TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- USA - New York
-- t r a n c e
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »


Posted by Blake on Feb-26-2007 03:11:

quote:
Originally posted by steven-neil
swirling strings cheesy hooks and obvious choice of notes......computerised bullshit is what it is....press the demo button on any synth and you get trance......


So then what kinda stuff do you listen to? I feel like I've been in the minority here ever since I kinda stepped away from trance late last year. No one ever seems to know about the producers I mention. One of 'em is right on the cover of this month's BPM magazine:



There are at least 10 more sick indie label producers featured in this issue as well. Its refreshing to hear producers who are innovative enough to blend and blur the lines between music genres, and kinda mix things up so that their sounds aren't so predictable.


My bad, Colibri, for not keeping with the topic. As far as what I like about 'good trance', I'd have to go with the high energy. I'm not sure I've heard music that's more uplifting, or that has more potential to be uplifting/euphoric than some good bangin' trance. Moreover, it takes after the origins of trance in music in India circa 1700 AD when musicians held Sitar concerts, sometimes for a few days straight. The Sitar, being the only instrument, if I'm not mistaken, that can play an infinite number of pitches, was able to produce the melodic, but repetative (and sometimes droning) sounds that kept the audience and even some of the musicians in an almost meditative state for hours on end.



'Trance' as far as modern music is concerned, of course, referrs to the amount of repetition there is of specific sounds or beats in each track. Interestingly, steady repetition mimics what a person's brain waves do when they're asleep (a sort of mental reset button if you will). With trance music, it's much more difficult to be creative without leaving the genre. So, if one thinks that a few quality trance tracks are a bit fluffy and superficial, he'll probably think that most are. But IMO every genre kind of serves its own purpose. The indie-rock-electro-tech-house-hip-hop-whatchamacallit that I'm into now is awesome, but it won't ever be able to do what trance does, and likewise, trance won't ever be able to do what it does, so I'm kinda learning to pick and choose the producers I see, and take things in small doses so that I don't completely lose interest in any one genre. As far as the evolution of my musical pref goes, I'm trying to stay away from opening up to new sounds, then cutting myself off from old ones. Just because I find jazz exciting doesn't mean I should stop listening to classical you know?


Posted by DJ Eco on Feb-26-2007 05:23:

Down with BPM magazine!


Posted by trancintaiwan on Feb-26-2007 06:47:

quote:
Originally posted by steven-neil
hai lee,,,shangri la "at best" is an "ok" tune to a noob but to an old schooler like me it is a total rip off of almost every single tune ive ever heard....its beachball meets cafe del mar meets burned with desire,,,and you know what i'm talking about...

i respect your djing skills,,,but if youre gonna do sumfin then do it right...


i guess i can sorta see what you mean... yes we used similar sounds to other tracks.. including a piano and whatnot.... but all our melodies are original. never did we listen to another track and be like... lets modify that melody to fit our ears and nor have i ever heard other trance tracks that use a cello and oboe as the main lead (you most likely didn't know it was cello/oboe). and with u saying trance is as easy as picking a preset, thats totally untrue. my co-producer and i spent countless days trying to change parameters so the raw sounds produced by the synths actually sound good. that track actually took almost a year to make. if you pay close attention to all the sound effects, they were all made from scratch. none of that using fx samples. we would take a clean sound, stretch it, throw on plugins, reverse it... do all of that stuff. now pay close attention to the # of layers that is on the track as well. how many would u count or can u pick out? probably like 15 or so... now u may be surprised when i tell u that track had up to 60 different parts. also how many tracks have u heard that is constantly changing from beginning to end. thats the style that andy and i stuck with in the beginning because we wanted the track to change and evolve as it went along. we didn't pick a simple repeatable riff that built up once.. broke down, and built up again. not one melody in the beginning can be heard towards the middle/end of the track.

now it may sound like i'm defending myself a bit much... and its not that i don't take constructive criticism... its just that what you are criticizing just really has no basis because its completely false. i guess if you said something like, you guys used trance sounds that other tracks have used before... i'd say ok... thats mostly true. but saying its a ripoff and that trance is easy to make kinda irritates me. you really have no idea what it takes unless if you are sitting there actually making it yourself.


