What cigarette do you smoke, doctor ?

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- What cigarette do you smoke, doctor ?
Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Posted by Rose on Sep-23-2007 16:26:

quote:
Originally posted by Orpheus Is Dead
i never really understood the whole anti-smoking movement...

If I want to go smoke and fuck up my lungs thats my business..I don't understand those people who protest it. If they feel its bad then they shouldn't do it.

But honestly why do they give a fuck if I do it? Why get rid of cigarettes, which I smoke, just because they feel its bad?

I agree, it's our body and if we feel like fucking up our lungs then so be it.

Posted by Taranis on Sep-23-2007 16:29:

I think a lot of people want to get rid of smoking because:

1) It can be something that people start with, not anticipating the damage it does/addiction, but only realising later when they're already suffering repercussions.

2) The smoke smells disgusting to most non-smokers.

Personally I don't mind it, as long as they don't smoke up public places too much. I might have a cig or two on a night out, it goes well with drinking, no idea why.

Posted by Rose on Sep-23-2007 16:31:

quote:
Originally posted by Taranis I might have a cig or two on a night out, it goes well with drinking, no idea why.

+1

I've always wondered why it goes well with drinking also.

Posted by Taranis on Sep-23-2007 16:33:

Yeah it's weird.

I don't smoke at all on a daily basis. Doesn't appeal to me/too expensive/can't deal with the health issues.

But the moment I have a few drinks it seems like an awsome idea, it's just really fun when you're drunk.

Posted by mickeymouse2490 on Sep-23-2007 22:23:

At the end of the day smoking is bad for you,it gives you bad breath and smelly clothes and most of all it gives you cancer.

Posted by eckmek on Sep-23-2007 23:32:

quote:
Originally posted by ikhouvanu
I agree, it's our body and if we feel like fucking up our lungs then so be it.

It's called passive smoking, ever heard of it?

Posted by Darkarbiter on Sep-24-2007 08:27:

quote:
Originally posted by NeoPhono
False on the anorexic people being just as big of a burden as the overweight (from an overall standpoint), but I do know where you're coming from. That's why "thin" was in quotation marks, because I was not trying to equate thin with healthy, just thin as in not overweight. I could have put "non-overweight," but I thought the "thin" in quotation marks worked just as well, and sounded a bit less stuffy. I'm in no way saying that all thin people or non-overweight people are healthy, simply that the cost of care for the obese far exceeds the cost of care for the non-obese, and that difference is more than between smokers and non-smokers.

Heck, as far as smoking goes, if you're young and plan on quitting sometime in the reasonable future, it'll probably have no long-term effects on your health. Your doctor will never fully approve, but they know full well a young smoker who quits will probably never suffer any life-long problems because of it. The same could be said about the young obese population, but there is a dangerous rise in type II diabetes in the young, and even if they lose the weight, they'll be diabetics the rest of their lives.

Yes but then you have the chance of getting addicted "Hey I'm still young just one more year". You may have been speaking metaphorically though.

Posted by NeoPhono on Sep-24-2007 13:48:

quote:
Originally posted by Darkarbiter
Yes but then you have the chance of getting addicted "Hey I'm still young just one more year". You may have been speaking metaphorically though.

I'm just saying that regardless of addiction, if you smoke while you're young but quit within a reasonable time frame, the long-term effects of smoking are almost always negligable.

Pages (2): « 1 [2]