TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Could you guys 'define' Deep House for me?
Pages (2): « 1 [2]


Posted by sljiva on Aug-18-2007 19:03:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
There were only really two times when prog trance and house sounded much the same. The first was about 1995, and the second was about 2001.


Blue Amazon, Marc Mitchell, Way Out West, BT... were all releasing records which are hard to classify in the meantime (1997, 1998, 1999). Even today you have people like Eelke Kleijn and Luke Chable who are doing prog. house that sounds like prog. trance and can be played in every other prog. trance set. I would say from 1995 onwards it's really hard to distinguish these two...


Posted by bubbleguuum on Aug-18-2007 19:47:

I associated Deep House with slower bpm house (let's say < 122bpm) with soulful elements and deep moody melodies (ie not peak time in your face stuff). It can have vocals or not and it can have some subtle bass work (not necessarily the kick) that makes you feel good.


Posted by Sykonee on Aug-18-2007 20:05:

quote:
Originally posted by unripelemon
I knew mnml wouldn't stay for long. Neither will deep house, or any other sub genre...

Er... Deep house has been around longer than nearly all forms of dance music. It's just seeing a bit of a resurgence lately due to the fact all the kids that got into electronic music in the late nineties have begun to mature in their tastes, seeking for a refined sound with soul, funk, jazz, etc.

It does get coined 'Dad House' for a reason.


Posted by maluco on Aug-18-2007 20:10:

Sykonee, its not about shitty mainstream.


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Aug-18-2007 22:43:

quote:
Originally posted by sljiva
Way Out West, BT... were all releasing records which are hard to classify in the meantime (1997, 1998, 1999).


Were they?


Posted by bobba lou on Aug-18-2007 22:57:

this thread will get good.


Posted by shaw on Aug-18-2007 23:02:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Dingel
are people jumping off the minimal bandwagon and onto deep house?


same music, different "label"


Posted by ibizzzaaa on Aug-18-2007 23:35:

Like any genre Deep House is flooded with a bunch of generic tracks. But if you dig through well enough you will find some awesome stuff.

My personal favorites that I have discovered so for:
Slope Feat. Desney Bailey - Keeping It Up (Henrik Schwarz Remix)
The Rhythm Slave - The Light You Will See (Trentem�ller's Dub Mix)
JohNick - A Breath Of Fresh Air (Henry Street Reprise)

Three true beauties


Posted by Sushipunk on Aug-19-2007 00:07:

Thanks for all the comments and examples guys


Posted by LoveHate on Aug-19-2007 01:14:

well minimal sucks, so i guess anything is better then that.


Posted by nefardec on Aug-19-2007 12:17:

quote:

Deep House is jazzy, soulful groovy stuff made by black people in Chicago and San Francisco.

Progressive House is drolling, monotonous stuff that's too stiff and unresponsive to be deep, soulful or funky, made by white people in Europe.


haha, pretty much.



progressive house is a terribly broad and non-descriptive term. Basically I would say that progressive house is house music which gave up its blackness for whiteness. Kind of like if a genre of music could be Michael Jackson.





also, deep house sucks, don't listen to it - real cool kids listen to minimal
psst listen the vintage italian set i posted


Posted by GoSpeedGo! on Aug-19-2007 14:12:

quote:
Originally posted by Sykonee
It's just seeing a bit of a resurgence lately due to the fact all the kids that got into electronic music in the late nineties have begun to mature in their tastes, seeking for a refined sound with soul, funk, jazz, etc.


No, that's not the reason. It's mainly because elements of deep house have started appearing in productions of the 'minimal' (or tech-house) guys and some sort of hybrid between these two was a result. For the case in point see: Solomun & Stimming - Eiszauber or Patrick Zigon - Soultray

Thus the growing interest in pure deep house. People noticed, magazines noticed and... let the hype begin.


Posted by Sykonee on Aug-19-2007 15:17:

quote:
Originally posted by paulandrews
No, that's not the reason. It's mainly because elements of deep house have started appearing in productions of the 'minimal' (or tech-house) guys and some sort of hybrid between these two was a result. For the case in point see: Solomun & Stimming - Eiszauber or Patrick Zigon - Soultray

Thus the growing interest in pure deep house. People noticed, magazines noticed and... let the hype begin.

I s'pose that's true too. My own experience with folks noticing the genre, though, tends to stem from associates jumping on the sound when they tire of music that's more obvious. Of course, this was at a time when minimal wasn't even heard of, beyond the proper stuff anyway.


Posted by cmay119 on Aug-19-2007 16:50:

quote:
Originally posted by nefardec

progressive house is a terribly broad and non-descriptive term.



Agreed, I think I have an easier time determining what isn't Progressive House than what it actually is.


Posted by sljiva on Aug-19-2007 17:23:

What's with that sudden animosity towards prog. house? I just hope we're hating new kind of prog. here (especially that awful mixture of prog. and electro), because IMO even the best deep house tunes can't compare with soulful, deep and fresh house music that was coming from Guerilla, Cowboy, Limbo and Stress at the beginning of the 90s


Posted by mndeg on Aug-19-2007 19:32:

whenever there's a discussion about deep house it ALWAYS drifts toward progressive house and prog trance because trance is more closely related to it and people are more familiar with it

anyway why describe it when you can listen to it?
http://www.ssradiouk.com/

and i would hardly call white room prog house. it's simply trance

here's an example of soulful house
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3CKhe8XrOk


Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.