Posted by TheVrk on Feb-26-2007 13:46:

For me its simple. Besides trance, i love progressive and house as well.
Trance just makes me FEEL the best.
ONLY trance gives me goosebumps, that says a LOT imo


Posted by euphoria on Feb-26-2007 14:21:

quote:
Originally posted by trancinchink you really have no idea what it takes unless if you are sitting there actually making it yourself.


I agree. When I took an interest into production at first I said to myself ah this is going to be a piece of cake and then when I actually got all of the programs and saw how much detail goes into every note and how all of the sounds had to be contantly tweaked to perfection I started to loose hope and get very frustrated.

It wasnt until a few other producers from on this board took me under they're wing and showed me some proper direction that I really started understanding what it was all about.


Posted by steven-neil on Feb-26-2007 15:32:

quote:
Originally posted by trancinchink
i guess i can sorta see what you mean... yes we used similar sounds to other tracks.. including a piano and whatnot.... but all our melodies are original. never did we listen to another track and be like... lets modify that melody to fit our ears and nor have i ever heard other trance tracks that use a cello and oboe as the main lead (you most likely didn't know it was cello/oboe). and with u saying trance is as easy as picking a preset, thats totally untrue. my co-producer and i spent countless days trying to change parameters so the raw sounds produced by the synths actually sound good. that track actually took almost a year to make. if you pay close attention to all the sound effects, they were all made from scratch. none of that using fx samples. we would take a clean sound, stretch it, throw on plugins, reverse it... do all of that stuff. now pay close attention to the # of layers that is on the track as well. how many would u count or can u pick out? probably like 15 or so... now u may be surprised when i tell u that track had up to 60 different parts. also how many tracks have u heard that is constantly changing from beginning to end. thats the style that andy and i stuck with in the beginning because we wanted the track to change and evolve as it went along. we didn't pick a simple repeatable riff that built up once.. broke down, and built up again. not one melody in the beginning can be heard towards the middle/end of the track.

now it may sound like i'm defending myself a bit much... and its not that i don't take constructive criticism... its just that what you are criticizing just really has no basis because its completely false. i guess if you said something like, you guys used trance sounds that other tracks have used before... i'd say ok... thats mostly true. but saying its a ripoff and that trance is easy to make kinda irritates me. you really have no idea what it takes unless if you are sitting there actually making it yourself.



hai lee...you are missing the point...i said you are very talented but at the same time you should be pushing in a new direction...


Posted by yankeeBaby on Feb-26-2007 15:47:

quote:
Originally posted by TheVrk
For me its simple. Besides trance, i love progressive and house as well.
Trance just makes me FEEL the best.
ONLY trance gives me goosebumps, that says a LOT imo


Vrk, I agree with you 1,000% Simple as that.


Posted by trancintaiwan on Feb-26-2007 17:17:

quote:
Originally posted by steven-neil
hai lee...you are missing the point...i said you are very talented but at the same time you should be pushing in a new direction...



i guess i can see what you mean about innovation... but i have to be honest with myself and realize that at this point in time.. i'm still a beginner/noob to producing compared to some people like.... BT, Shiloh, Benz & MD, Orkidea. its so hard to innovate when it takes me hours upon hours just to get something decent out of my computer. i'd definitely love to push boundaries eventually with my music... but at this point... i can't really consider that option just yet. gotta get the basics down before i can go above & beyond.. (no pun intended)


Posted by massivenyc on Feb-26-2007 17:54:

Guess what, I do. I know that one day Trance and I are gonna get married on top of a mountain, and there's going to be flutes playing and trombones and flowers and garlands of fresh herbs. And we will dance till the sun rises. And then our children will form a family band. And we will tour the countryside and you won't be invited.


