TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Not to stir up some more heat...
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »


Posted by MR STROKE on Sep-18-2007 16:40:

quote:
Originally posted by RJT
This topic is as tired as Sean Tyas.


Posted by woscar on Sep-18-2007 16:48:

quote:
Originally posted by TheKidsWantTechno
what i AM sick of is advertising that a dj is going to perform "live," but all they end up doing is use ableton. for me, a live set has to significantly incorporate somthing other than cds, vinyls, or a computer - be it vocals, instruments, synthesizers, drum machines, effects boards, whatev - more than just an ableton controller. maybe im just old school, but i think instead of having a [Live] by their name on a flyer, it should say [Ableton]


"Live" refers to "live MIXING"...


Posted by RJT on Sep-18-2007 16:49:

quote:
Originally posted by woscar99
"Live" refers to "live MIXING"...




I bet it does.


Posted by woscar on Sep-18-2007 16:53:

quote:
Originally posted by RJT


I bet it does.


Well, the guy who started the thread seemed to have another concept. I reckon, it makes a lot o sense, but nevertheless that's what a DJ does live: mix.

On the other hand, what I do find ridiculous is the "Tiesto in Concert" deal...


Posted by RJT on Sep-18-2007 16:55:

quote:
Originally posted by woscar99
Well, the guy who started the thread seemed to have another concept. I reckon, it makes a lot o sense, but nevertheless that's what a DJ does live: mix.



Yes but when it's already well established norm that someone being billed as performing "live" is specifically not just DJ'ing, then it's a load of horse shit to just get up there and mix records like any other DJ would.


Posted by Pete K on Sep-18-2007 17:01:

quote:
Originally posted by RJT
Yes but when it's already well established norm that someone being billed as performing "live" is specifically not just DJ'ing, then it's a load of horse shit to just get up there and mix records like any other DJ would.



lol kind of like Martin Buttrich's set @ Bed this past WMC. What a load of shit...all I saw was a laptop.



Posted by woscar on Sep-18-2007 17:06:

quote:
Originally posted by RJT
Yes but when it's already well established norm that someone being billed as performing "live" is specifically not just DJ'ing, then it's a load of horse shit to just get up there and mix records like any other DJ would.


When a rock band, let's say Linkin Park gives a concert they are performing live. When a solo artist/vocalist, let's say John Mayer gives a concert, and plays guitar, sings on stage he in fact is performing live. Then why the hell, when a DJ, who's "art" is mixing songs into one another, gets behind a booth and does this on the go without having any pre-recorded transitions isn't performing live?


Posted by nchs09 on Sep-18-2007 17:06:

quote:
Originally posted by Blake_Jarrell

reality: yes you can! the beat detection in the pioneer cdj1000s is so good that all you have to do is move the pitch slider up just enough to change it to the next bpm and do the same with the other deck and boom instantly synced tempo (and the more precise the decimal the better i.e. +8,+10,+16). as long as you are playing direct from the master mp3s (beatport etc) it will sync up perfectly 98% of the time. vinyl rips dont work though.


explain. because i dont get it, but from my experience you cant.


honestly i didnt like ableton about a year ago, but 6 months ago, i changed and now i like it.


Posted by chris harrington on Sep-18-2007 17:07:

I have absolutely no problem what so ever with ppl who use Abelton, i myself will never use it though because it just dosent feel right to me. I would feel weird just looking at a laptop/computer when im djing, i like to play with all the buttons and faders and stuff on the mixer lol


Posted by RJT on Sep-18-2007 17:09:

quote:
Originally posted by woscar99
When a rock band, let's say Linkin Park gives a concert they are performing live. When a solo artist/vocalist, let's say John Mayer gives a concert, and plays guitar, sings on stage he in fact is performing live. Then why the hell, when a DJ, who's "art" is mixing songs into one another, gets behind a booth and does this on the go without having any pre-recorded transitions isn't performing live?


Because while that's accurate in a semantic sense (the DJ is indeed doing something "live"), it's completely inaccurate when you look at how shows are actually billed, and will in general serve only to invite criticism.

DJ's can bill themselves as performing "live" all they want - but it isn't going to change the fact that people are going to expect far more than just DJ set from them, and will inevitably just be let down when they see just yet another chucklehead spinning records.


Posted by woscar on Sep-18-2007 17:10:

quote:
Originally posted by chris harrington
I have absolutely no problem what so ever with ppl who use Abelton, i myself will never use it though because it just dosent feel right to me. I would feel weird just looking at a laptop/computer when im djing, i like to play with all the buttons and faders and stuff on the mixer lol


You can still do if you hook-up an analog mixer to your laptop


Posted by chris harrington on Sep-18-2007 17:16:

quote:
Originally posted by woscar99
You can still do if you hook-up an analog mixer to your laptop


yep i know, still i wont be able to play with the cdjs and TT's lol


Posted by DJ Mikey Mike on Sep-18-2007 17:20:

Re: Not to stir up some more heat...

quote:
Originally posted by iammesol
J00F said on his latest Electronic Grooves "I didn't cheat and use Ableton Live or anything like that, used good old Pioneer CDJ decks."


John 00 Fleming is a fucking clown, and the more people that come to realise this the better.


Posted by woscar on Sep-18-2007 17:20:

quote:
Originally posted by RJT
Because while that's accurate in a semantic sense (the DJ is indeed doing something "live"), it's completely inaccurate when you look at how shows are actually billed, and will in general serve only to invite criticism.

