TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Chavez threat to seize food shops
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »


Posted by Magnetonium on Feb-16-2007 18:18:

quote:
Originally posted by tathi
ive met quite a few Venezualans in South America so far and i plan to visit the country after i spend a few months in Colombia, every Venezualan ive met HATES Chavez (these are the people who can afford to travel in south american countries outside of Venezuala) it just goes to show how polarised the country is, in the provinces and in the slums of Caracas im sure ill meet people who idolise the man.


Chavez was democractically elected by over 62% of people who voted. I guess by that analogy you can see the state of the country - the rich hate him, the poor love him, and there at least a 60% poverty rate there, partially credited to Chavez and mainly to his predecessors. And oil-rich country when there's a lot of poor people ... thats been an issue for Venezuela for so many years now, long before Chavez ....


Posted by LazFX on Feb-16-2007 18:25:

quote:
Originally posted by Magnetonium


Chavez was democractically elected by over 62% of people who voted. ....


yeah, we get that point mate. you have beaten that horse past the point.


Posted by LazFX on Feb-16-2007 18:27:

quote:
Originally posted by MisterOpus1






Sorry, too much coffee this morning......


Too much wine for me mate!

Read me Reviews, ha ha ha


Posted by Fir3start3r on Feb-17-2007 03:01:

Remember: Its not communism, its Chavism!

How it works...


Posted by LazFX on Feb-17-2007 03:07:

quote:
Originally posted by Fir3start3r
Remember: Its not communism, its Chavism!

How it works...



Pavlov's Dog would be proud!!


Posted by Magnetonium on Feb-17-2007 06:58:

quote:
Originally posted by LazFX
yeah, we get that point mate. you have beaten that horse past the point.


Yes, the point is that Venezuelan people chose communism, not democracy. Chaves is no democrat. His platform in 1998 involved rewriting the constitution. Read my previous posts over ... there are not good choices for Venezuelan people, because the fight for political domination continues!


Posted by Aquadyne on Feb-17-2007 17:45:

quote:
Originally posted by Magnetonium


Yes, the point is that Venezuelan people chose communism, not democracy. Chaves is no democrat. His platform in 1998 involved rewriting the constitution. Read my previous posts over ... there are not good choices for Venezuelan people, because the fight for political domination continues!


Communism and democracy are not mutually exclusive. Theoretically, it is possible to have both at the same time.

However, don't let me interrupt you talking out of your ass though.


Posted by Magnetonium on Feb-17-2007 20:42:

quote:
Originally posted by Aquadyne
Communism and democracy are not mutually exclusive. Theoretically, it is possible to have both at the same time.

However, don't let me interrupt you talking out of your ass though.


Stop trying to wretch theory on actual events. In theory communism is supposed to be perfect, right? Well, well, in YOUR DREAMS is it possible to have BOTH at the same time. Everything is possible, but thats not the point here, the point here is whats happening. You're the one interrupting my thoughts by talking out of your own ass ;-)


Posted by Aquadyne on Feb-17-2007 21:09:

Yeah, it's comments like these...

quote:
Yes, the point is that Venezuelan people chose communism, not democracy


That make me realize that you have no idea for the most part of what you're talking about.

You are equating an economic system with a political system.

Democracy is a form of government
Communism is an economics system.

Learn to tell the difference.


Posted by Magnetonium on Feb-17-2007 21:27:

quote:
Originally posted by Aquadyne
Yeah, it's comments like these...



That make me realize that you have no idea for the most part of what you're talking about.

You are equating an economic system with a political system.

Democracy is a form of government
Communism is an economics system.

Learn to tell the difference.


Chavez changed the constitution to make him able to do these things in his 1998 election. Chavez is no democrat. He is a communist, and judging by being inspired by communist revolutionaries, he intends to create a communist union to fight against American domination.

He is doing it both economically, and politically.


Posted by Aquadyne on Feb-17-2007 21:38:

He's a social democrat, sparky.

Proving once again, that democracy and principles of communism/socialism are not mutually exclusive


Posted by Magnetonium on Feb-17-2007 21:45:

quote:
Originally posted by Aquadyne
He's a social democrat, sparky.

