Mekka - Diamondback (Ben Gold Mix)

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Mekka - Diamondback (Ben Gold Mix)
Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Posted by isoterra on Jul-20-2007 08:48:

quote:
Originally posted by RebeL9
Seems like he didn't even bothered to do anything with it.

you seem to use this argument alot & this time it really is complete bollocks

Posted by RebeL9 on Jul-20-2007 08:56:

quote:
Originally posted by isoterra
you seem to use this argument alot & this time it really is complete bollocks

but it's true. the original is such a nice tune it shouldn't be difficult to make something good with it. but this is a total failure.

Posted by keithos27 on Jul-20-2007 13:16:

i like it. i mean don't get me wrong, i love the original and all, but i think this remix adds a little something *different* than the original. i'm not saying one is better than the other (i'm not going to debate one over the other). i'm just saying this remix is different and adds a little something (a bit harder) that the original mix didn't have. not a bad thing for a remix done 5 or 6 years later...

i'm very curious to hear his remix of "not over yet" (off of a lively mind, not the other/older not over).

Posted by isoterra on Jul-20-2007 17:04:

quote:
Originally posted by RebeL9
but it's true. the original is such a nice tune it shouldn't be difficult to make something good with it. but this is a total failure.

true, but you said he didn't bother to do *anything* with it.. which would imply he made a pointless clone of the original, when infact it sounds completely different in style/mood, as well as making it useable in situations where the original wasn't. obviously all that doesn't mean i don't think it's shit, but i'll admit to it having a purpose all the same

Posted by trancedanne on Jul-20-2007 20:08:

the original is one of the weakest tunes from isos 2 imo, i liked it at first but those vocal samples are just to much..

Posted by RebeL9 on Jul-20-2007 21:20:

quote:
Originally posted by isoterra
true, but you said he didn't bother to do *anything* with it.. which would imply he made a pointless clone of the original, when infact it sounds completely different in style/mood, as well as making it useable in situations where the original wasn't. obviously all that doesn't mean i don't think it's shit, but i'll admit to it having a purpose all the same

haha yes i agree that it came out a bit weird. what i meant was that he didn't bother to do anything special with it instead of just going for a very generic aproach.

Pages (2): « 1 [2]