DJ's can bill themselves as performing "live" all they want - but it isn't going to change the fact that people are going to expect far more than just DJ set from them, and will inevitably just be let down when they see just yet another chucklehead spinning records.


Probably, but I've never had that problem here...for example when a DJ plays it is generally billed as a DJ set, for example "Hernan Cattaneo (DJ Set)" and when an actual live PA plays it's billed as "Infected Mushroom (Live Act)".

If you think about it, it's the promoter's fault not the performer's...


Posted by Blake_Jarrell on Sep-18-2007 17:24:

quote:
Originally posted by nchs09
explain. because i dont get it, but from my experience you cant.


honestly i didnt like ableton about a year ago, but 6 months ago, i changed and now i like it.


i already did, what do you not understand? maybe try it yourself?

it amazes me to no end that this is not well known.


Posted by nchs09 on Sep-18-2007 17:25:

i currently can not since one of my cdjs is broken. maybe i could not achieve this because one of my cdjs is an 800mk2 and the other one is a 1000mk3?


Posted by Blake_Jarrell on Sep-18-2007 17:30:

quote:
Originally posted by nchs09
i currently can not since one of my cdjs is broken. maybe i could not achieve this because one of my cdjs is an 800mk2 and the other one is a 1000mk3?


maybe you were playing vinyl rips, vinyl rips dont work because the tempo tends to wiggle since the motors on turntables arent as exact as cdjs.


Posted by Nik Novo on Sep-18-2007 17:34:

quote:
Originally posted by woscar99
When a rock band, let's say Linkin Park gives a concert they are performing live. When a solo artist/vocalist, let's say John Mayer gives a concert, and plays guitar, sings on stage he in fact is performing live. Then why the hell, when a DJ, who's "art" is mixing songs into one another, gets behind a booth and does this on the go without having any pre-recorded transitions isn't performing live?


Because it's been for ages, that acts that have been promoted as "live" are really performing live and not mixing live. If you go by your definition, then everyone flyers for festivals would have to be announced as live, that would be like

Armin van Buuren (live)
Sono (live)
Northern Lite (live)
Carl Cox (live)

whereas Sono and Northern Lite would be the only 2 to really perform live. I hope you do know what the definition of performing live is


Posted by woscar on Sep-18-2007 18:03:

quote:
Originally posted by Nik Novo
Because it's been for ages, that acts that have been promoted as "live" are really performing live and not mixing live. If you go by your definition, then everyone flyers for festivals would have to be announced as live, that would be like

Armin van Buuren (live)
Sono (live)
Northern Lite (live)
Carl Cox (live)

whereas Sono and Northern Lite would be the only 2 to really perform live. I hope you do know what the definition of performing live is


Again, that would be the promoter's fault, not the artist's/DJ's


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Sep-18-2007 18:09:

Live means that the sound is being generated or significantly manipulated on the spot in some way, whether with synths, computers, or "real" instruments.

I.e. not just tracks played back with the tempo tweaked a little and the highs / lows / mids adjusted. A DJ with turntables or CDJs is not "live."


Posted by nchs09 on Sep-18-2007 18:10:

quote:
Originally posted by Blake_Jarrell
maybe you were playing vinyl rips, vinyl rips dont work because the tempo tends to wiggle since the motors on turntables arent as exact as cdjs.
no, i buy all my stuff from beatport. honestly the only time i had an easy time matching tracks (easier than normally, because matching is not exactly rocket science) it was peter pestra tracks becasue they all have the same tempo.


Posted by nchs09 on Sep-18-2007 18:11:

quote:
Originally posted by woscar99
Again, that would be the promoter's fault, not the artist's/DJ's
well, you get the point, you are just talking technicalities.


Posted by Clovis on Sep-18-2007 18:45:

Solution: Stop seeing DJ's who suck at Ableton, like Gabriel & Dresden.


Posted by iammesol on Sep-18-2007 20:31:

quote:
Originally posted by Clovis
Solution: Stop seeing DJ's who suck at Ableton, like Gabriel & Dresden.


quote:
Originally posted by Blake_Jarrell
myth: Ableton mixes for you

reality: Ableton beatmatches for you, you still have to do all of your own fading and eqing etc...everything and anything a dj using decks would do, but you CAN do more because in theory you have an infinite number of decks and god knows how much more cooler effects and techniques. its
up to the user to elaborate and use ableton to his advantage.

myth: you cant cheat with CDJs

reality: yes you can! the beat detection in the pioneer cdj1000s is so good that all you have to do is move the pitch slider up just enough to change it to the next bpm and do the same with the other deck and boom instantly synced tempo (and the more precise the decimal the better i.e. +8,+10,+16). as long as you are playing direct from the master mp3s (beatport etc) it will sync up perfectly 98% of the time. vinyl rips dont work though.


in summation, ableton and cdjs are at the same level of "cheatability" if you ask me.



/thread.


It's the ignorance of people who don't realize what has been said above that pisses me off to no extent. Thanks Blake so much for speaking your mind.


Posted by RJT on Sep-18-2007 20:52:

quote:
Originally posted by Clovis
Solution: Stop seeing DJ's who suck at Ableton, like Gabriel & Dresden.


Aren't we talking about live performances here and not DJ's?

I can think of only one live performer who is entirely Ableton based who is not atrocious.


Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.