Proving once again, that democracy and principles of communism/socialism are not mutually exclusive


So, you're saying that you never expected or anticipated that Chavez would do this??? You didnt think he would nationalize the industries, corporations? That was his campaign, to shut down America's influence in his country. Aimed against the rich and foreign powers like USA. Thats not very democratic now, is it?


Posted by Sunsnail on Feb-17-2007 21:57:

I think you're confusing Capitalism with Democracy there.


Posted by Aquadyne on Feb-17-2007 22:01:

quote:
Originally posted by Magnetonium


So, you're saying that you never expected or anticipated that Chavez would do this??? You didnt think he would nationalize the industries, corporations? That was his campaign, to shut down America's influence in his country. Aimed against the rich and foreign powers like USA. Thats not very democratic now, is it?


I can't make sense of your insane ramblings, you crazy hobo. You'll have to clarify what you are trying to say.


Posted by Magnetonium on Feb-17-2007 22:02:

quote:
Originally posted by Sunsnail
I think you're confusing Capitalism with Democracy there.


Capitalism and democracy go hand in hand in the Western world ;-) Capitalism is the freedom and right to make your own fortune or something like that. Attack on capitalism would look like an attack on freedom, attack on democracy ;-)


Posted by Magnetonium on Feb-17-2007 22:06:

quote:
Originally posted by Aquadyne
I can't make sense of your insane ramblings, you crazy hobo. You'll have to clarify what you are trying to say.


My point is:

Did you expect Chavez when elected to nationalize, close monopolies, corporations and foreign (primary American) influence in Venezuela? His campaign is aimed against the rich, against the American-backed forces.

Now ask yourself - if he made such vows during the election campaign, why do you whine about Chavez attacking "democracy"? Chavez' attempt to do his "reforms" and policies like in this food shops case, is no different than passing Patriot Act in United States - thats an attack on democracy.


Posted by Aquadyne on Feb-17-2007 22:14:

quote:
Originally posted by Magnetonium


Capitalism and democracy go hand in hand in the Western world ;-) Capitalism is the freedom and right to make your own fortune or something like that. Attack on capitalism would look like an attack on freedom, attack on democracy ;-)


LOL, I am making this into my sig. Comedy gold.


Posted by Aquadyne on Feb-17-2007 22:34:

quote:
Originally posted by Magnetonium


My point is:

Did you expect Chavez when elected to nationalize, close monopolies, corporations and foreign (primary American) influence in Venezuela? His campaign is aimed against the rich, against the American-backed forces.

Now ask yourself - if he made such vows during the election campaign, why do you whine about Chavez attacking "democracy"? Chavez' attempt to do his "reforms" and policies like in this food shops case, is no different than passing Patriot Act in United States - thats an attack on democracy.


Settle down.

All I did was point out that communism and democracy are not mutually exclusive, because you seem to think that they are. Actually, if you think about states that seem to be the most prosperous and best places to live in, it is typically states with a high socialism component integrated into their political system.

For example, here's a list of top 10 states to live in according to survey by The Economist

1 Ireland
2 Switzerland
3 Norway
4 Luxembourg
5 Sweden
6 Australia
7 Iceland
8 Italy
9 Denmark
10 Spain


See what I mean?

Anyways, you seem to be highly agitated and incoherent today, did you forget to take your meds or something? Looking out for you, buddy.


Posted by Magnetonium on Feb-17-2007 22:40:

quote:
Originally posted by Aquadyne
Settle down.

All I did was point out that communism and democracy are not mutually exclusive, because you seem to think that they are. Actually, if you think about states that seem to be the most prosperous and best places to live in, it is typically states with a high socialism component integrated into their political system.

For example, here's a list of top 10 states to live in according to survey by The Economist

1 Ireland
2 Switzerland
3 Norway
4 Luxembourg
5 Sweden
6 Australia
7 Iceland
8 Italy
9 Denmark
10 Spain


See what I mean?

Anyways, you seem to be highly agitated and incoherent today, did you forget to take your meds or something? Looking out for you, buddy.


