TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Australia
-- Decks, mixers and headphones...
Pages (2): « 1 [2]


Posted by mmkoiman on Nov-01-2007 05:20:

quote:
Originally posted by Deeman
Bags in for mix sesh Jed ... well overdue!


i'm thinkin' early to mid December dewd i'll keep ya posted


Posted by EgosXII on Nov-01-2007 05:42:

quote:
Originally posted by mmkoiman
jordo - grab second hand CDJ100's as they do the job just as well as the 200's and get a numark DXM06 mixer... quality piece of equipment and perfect to get started on. they go for around $400-$500 if i remember correctly...


rockin'-- do they have the effects tho?? I just wanted the 200's first cause they seem a bit more sturdy, and cause of the effects... i mean, i shouldn't touch them i know, but who could resist??
mix-sesh sounds like hot-cakes too duuuuuuude!

and a good suggestion there philbz too-- thanks I'll drop em an email, see what's hapnin-

and don't even start on the ideal setup i WANT denham, sheesh... sif i'd want 200's mmmmmmm, cdj1000mk3s, and one'a those DJM-700s would be nice: can't beat the 800 for pure hotness tho c'mon! sif silver- lol


Posted by narcism on Nov-01-2007 05:55:

quote:
Originally posted by EgosXII
I'm also hoping to buy some decks by the end of the year: however, unlike dan, money is an issue




cheap as chips


Posted by Deeman on Nov-01-2007 05:59:

Fuck now THAT is the SHIT!


Posted by vanilla_cola on Nov-01-2007 06:01:

quote:
Originally posted by narcism


cheap as chips


Clearly these are scratch capable!


Posted by EgosXII on Nov-01-2007 06:32:

quote:
Originally posted by narcism


cheap as chips


jeez, they look pretty maad, must be pricey!... might have to get em second-hand


Posted by narcism on Nov-01-2007 06:46:

quote:
Originally posted by EgosXII
jeez, they look pretty maad, must be pricey!... might have to get em second-hand


batteries not included


Posted by mmkoiman on Nov-01-2007 07:07:

quote:
Originally posted by EgosXII
rockin'-- do they have the effects tho??


yeah, three effects.. uhh.. deeman, help me out here: JET, ...something, ....something.. ??? WAIT.. JET, ZIP and WAH. all awesome in their own right

most mixers have effects too though remember..


Posted by EgosXII on Nov-01-2007 07:22:

quote:
Originally posted by mmkoiman
yeah, three effects.. uhh.. deeman, help me out here: JET, ...something, ....something.. ??? WAIT.. JET, ZIP and WAH. all awesome in their own right

most mixers have effects too though remember..


yeah sweet-- those're the ones on the 200s
love jet XD

yeah, the effects on the mixers (on the numark at least) are pretty dodge


Posted by mmkoiman on Nov-01-2007 08:33:

quote:
Originally posted by EgosXII
yeah, the effects on the mixers (on the numark at least) are pretty dodge


bWAh? i reckon the effects on the numarks are mad.


Posted by narcism on Nov-01-2007 08:36:

fx are over rated as rad displayed at the spitroast


Posted by dan_essential on Nov-01-2007 12:17:

quote:
Originally posted by vanilla_cola
I would agree but add a numark DXM09 for the mixer, I own one with 2 cdj 800s and it's a decent home setup for money. The DXM09 is about 500-$600 and probably the best value mixer in that price bracket.


I had that mixer, it was awesome.

I might get it again, and the 200's look enticing. A few dj's I know also tell me that they're good for home use, without superflously spending money.


Posted by Philby on Nov-01-2007 12:42:

effects are mad! just ask teflon teapot, he loves them


Posted by mmkoiman on Nov-01-2007 21:50:

quote:
Originally posted by narcism
fx are over rated as rad displayed at the spitroast



Posted by EgosXII on Nov-02-2007 02:26:

quote:
Originally posted by narcism
fx are over rated as I displayed at the spitroast


you can't talk mrs. Kill-the-bass-and-don't-turn-it-back-on-at-the-right-time!!



so there's no major difference between the 1 & 200s?
I've used 200s a bit and they're pretty mad, especially for a mix-up, but havn't used 100s-- always thout they were crappy... but yeah, havn't used em, so


Posted by vanilla_cola on Nov-02-2007 02:39:

quote:
Originally posted by EgosXII
you can't talk mrs. Kill-the-bass-and-don't-turn-it-back-on-at-the-right-time!!



so there's no major difference between the 1 & 200s?
I've used 200s a bit and they're pretty mad, especially for a mix-up, but havn't used 100s-- always thout they were crappy... but yeah, havn't used em, so


HEAPS of differences. 100's don't have a beat counter, loops, no mp3 or folders and no tap cue and play (you can't press and hold cue to preview then tap play and release to play the track, if you get what I mean ha). 200's are heaps better imho.