Posted by Blake on Feb-26-2007 18:03:

quote:
Originally posted by massivenyc
Guess what, I do. I know that one day Trance and I are gonna get married on top of a mountain, and there's going to be flutes playing and trombones and flowers and garlands of fresh herbs. And we will dance till the sun rises. And then our children will form a family band. And we will tour the countryside and you won't be invited.


!


Posted by dj tek on Feb-26-2007 18:16:

me & trance got a fucking divorce in 2004. that hoes turned too loose for my taste & needs.. my house is fucking tight, just how i like it.


Posted by bogartgreens on Feb-26-2007 18:19:

quote:
Originally posted by dj tek
me & trance got a fucking divorce in 2004. that hoes turned too loose for my taste & needs.. my house is fucking tight, just how i like it.


very well put..im on a trial separation myself and enjoyin it


Posted by massivenyc on Feb-26-2007 18:39:

quote:
Originally posted by dj tek
me & trance got a fucking divorce in 2004. that hoes turned too loose for my taste & needs.. my house is fucking tight, just how i like it.


I'm married to trance but will fool around on the side with some forms of house, electro and tech...
(that is until I really find a keeper and then I'm going Mormon on EDM!)


Posted by steven-neil on Feb-26-2007 21:29:

quote:
Originally posted by massivenyc
I'm married to trance but will fool around on the side with some forms of house, electro and tech...
(that is until I really find a keeper and then I'm going Mormon on EDM!)


I think it's cool that youre gay....


Posted by massivenyc on Feb-26-2007 21:45:

quote:
Originally posted by steven-neil
I think it's cool that youre gay....


good glad to hear that, as long as u wont be uncomfortable, thats the most important thing! wouldnt want u being uncomfortable in ur own home and all.


Posted by steven-neil on Feb-26-2007 21:52:

quote:
Originally posted by massivenyc
good glad to hear that, as long as u wont be uncomfortable, thats the most important thing! wouldnt want u being uncomfortable in ur own home and all.


im gonna build a big gay pink house for you


Posted by massivenyc on Feb-26-2007 21:55:

quote:
Originally posted by steven-neil
im gonna build a big gay pink house for you


the things im gonna make brian do for a gonzo wife beater, mmmmmm......


Posted by kaykay on Feb-27-2007 20:29:

Re: t r a n c e

quote:
Originally posted by colibri
what do you like about good trance...
personally i love the they it can integrate
beauty and superb energy ceaselessly wowow



;)


why is your text so small?


Posted by euphoria on Feb-28-2007 17:47:

Re: Re: t r a n c e

quote:
Originally posted by kaykay
why is your text so small?


Kay Kay...meet David, you will need a magnifying glass and possibly (no definetly) a translator to understand any of his posts.


Posted by yankeeBaby on Feb-28-2007 19:05:

Re: Re: Re: t r a n c e

quote:
Originally posted by euphoria
Kay Kay...meet David, you will need a magnifying glass and possibly (no definetly) a translator to understand any of his posts.




Posted by phoenixBEBE on Feb-28-2007 19:09:

Re: Re: t r a n c e

quote:
Originally posted by kaykay
why is your text so small?


rofl oh man...yes meet david, he is definitely UNIQUE


Posted by phoenixBEBE on Feb-28-2007 19:14:

quote:
Originally posted by bogartgreens
very well put..im on a trial separation myself and enjoyin it


ivew been contemplating separation for a LONG time now...

but somehow, something new manages to come thru and it just pulls me BACK in. im hopeless

at least im open to others like prog/tech house, minimal even d&b...


Posted by colibri on Mar-01-2007 00:38:

quote:
Originally posted by kaykay
why is your text so small


i don't know maybe to save spaceveryone is different...





;)


Posted by DJ_Lord on Mar-01-2007 00:55:

colibri, dame el numero de tu dealer que se nota que tu hierba esta a calidaddd!


Posted by colibri on Mar-01-2007 01:13:

imagination is not a virtue guaranteed by
any means you are either born with it or not


Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.