Man, you are gold. You are comparing European countries that have for decades been stable politically and in most cases economically as well to an unstable Venezuela. Venezuela is no such country to match your criteria, I dont know where you get the statistics making Venezuela similar to the mentioned prosperous European countries. There was no such thing as democracy in Venezuela, otherwise leaders would not rewrite constitution every 10 years, gun down protester crowds and vow to crush America's influence, or suspend the Constitution as a pro-American "democratic" dictator in Venezuela did in 1989 to suppress public protests. Venezuela's system, economic and political status of the last three decades is nowhere near that of its European counterparts. Did Italy suspend its Constitution in last month's massive football riots in Sicily?


Posted by Aquadyne on Feb-17-2007 23:01:

quote:
Man, you are gold. You are comparing European countries that have for decades been stable politically and in most cases economically as well to an unstable Venezuela. Venezuela is no such country to match your criteria, I dont know where you get the statistics making Venezuela similar to the mentioned prosperous European countries. There was no such thing as democracy in Venezuela, otherwise leaders would not rewrite constitution every 10 years, gun down protester crowds and vow to crush America's influence, or suspend the Constitution as a pro-American "democratic" dictator in Venezuela did in 1989 to suppress public protests. Venezuela's system, economic and political status of the last three decades is nowhere near that of its European counterparts. Did Italy suspend its Constitution in last month's massive football riots in Sicily?


I wasn't saying that, though I would gladly make that comparison. What I was saying is that you seem to think that:

Communism and Democracy are diametrically opposed. They are not and I provided examples where not only principles of socialism and democracy function, but also examples where they function so well as to provide some of the best living environments in the world.

Furthermore, Chavez isn't a communist, he is a social democrat. This is fairly evident by the fact that he uses government funds to subsidize a ton of services not only for his own people, but even for people in other countries (such as heating oil for low income families in US)


Posted by Magnetonium on Feb-18-2007 20:34:

quote:
Originally posted by Aquadyne
Furthermore, Chavez isn't a communist, he is a social democrat. This is fairly evident by the fact that he uses government funds to subsidize a ton of services not only for his own people, but even for people in other countries (such as heating oil for low income families in US)


Uh oh ... so I guess even the communist leaders afte WW2, who gaves trillions of dollars in money, food, arms to their friends around the world, and who actually had within their own borders free education, hospital care and such and such also fall into this category?


Posted by Aquadyne on Feb-18-2007 21:07:

quote:
Originally posted by Magnetonium


Uh oh ... so I guess even the communist leaders afte WW2, who gaves trillions of dollars in money, food, arms to their friends around the world, and who actually had within their own borders free education, hospital care and such and such also fall into this category?


Depending which communist leaders you're referring to. Not everything is as absolute as you'd like to believe. In my opinion, China right now is pretty much communist in name only, some states are practicing extreme forms of Stalinism like North Korea. But that's another topic altogether.

However, in Venezuela there is private enterprise and private corporations in Venezuela as well elections - so comparing them to communist states is not only unfair, but also inaccurate.

Government controls key industries that are vital to the survival of the state, private enterprise picks up slack elsewhere. What's wrong with that?


Posted by Q5echo on Feb-18-2007 22:32:

quote:
Originally posted by Magnetonium
Uh oh ... so I guess even the communist leaders afte WW2, who gaves trillions of dollars in money, food, arms to their friends around the world


yeah that was called Communist imperialism. again, you've managed to conflate two distinct arguments and now on your way to a third defending Chavez it seems like.

BTW Venezuela's inflation rate at this moment is 18.4%, thats about standard for a post-war communist state.


Posted by Aquadyne on Feb-18-2007 22:35:

That inflation rate is largely due to introducing mass credit purchasing into Venezuela in the past 2 years.

Purchase of automobiles by Venezuelans were up 70% in 2006, I believe.

It's a trade off. Inflation will stabilize, bolstered by petro-dollars but an introduction of credit purchasing into Venezuelan society is a massive milestone.


Posted by Q5echo on Feb-18-2007 23:03:

his set price controls on petroleum domestically, how does that stifle inflation?

and he is in the process of overvaluing his currency IMO
>link< in an effort control inflation.


oh, you probably mean he'll make up his petro-dollar losses domestically from his exports?


Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.