TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Your definition of a Whore.....???
Pages (7): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 »


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Aug-03-2007 20:32:

quote:
Originally posted by Ang ' ela_ie
It has nothing to do with what he/she does in bed (I dont think we need to be exclusive to women, here), but rather the amount of partners he/she has in any given amount of time, and the relationship he/she has with said partner.

For example, a girl came into town the other weekend and slept with a friend of mine two nights in a row. Had never met him before, had never talked to him before. She was only in town for the weekend seeing a friend, and now she's gone.

When you sleep with someone on the first night you meet him or her, youre dirty.


That's very animalistic. Why is it so reprehensible though? If you do it out of confusion or ignorance, that's one thing, but is the act of sex immoral in itself?


Posted by SuspicionVandit on Aug-03-2007 20:33:

quote:
Originally posted by Ang ' ela_ie
For example, a girl came into town the other weekend and slept with a friend of mine two nights in a row. Had never met him before, had never talked to him before. She was only in town for the weekend seeing a friend, and now she's gone.


does she know how to read?
does she dress herself?


Posted by beats and beeps on Aug-03-2007 20:34:

quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
but is the act of sex immoral in itself?

not at all, its the emotions and other shit attached to it of course.

and yes people will say you can come to casual sex understandings and nobody will get hurt...but in all honesty all i ever hear about is massive drama from people who have a lot of casual sex. someone will always get their feelings hurt eventually.


Posted by chimera66 on Aug-03-2007 20:35:

quote:
Originally posted by SuspicionVandit
very easy to spot a woman whore:
Revealing and suggestive clothing. Yes, i said it. If you wear your ass and tits outside your clothes, you are worthy of being deemed a whore, regardless if it is hot(temperature).
"omg, it's too hot outside, I can't wear conventional shorts, I have to wear Abercrombie & Fag shorts and Banana Swallowic thongs."
If you are going to look the part, at least act the part and stop resisting men throwing water bottles at your shirt. It's not your fault you have huge tits, it's your fault men felt the need to grab them at Woodstock '99. The only bad thing is that they didn't tip you for the grab.


i so disagree, you could wear revealing clothing and look nothing like a whore. short shorts and a baggy top is nice.

also it's not really fair to make someone feel like a whore because she was born looking a certain way. one of my best friends has like F sized boobs, light blond hair and a small person in stature and because of people like you she dyed her hair brown and wears bagger clothes to stop guys from hitting on her all the damn time and take her seriously.

whores can be men or women and being a whore isn't determined on how you look but by actions.


Posted by Frenchie on Aug-03-2007 20:36:

quote:
Originally posted by beats and beeps
wow yeah sounds like great grounds for a debate.

just like rape is knowing what you want and going for it. They want pussy, they are going to get it.

they want you to give aids, you are gonna get it.

because following raw desire always beats logic!


I'm not even touching the rape discussion, because there is none. Why have logic when two people obviously want to have sex. I never said you're going to get dick, but there is nothing wrong with going to get what you want. She wanted it, he said yes obvisouly and it's a done deal.


Posted by beats and beeps on Aug-03-2007 20:39:

quote:
Originally posted by Frenchie
I'm not even touching the rape discussion, because there is none. Why have logic when two people obviously want to have sex. I never said you're going to get dick, but there is nothing wrong with going to get what you want. She wanted it, he said yes obvisouly and it's a done deal.

yeah but we know everybody isnt honest about whether or not they REALLY want to have sex.
im talking about in most social situations.

I think if anybody wants to fuck around with that stuff, it should be really clear, that that is the only purpose beforehand if you know what i mean.

like swinger clubs, or furry gatherings or something somewhere where logic is applied to casual sex. People go in there knowing what they are gonna get.

but when its just sort of a hookup and you dont actually discuss that you are having casual sex, you never know what the other person intentions are.


Posted by Silky Johnson on Aug-03-2007 20:40:

quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
A person who clings to these things with adamant is not a whore, but is just as detestable; a prude.





I totally disagree with that!


Posted by Nicolas Oliver on Aug-03-2007 20:41:

quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On


Mulholland Drive FTW!


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Aug-03-2007 20:42:

quote:
Originally posted by jennypie
I totally disagree with that!


I mostly do as well, but they are at opposite sides of the terminology. Extremes of any type should always be scrutinized, especially when we have the power of "why?" on our side.


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Aug-03-2007 20:43:

Thumbs up

quote:
Originally posted by cenik
Mulholland Drive FTW!


noooooooooooo shit


Posted by Frenchie on Aug-03-2007 20:43:

quote:
Originally posted by beats and beeps
yeah but we know everybody isnt honest about whether or not they REALLY want to have sex.
im talking about in most social situations.

