62 rocks, i can even tell the difference on my home system |
I hate all x0ne mixers except the 92. Faders, filters, EQ, and cueing are far superior on the 92 to the rest of the models (haven't used the 3D though).
4 band EQ threw me for a loop the first time I used it too, but I just move them at the same time when bringing a mix in.
Have fun with your gig Enjoy the mixer.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Chris Allen I hate all x0ne mixers except the 92. Faders, filters, EQ, and cueing are far superior on the 92 to the rest of the models (haven't used the 3D though). 4 band EQ threw me for a loop the first time I used it too, but I just move them at the same time when bringing a mix in. Have fun with your gig Enjoy the mixer. |
i love the pretty colours
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Caligula_37 i love the pretty colours |
The one thing I hate about Xone mixers is the curve on the upfader. It's not sharp enough for me.
Cheers
Nem
i mix exclusily (edit: NYE hangover) with the EQs so the curve doesnt bother me, although I agree it aint sharp enough
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ryan0751 The 92 has a button to select pre/post eq monitoring. |
You mean the Xone 62 I think? (not the 464?)
The Xone:92 is definately worth the extra cash:
- Much better cue'ing system, with pre/post EQ button, a cue/master knob (which you can "simulate" on the 62, but it's a pain).
- Two aux sends, instead of 1
- The faders on the 92 are like other DJ mixers, on the 62 they are studio style. This is up to you.
- The 92 has two completely separate filter units that aren't tied to the crossfader select controls. You also gain the separate LFO for each filter.
- More LED's for channel meters on the 92
On the 92 you lose:
- EQ on/off button
| quote: |
| Originally posted by montie Is this the only difference between the Xone 92 and the Xone 64? If not what are the other differences. I'm thinking about picking up a Xone mixer as I'm in the market for a new mixer. Is it worth the extra $300-$400 to get the 92? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ryan0751 You mean the Xone 62 I think? (not the 464?) The Xone:92 is definately worth the extra cash: - Much better cue'ing system, with pre/post EQ button, a cue/master knob (which you can "simulate" on the 62, but it's a pain). - Two aux sends, instead of 1 - The faders on the 92 are like other DJ mixers, on the 62 they are studio style. This is up to you. - The 92 has two completely separate filter units that aren't tied to the crossfader select controls. You also gain the separate LFO for each filter. - More LED's for channel meters on the 92 On the 92 you lose: - EQ on/off button |
)
I have the rotary 92 and I love it. Depending on what you mix its well worth it.
Re: I'm being forced to use a Xone92 tonight
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DOOMBOT Man this sucks... LOL But no, really, I've never used one before. That extra mid seems a bit intimidating.  |
Re: Re: I'm being forced to use a Xone92 tonight
| quote: |
| Originally posted by chris harrington its a tough life |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.