Posted by Aesthetic on Nov-02-2007 02:51:

cdj's play mp3s now? fark lol


Posted by EgosXII on Nov-02-2007 03:09:

quote:
Originally posted by vanilla_cola
100's don't have a beat counter, loops and no tap cue and play (you can't press and hold cue to preview then tap play and release to play the track, if you get what I mean ha). 200's are heaps better imho.


oh, that sucks

fuck, gonna have to get 200s... stupid saving!!


Posted by Yohan on Nov-02-2007 03:14:

Re: Decks, mixers and headphones...

quote:
Originally posted by dan_essential
I sold my Tech 1210's and Numark Mixer a couple years back and would like to get some advice on new equipment. I know Tech 1210'/1200's don't really lose value, but I'm, this time around, wanting some advice on CD players. What would you invest into?

2 Decks + 1 Mixer + Headphones

Genre: Uplifting/Progressive/Tech Trance.

Price doesn't matter

You need to do a search on DJ Booth forum. You can probably read up for days on CDJs if you want opinions

same with headphones. be sure to check out the huge headphones thread.

quote:
Originally posted by Anomyst
Pioneer CDJ1000 MK3 X2
Sennheiser HD-25 Headphones
Pioneer DJM800 Mixer

* if money is not an issue.

hehehehe...
senn hd25 ftw. pio mixer... meh

quote:
Originally posted by steve_may
zone ftl :P

if money all of a sudden becomes an issue, for a home setup i rekon u cant go past 2 cdj200's or 800's and a djm400 mixer

pioneer ftw!

xone ftw. (well, not xone 32)

I guess it depends on what you want on a mixer. I'm happy with 4band eq, best possible filters, excellent sound quality. (though not much of an issue if you're playing only at home)

quote:
Originally posted by vanilla_cola
I would agree but add a numark DXM09 for the mixer, I own one with 2 cdj 800s and it's a decent home setup for money. The DXM09 is about 500-$600 and probably the best value mixer in that price bracket.

http://www.numark.com/dxm09

agreed. though the eq knobs get slippery after a while, and the cueing system needs to be louder.

but for the price it's probably the best choice.

quote:
Originally posted by mmkoiman
...on top of that you're gunna need to consider an amp and speakers or self powered monitors if you wanna skip the amp idea if i get you and rad over for a mixy sesh soon i'll show ya my monitors (which is what i'd suggest)..

depends.... if this is for home djing only you can get away with just a monitor. or even hook it up to your computer if you have a soundcard that is compatible to hook up with a mixer

but if you think of entertaining people at your house in the future, speakers setup do come into consideration

quote:
Originally posted by narcism
fx are over rated as rad displayed at the spitroast

agreed. what is up with most trance DJs and their fascination with efx? esp. since most of them don't know how to use effects well?

quote:
Originally posted by vanilla_cola
HEAPS of differences. 100's don't have a beat counter, loops, no mp3 or folders and no tap cue and play (you can't press and hold cue to preview then tap play and release to play the track, if you get what I mean ha). 200's are heaps better imho.

not to mention .1 pitch increments vs 200's .02 IIRC.

and the annoying jog wheel on both 100 and 200.

I love my 1000mk3s because of .02 pitch increments and wav display. but I wouldn't settle for anything less than 800s (mk2s preferably) personally

quote:
Originally posted by Aesthetic
cdj's play mp3s now? fark lol

yeah. takes a while to organize properly so that you don't take 5 mins looking for a song though.

though a lot of djs still stick to max 2 tunes on a cd for simplicity's sake


Posted by EgosXII on Nov-02-2007 04:20:

Re: Re: Decks, mixers and headphones...

quote:
Originally posted by EvilTree
what is up with most trance DJs and their fascination with efx? esp. since most of them don't know how to use effects well?


it's cause they have like 8 minutes of standing around to do before they can mix again
I get bored mixing trance, and i've only been doing it for like a month: fx are teh fun!!


Posted by Yohan on Nov-02-2007 06:31:

Re: Re: Re: Decks, mixers and headphones...

quote:
Originally posted by EgosXII
it's cause they have like 8 minutes of standing around to do before they can mix again
I get bored mixing trance, and i've only been doing it for like a month: fx are teh fun!!

...

n00bs

we all know real DJs spin happy hardcore


Posted by narcism on Nov-02-2007 06:39:

Re: Re: Decks, mixers and headphones...

quote:
Originally posted by EvilTree
xone ftw. (well, not xone 32)





Posted by EgosXII on Nov-02-2007 07:03:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Decks, mixers and headphones...

quote:
Originally posted by EvilTree
n00bs

we all know real DJs spin happy hardcore


quote:
Originally posted by narcism




[thinks] I wonder if I was playing cool sau (isaac re) when i took this photo...


Posted by Yohan on Nov-02-2007 07:09:

Re: Re: Re: Decks, mixers and headphones...

quote:
Originally posted by narcism



One of the worst designed mixer EVER


Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.