I think if anybody wants to fuck around with that stuff, it should be really clear, that that is the only purpose beforehand if you know what i mean.

like swinger clubs, or furry gatherings or something somewhere where logic is applied to casual sex. People go in there knowing what they are gonna get.

but when its just sort of a hookup and you dont actually discuss that you are having casual sex, you never know what the other person intentions are.


Ohh true true. yup.


Posted by VAR on Aug-03-2007 20:43:

*checks seat belt, thinks to himself- i'm glad i'm wearing one*


Posted by Silky Johnson on Aug-03-2007 20:46:

quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
I mostly do as well, but they are at opposite sides of the terminology. Extremes of any type should always be scrutinized, especially when we have the power of "why?" on our side.





Yeah yeah....man too bad it's Friday. I'm so not in the mood for lengthy discussions today. :/


Posted by david.michael on Aug-03-2007 20:49:

quote:
Originally posted by jennypie
Yeah yeah....man too bad it's Friday. I'm so not in the mood for lengthy discussions today. :/


Post 2 says that you are too biased to participate in this discussion anyway.


Posted by beats and beeps on Aug-03-2007 20:50:

quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
I do agree that it doesn't even have to be about sex though. However, "personal values, self-worth, and/or integrity" are all things that each individual should question at times. A person who clings to these things with adamant is not a whore, but is just as detestable; a prude.

questioning your personal values can often end up in fail.

like if you question your integrity in order to make someone else happy...well in the end youre not gonna be happy yourself, and then you'll probably end up taking it out on them making two people unhappy.

you cant have a happy relationship with a partner if you arent happy yourself.

also theres no reason to say that someone with self-worth or intergrity is a "prude"...you dont know how extreme their integrity is. I wouldnt call someone a prude just cuz they want to fall in love before having sex, thats just the way they roll maybe. You also have to remember that everybody doesnt even have the same sexual desire to begin with.

On the otherhand people who want to wait until marriage for sex are strange to me...cuz marriage doesnt really mean much does it? Well I guess it must to some people, but i dont understand why (unless they are religious in which case RUN AWAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY)


Posted by Silky Johnson on Aug-03-2007 20:52:

quote:
Originally posted by david.michael
Post 2 says that you are too biased to participate in this discussion anyway.




Harrrrrrrrr.


Posted by Ang ' ela_ie on Aug-03-2007 20:52:

quote:
Originally posted by SuspicionVandit
does she know how to read?
does she dress herself?


I dont understand the point youre trying to make.


Posted by SuspicionVandit on Aug-03-2007 20:53:

quote:
Originally posted by chimera66
i so disagree, you could wear revealing clothing and look nothing like a whore. short shorts and a baggy top is nice.

also it's not really fair to make someone feel like a whore because she was born looking a certain way. one of my best friends has like F sized boobs, light blond hair and a small person in stature and because of people like you she dyed her hair brown and wears bagger clothes to stop guys from hitting on her all the damn time and take her seriously.

whores can be men or women and being a whore isn't determined on how you look but by actions.


there's a classy way to do everything. It's their choice whether to go out in "shorts" or "whore shorts."
If they want to put on a show, I'm all for it. They are entertainers and it's only right for a gentlemen to praise such a strong performance of a woman (with bills and sausage swallowing contest trophies)


Posted by Frenchie on Aug-03-2007 20:54:

quote:
Originally posted by jennypie
Harrrrrrrrr.


Szeretlek te ged


Posted by beats and beeps on Aug-03-2007 20:54:

quote:
Originally posted by Ang ' ela_ie
I dont understand the point youre trying to make.

hes trying to say that stupid people are more commonly extremely sexually active.

Which is true by statistics, but doesnt really mean much.


Posted by Silky Johnson on Aug-03-2007 20:56:

quote:
Originally posted by Frenchie
Szeretlek te ged




Ich liebe dich!


Posted by Clovis on Aug-03-2007 20:57:

quote:
Originally posted by jennypie
Ich liebe dich!



001011101101010111100001101001 101001 00100100011001001!


Posted by SuspicionVandit on Aug-03-2007 20:58:

quote:
Originally posted by Ang ' ela_ie
I dont understand the point youre trying to make.


she's a horse?


Posted by Frenchie on Aug-03-2007 20:58:


Posted by VAR on Aug-03-2007 21:01:

quote:
Originally posted by beats and beeps
hes trying to say that stupid people are more commonly extremely sexually active.

Which is true by statistics, but doesnt really mean much.



i have to disagree wholeheartedly,

trying to associate the influence of the lower brain functions from the medulla cortex, as an attenuator of the higher brain functions is not logical by any means.


Pages (7): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.